From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Question on beacon-miss offloading.
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:45:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557F2B43.8060409@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <557EF0B0.7070008@candelatech.com>
On 06/15/2015 08:35 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 06/14/2015 10:36 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
>> On 12 June 2015 at 17:37, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2015 11:03 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
>>>> On 12 June 2015 at 01:38, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 06/11/2015 02:07 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>>>> In my ath10k CT firmware, I am disabling the beacon-miss offloading
>>>>>> to save space and because it will not work with lots of virtual
>>>>>> stations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But, it must be that I need some way to tell the stack that this
>>>>>> feature is not enabled, because when suddenly kill my AP, then
>>>>>> the ath10k station connected to it shows endless 'beacon loss' events
>>>>>> in 'iw events' output, but it never actually loses connection.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stock firmware works fine, so probably I just need to disable
>>>>>> some feature flag when registering the ath10k hardware
>>>>>> when using CT firmware.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With stock firmware, I see a quick dissassociation due to inactivity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am having poor luck finding how a driver tells the stack
>>>>>> it has beacon miss offload or not, so, does anyone know how
>>>>>> this is controlled?
>>>>>
>>>>> I still am not sure why stock firmware works, but it appears
>>>>> the reason mine is failing is that the ACK status for mgt frames
>>>>> is always set to TRUE since the ath10k wmi-mgt-tx API is so
>>>>> lame. So, mac80211 does a probe, ath10k lies and says it was
>>>>> acked, and mac80211 then things all is well for another few
>>>>> seconds.
>>>>
>>>> mac80211 shouldn't do a Probe Req to an AP on beacon loss because
>>>> ath10k advertises it supports tx-status report. Hence mac80211 should
>>>> use NullFunc frames which shouldn't go through wmi-mgmt-tx but htt
>>>> tx-frm.
>>>>
>>>> But then again: NullFunc status reporting via htt tx-frm was broken on
>>>> 10.1 if memory serves right. I believe it was fixed in 10.2 or 10.2.4.
>>>>
>>>> This problem has been effectively obscured on stock 10.1 by the
>>>> offloaded beacon miss.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the hint. I was able to fix my firmware to properly
>>> return htt tx status, and now it appears to work properly.
>>>
>>> A quick throughput test works as well, so hopefully no regressions.
>>>
>>> I guess the NulFunc related comment is incorrect for 10.1 stock firmware?
>>>
>>> Maybe some others?
>>>
>>> static void ath10k_tx_htt(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> {
>>> struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data;
>>> int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> if (ar->htt.target_version_major >= 3) {
>>> /* Since HTT 3.0 there is no separate mgmt tx command */
>>> ret = ath10k_htt_tx(&ar->htt, skb);
>>> goto exit;
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (ieee80211_is_mgmt(hdr->frame_control)) {
>>> if (test_bit(ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_HAS_WMI_MGMT_TX,
>>> ar->fw_features)) {
>>> if (skb_queue_len(&ar->wmi_mgmt_tx_queue) >=
>>> ATH10K_MAX_NUM_MGMT_PENDING) {
>>> ath10k_warn(ar, "reached WMI management transmit queue limit\n");
>>> ret = -EBUSY;
>>> goto exit;
>>> }
>>>
>>> skb_queue_tail(&ar->wmi_mgmt_tx_queue, skb);
>>> ieee80211_queue_work(ar->hw, &ar->wmi_mgmt_tx_work);
>>> } else {
>>> ret = ath10k_htt_mgmt_tx(&ar->htt, skb);
>>> }
>>> } else if (!test_bit(ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_HAS_WMI_MGMT_TX,
>>> ar->fw_features) &&
>>> ieee80211_is_nullfunc(hdr->frame_control)) {
>>> /* FW does not report tx status properly for NullFunc frames
>>> * unless they are sent through mgmt tx path. mac80211 sends
>>> * those frames when it detects link/beacon loss and depends
>>> * on the tx status to be correct. */
>>> ret = ath10k_htt_mgmt_tx(&ar->htt, skb);
>>> } else {
>>> ret = ath10k_htt_tx(&ar->htt, skb);
>>> }
>>
>> The NullFunc workaround was originally done for 999.999.0.636 but
>> should be true for 10.1 as well with the sole exception the latter
>> doesn't have htt-mgmt-tx to workaround the problem.
>
> Is it correct to say that this logic is completely broken for stock 10.1 firmware
> because null-func frames are not management frames, so the packet goes out the
> ath10k_htt_mgmt_tx call, and stock 10.1 does not properly do tx status
> for htt-tx frames?
>
>
> And slightly different question: Once I put in proper htt ACK reporting into
> my firmware, I notice that stations often loose connectivity when they are
> idle. I captured a sniff, and it appears the null-func packets are sent,
> but the header is not requesting an explicit ACK, and the AP does not ACK it,
> so connection is lost.
>
> I guess that the null-func frames should be requesting explicit ACK?
This patch below (with firmware fix to make it actually pay attention
to this special TID in station mode), fixes the null-func to be non-qos
frames and get immediate ack. This in turn seems to fix the disconnect
issue I was facing, though I need to test some more to be sure.
This seem reasonable, maybe even for upstream?
[greearb@ben-dt2 ath10k]$ git diff
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
index 6ca48e3..610447e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
@@ -2213,6 +2213,9 @@ static u8 ath10k_tx_h_get_tid(struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr)
if (ieee80211_is_mgmt(hdr->frame_control))
return HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_MGMT;
+ if (ieee80211_is_nullfunc(hdr->frame_control))
+ return HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_NON_QOS_MCAST_BCAST;
+
if (!ieee80211_is_data_qos(hdr->frame_control))
return HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_NON_QOS_MCAST_BCAST;
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question on beacon-miss offloading.
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 12:45:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <557F2B43.8060409@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <557EF0B0.7070008@candelatech.com>
On 06/15/2015 08:35 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 06/14/2015 10:36 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
>> On 12 June 2015 at 17:37, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>>> On 06/11/2015 11:03 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
>>>> On 12 June 2015 at 01:38, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 06/11/2015 02:07 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
>>>>>> In my ath10k CT firmware, I am disabling the beacon-miss offloading
>>>>>> to save space and because it will not work with lots of virtual
>>>>>> stations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But, it must be that I need some way to tell the stack that this
>>>>>> feature is not enabled, because when suddenly kill my AP, then
>>>>>> the ath10k station connected to it shows endless 'beacon loss' events
>>>>>> in 'iw events' output, but it never actually loses connection.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stock firmware works fine, so probably I just need to disable
>>>>>> some feature flag when registering the ath10k hardware
>>>>>> when using CT firmware.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With stock firmware, I see a quick dissassociation due to inactivity.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am having poor luck finding how a driver tells the stack
>>>>>> it has beacon miss offload or not, so, does anyone know how
>>>>>> this is controlled?
>>>>>
>>>>> I still am not sure why stock firmware works, but it appears
>>>>> the reason mine is failing is that the ACK status for mgt frames
>>>>> is always set to TRUE since the ath10k wmi-mgt-tx API is so
>>>>> lame. So, mac80211 does a probe, ath10k lies and says it was
>>>>> acked, and mac80211 then things all is well for another few
>>>>> seconds.
>>>>
>>>> mac80211 shouldn't do a Probe Req to an AP on beacon loss because
>>>> ath10k advertises it supports tx-status report. Hence mac80211 should
>>>> use NullFunc frames which shouldn't go through wmi-mgmt-tx but htt
>>>> tx-frm.
>>>>
>>>> But then again: NullFunc status reporting via htt tx-frm was broken on
>>>> 10.1 if memory serves right. I believe it was fixed in 10.2 or 10.2.4.
>>>>
>>>> This problem has been effectively obscured on stock 10.1 by the
>>>> offloaded beacon miss.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the hint. I was able to fix my firmware to properly
>>> return htt tx status, and now it appears to work properly.
>>>
>>> A quick throughput test works as well, so hopefully no regressions.
>>>
>>> I guess the NulFunc related comment is incorrect for 10.1 stock firmware?
>>>
>>> Maybe some others?
>>>
>>> static void ath10k_tx_htt(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> {
>>> struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)skb->data;
>>> int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> if (ar->htt.target_version_major >= 3) {
>>> /* Since HTT 3.0 there is no separate mgmt tx command */
>>> ret = ath10k_htt_tx(&ar->htt, skb);
>>> goto exit;
>>> }
>>>
>>> if (ieee80211_is_mgmt(hdr->frame_control)) {
>>> if (test_bit(ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_HAS_WMI_MGMT_TX,
>>> ar->fw_features)) {
>>> if (skb_queue_len(&ar->wmi_mgmt_tx_queue) >=
>>> ATH10K_MAX_NUM_MGMT_PENDING) {
>>> ath10k_warn(ar, "reached WMI management transmit queue limit\n");
>>> ret = -EBUSY;
>>> goto exit;
>>> }
>>>
>>> skb_queue_tail(&ar->wmi_mgmt_tx_queue, skb);
>>> ieee80211_queue_work(ar->hw, &ar->wmi_mgmt_tx_work);
>>> } else {
>>> ret = ath10k_htt_mgmt_tx(&ar->htt, skb);
>>> }
>>> } else if (!test_bit(ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_HAS_WMI_MGMT_TX,
>>> ar->fw_features) &&
>>> ieee80211_is_nullfunc(hdr->frame_control)) {
>>> /* FW does not report tx status properly for NullFunc frames
>>> * unless they are sent through mgmt tx path. mac80211 sends
>>> * those frames when it detects link/beacon loss and depends
>>> * on the tx status to be correct. */
>>> ret = ath10k_htt_mgmt_tx(&ar->htt, skb);
>>> } else {
>>> ret = ath10k_htt_tx(&ar->htt, skb);
>>> }
>>
>> The NullFunc workaround was originally done for 999.999.0.636 but
>> should be true for 10.1 as well with the sole exception the latter
>> doesn't have htt-mgmt-tx to workaround the problem.
>
> Is it correct to say that this logic is completely broken for stock 10.1 firmware
> because null-func frames are not management frames, so the packet goes out the
> ath10k_htt_mgmt_tx call, and stock 10.1 does not properly do tx status
> for htt-tx frames?
>
>
> And slightly different question: Once I put in proper htt ACK reporting into
> my firmware, I notice that stations often loose connectivity when they are
> idle. I captured a sniff, and it appears the null-func packets are sent,
> but the header is not requesting an explicit ACK, and the AP does not ACK it,
> so connection is lost.
>
> I guess that the null-func frames should be requesting explicit ACK?
This patch below (with firmware fix to make it actually pay attention
to this special TID in station mode), fixes the null-func to be non-qos
frames and get immediate ack. This in turn seems to fix the disconnect
issue I was facing, though I need to test some more to be sure.
This seem reasonable, maybe even for upstream?
[greearb@ben-dt2 ath10k]$ git diff
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
index 6ca48e3..610447e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
@@ -2213,6 +2213,9 @@ static u8 ath10k_tx_h_get_tid(struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr)
if (ieee80211_is_mgmt(hdr->frame_control))
return HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_MGMT;
+ if (ieee80211_is_nullfunc(hdr->frame_control))
+ return HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_NON_QOS_MCAST_BCAST;
+
if (!ieee80211_is_data_qos(hdr->frame_control))
return HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_NON_QOS_MCAST_BCAST;
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-15 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-11 21:07 Question on beacon-miss offloading Ben Greear
2015-06-11 21:07 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-11 23:38 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-11 23:38 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 6:03 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-12 6:03 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-12 13:29 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 13:29 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 14:10 ` Krishna Chaitanya
2015-06-12 14:10 ` Krishna Chaitanya
2015-06-12 15:22 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 15:22 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-15 5:36 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-15 5:36 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-15 15:35 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-15 15:35 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-15 19:45 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2015-06-15 19:45 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-16 5:29 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-16 5:29 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-16 21:55 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-16 21:55 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-16 23:06 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-16 23:06 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=557F2B43.8060409@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.