All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
To: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <zhudacai@hisilicon.com>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Zhang Jukuo'" <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
	"'Gabriele Paoloni'" <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"'Pratyush Anand'" <pratyush.anand@gmail.com>,
	"'Richard Zhu'" <Richard.Zhu@freescale.com>,
	"'Zhichang Yuan'" <yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com>,
	"'Kishon Vijay Abraham I'" <kishon@ti.com>,
	<qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Bjorn Helgaas'" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"'Liviu Dudau'" <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	"'Liguozhu'" <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
	"'Lucas Stach'" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:40:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5566FE95.6000501@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5565EEAD.9070003@st.com>

On 2015/5/28 0:19, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> On 05/27/2015 05:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wednesday 27 May 2015 17:31:46 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> Yes, that works. However there are two problems with the approach:
>>>
>>> - we have to change all PCI host drivers on ARM to do this in order to remove
>>>    the ARM-specific pcibios_msi_controller() function
>>> - it's possible that there are dw_pcie implementations that do not include
>>>    an MSI controller, so that pointer would be NULL, which leads to the
>>>    core code to still call the ARM-specific pcibios_msi_controller() function
>>>    unless we remove it.
>> I wonder if this simple patch would be sufficient to kill off
>> pcibios_msi_controller().
>>
>> Can one of you try it?
>>
>>     Arnd
> 
> Hi Arnd,
> I tested it quickly on my platform, with and without CONFIG_PCI_MSI.
> In both case it seems to run fine with dw pcie.
>

Hi Fabrice,

Thanks for testing. But if you applied this patch, the code will not go into
pcibios_init_hw(), so it did not touch what Arnd modified.

Best Regards,
Zhou

>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> index fcbbbb1b9e95..7afb6d253162 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> @@ -18,15 +18,6 @@
>>     static int debug_pci;
>>   -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> -struct msi_controller *pcibios_msi_controller(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> -{
>> -    struct pci_sys_data *sysdata = dev->bus->sysdata;
>> -
>> -    return sysdata->msi_ctrl;
>> -}
>> -#endif
>> -
>>   /*
>>    * We can't use pci_get_device() here since we are
>>    * called from interrupt context.
>> @@ -462,9 +453,6 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
>>           if (!sys)
>>               panic("PCI: unable to allocate sys data!");
>>   -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> -        sys->msi_ctrl = hw->msi_ctrl;
>> -#endif
>>           sys->busnr   = busnr;
>>           sys->swizzle = hw->swizzle;
>>           sys->map_irq = hw->map_irq;
>> @@ -493,6 +481,9 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
>>                   panic("PCI: unable to scan bus!");
>>                 busnr = sys->bus->busn_res.end + 1;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> +            bus->msi = hw->msi_ctrl;
> 
> (with small adaptation here: s/bus->msi/sys->bus->msi)
> 
> BR,
> Fabrice
>> +#endif
>>                 list_add(&sys->node, head);
>>           } else {
>>
> 
> 
> .
> 



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: wangzhou1@hisilicon.com (Zhou Wang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:40:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5566FE95.6000501@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5565EEAD.9070003@st.com>

On 2015/5/28 0:19, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> On 05/27/2015 05:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wednesday 27 May 2015 17:31:46 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> Yes, that works. However there are two problems with the approach:
>>>
>>> - we have to change all PCI host drivers on ARM to do this in order to remove
>>>    the ARM-specific pcibios_msi_controller() function
>>> - it's possible that there are dw_pcie implementations that do not include
>>>    an MSI controller, so that pointer would be NULL, which leads to the
>>>    core code to still call the ARM-specific pcibios_msi_controller() function
>>>    unless we remove it.
>> I wonder if this simple patch would be sufficient to kill off
>> pcibios_msi_controller().
>>
>> Can one of you try it?
>>
>>     Arnd
> 
> Hi Arnd,
> I tested it quickly on my platform, with and without CONFIG_PCI_MSI.
> In both case it seems to run fine with dw pcie.
>

Hi Fabrice,

Thanks for testing. But if you applied this patch, the code will not go into
pcibios_init_hw(), so it did not touch what Arnd modified.

Best Regards,
Zhou

>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> index fcbbbb1b9e95..7afb6d253162 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> @@ -18,15 +18,6 @@
>>     static int debug_pci;
>>   -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> -struct msi_controller *pcibios_msi_controller(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> -{
>> -    struct pci_sys_data *sysdata = dev->bus->sysdata;
>> -
>> -    return sysdata->msi_ctrl;
>> -}
>> -#endif
>> -
>>   /*
>>    * We can't use pci_get_device() here since we are
>>    * called from interrupt context.
>> @@ -462,9 +453,6 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
>>           if (!sys)
>>               panic("PCI: unable to allocate sys data!");
>>   -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> -        sys->msi_ctrl = hw->msi_ctrl;
>> -#endif
>>           sys->busnr   = busnr;
>>           sys->swizzle = hw->swizzle;
>>           sys->map_irq = hw->map_irq;
>> @@ -493,6 +481,9 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
>>                   panic("PCI: unable to scan bus!");
>>                 busnr = sys->bus->busn_res.end + 1;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> +            bus->msi = hw->msi_ctrl;
> 
> (with small adaptation here: s/bus->msi/sys->bus->msi)
> 
> BR,
> Fabrice
>> +#endif
>>                 list_add(&sys->node, head);
>>           } else {
>>
> 
> 
> .
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
To: Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, zhudacai@hisilicon.com,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 'Zhang Jukuo' <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
	'Gabriele Paoloni' <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	'Pratyush Anand' <pratyush.anand@gmail.com>,
	'Richard Zhu' <Richard.Zhu@freescale.com>,
	'Zhichang Yuan' <yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com>,
	'Kishon Vijay Abraham I' <kishon@ti.com>,
	qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	'Bjorn Helgaas' <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	'Liviu Dudau' <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	'Liguozhu' <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
	'Lucas Stach' <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support
Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:40:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5566FE95.6000501@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5565EEAD.9070003@st.com>

On 2015/5/28 0:19, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
> On 05/27/2015 05:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wednesday 27 May 2015 17:31:46 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> Yes, that works. However there are two problems with the approach:
>>>
>>> - we have to change all PCI host drivers on ARM to do this in order to remove
>>>    the ARM-specific pcibios_msi_controller() function
>>> - it's possible that there are dw_pcie implementations that do not include
>>>    an MSI controller, so that pointer would be NULL, which leads to the
>>>    core code to still call the ARM-specific pcibios_msi_controller() function
>>>    unless we remove it.
>> I wonder if this simple patch would be sufficient to kill off
>> pcibios_msi_controller().
>>
>> Can one of you try it?
>>
>>     Arnd
> 
> Hi Arnd,
> I tested it quickly on my platform, with and without CONFIG_PCI_MSI.
> In both case it seems to run fine with dw pcie.
>

Hi Fabrice,

Thanks for testing. But if you applied this patch, the code will not go into
pcibios_init_hw(), so it did not touch what Arnd modified.

Best Regards,
Zhou

>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> index fcbbbb1b9e95..7afb6d253162 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c
>> @@ -18,15 +18,6 @@
>>     static int debug_pci;
>>   -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> -struct msi_controller *pcibios_msi_controller(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> -{
>> -    struct pci_sys_data *sysdata = dev->bus->sysdata;
>> -
>> -    return sysdata->msi_ctrl;
>> -}
>> -#endif
>> -
>>   /*
>>    * We can't use pci_get_device() here since we are
>>    * called from interrupt context.
>> @@ -462,9 +453,6 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
>>           if (!sys)
>>               panic("PCI: unable to allocate sys data!");
>>   -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> -        sys->msi_ctrl = hw->msi_ctrl;
>> -#endif
>>           sys->busnr   = busnr;
>>           sys->swizzle = hw->swizzle;
>>           sys->map_irq = hw->map_irq;
>> @@ -493,6 +481,9 @@ static void pcibios_init_hw(struct device *parent, struct hw_pci *hw,
>>                   panic("PCI: unable to scan bus!");
>>                 busnr = sys->bus->busn_res.end + 1;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>> +            bus->msi = hw->msi_ctrl;
> 
> (with small adaptation here: s/bus->msi/sys->bus->msi)
> 
> BR,
> Fabrice
>> +#endif
>>                 list_add(&sys->node, head);
>>           } else {
>>
> 
> 
> .
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-28 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-25  5:10 [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support Jingoo Han
2015-05-25  5:10 ` Jingoo Han
2015-05-25  9:52 ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-25  9:52   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-25  9:52   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-25 13:48   ` Jingoo Han
2015-05-25 13:48     ` Jingoo Han
2015-05-25 13:48     ` Jingoo Han
2015-05-25 15:51     ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-25 15:51       ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-25 15:51       ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-26  2:49       ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  2:49         ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  2:49         ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  8:02         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-26  8:02           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 13:56           ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:56             ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:56             ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 15:31             ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 15:31               ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 15:31               ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 15:43               ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 15:43                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 16:19                 ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 16:19                   ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 16:19                   ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 19:51                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 19:51                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 11:48                     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:48                       ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:48                       ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 12:25                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 12:25                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 11:40                   ` Zhou Wang [this message]
2015-05-28 11:40                     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:40                     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:34                 ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:34                   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 11:34                   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-28 12:30                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 12:30                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-28 12:30                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-26  8:03         ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-26  8:03           ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-26  8:03           ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 13:24           ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:24             ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:24             ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:52             ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 13:52               ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-27 13:52               ` Fabrice Gasnier
2015-05-26  2:04     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  2:04       ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  2:04       ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-26  8:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-26  8:09   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-27 13:28   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:28     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-27 13:28     ` Zhou Wang
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-20  6:21 [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] PCI: hisi: Add PCIe host support for Hisilicon Soc Hip05 Zhou Wang
2015-05-20  6:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support Zhou Wang
2015-05-20  6:21   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-20  6:21   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-25  1:33   ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-25  1:33     ` Zhou Wang
2015-05-25  1:33     ` Zhou Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5566FE95.6000501@hisilicon.com \
    --to=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=Richard.Zhu@freescale.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=fabrice.gasnier@st.com \
    --cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=pratyush.anand@gmail.com \
    --cc=qiuzhenfa@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=yuanzhichang@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangjukuo@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhudacai@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.