From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Question on beacon-miss offloading.
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:55:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55809B3E.10300@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQ=jYu2BV1rkaLwF_d5ZdDgsiws0TrWE7NGXmRsz8hMFVA@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/15/2015 10:29 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
>> This patch below (with firmware fix to make it actually pay attention
>> to this special TID in station mode), fixes the null-func to be non-qos
>> frames and get immediate ack. This in turn seems to fix the disconnect
>> issue I was facing, though I need to test some more to be sure.
>>
>> This seem reasonable, maybe even for upstream?
>>
>> [greearb@ben-dt2 ath10k]$ git diff
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>> index 6ca48e3..610447e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>> @@ -2213,6 +2213,9 @@ static u8 ath10k_tx_h_get_tid(struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr)
>> if (ieee80211_is_mgmt(hdr->frame_control))
>> return HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_MGMT;
>>
>> + if (ieee80211_is_nullfunc(hdr->frame_control))
>> + return HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_NON_QOS_MCAST_BCAST;
>> +
>
> That's weird.. QoS NullFunc frames are already converted to non-QoS
> frames, see ath10k_tx_h_nwifi():
True, but the 4.0.4 kernel sends down non-qos null-func frames as far
as I can tell, at least when doing connection probing.
In my case, my kernel was sending non-qos nullfunc frame to firmware, but then
firmware stuck it on BE queue and made it QoS.
> /* Some firmware revisions don't handle sending QoS NullFunc well.
> * These frames are mainly used for CQM purposes so it doesn't really
> * matter whether QoS NullFunc or NullFunc are sent.
> */
> hdr = (void *)skb->data;
> if (ieee80211_is_qos_nullfunc(hdr->frame_control))
> cb->htt.tid = HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_NON_QOS_MCAST_BCAST;
>
> Or is it that ath10k_tx_h_get_tid() has a bug that ends up assigning
> an invalid tid for non-QoS NullFunc frames? If so I guess your patch
> would be okay with some comments/commit-log explaining why/what was
> wrong.
I tried very recent upstream ath kernel, and stock firmware-2.bin, and it
seems to generate null-func frames fine. I'll go back at look at my
recent FW and kernel changes in more detail now that I understand the problem
better and see if I can figure out what is going on...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@tieto.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
ath10k <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Question on beacon-miss offloading.
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:55:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55809B3E.10300@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+BoTQ=jYu2BV1rkaLwF_d5ZdDgsiws0TrWE7NGXmRsz8hMFVA@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/15/2015 10:29 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
>> This patch below (with firmware fix to make it actually pay attention
>> to this special TID in station mode), fixes the null-func to be non-qos
>> frames and get immediate ack. This in turn seems to fix the disconnect
>> issue I was facing, though I need to test some more to be sure.
>>
>> This seem reasonable, maybe even for upstream?
>>
>> [greearb@ben-dt2 ath10k]$ git diff
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>> index 6ca48e3..610447e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>> @@ -2213,6 +2213,9 @@ static u8 ath10k_tx_h_get_tid(struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr)
>> if (ieee80211_is_mgmt(hdr->frame_control))
>> return HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_MGMT;
>>
>> + if (ieee80211_is_nullfunc(hdr->frame_control))
>> + return HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_NON_QOS_MCAST_BCAST;
>> +
>
> That's weird.. QoS NullFunc frames are already converted to non-QoS
> frames, see ath10k_tx_h_nwifi():
True, but the 4.0.4 kernel sends down non-qos null-func frames as far
as I can tell, at least when doing connection probing.
In my case, my kernel was sending non-qos nullfunc frame to firmware, but then
firmware stuck it on BE queue and made it QoS.
> /* Some firmware revisions don't handle sending QoS NullFunc well.
> * These frames are mainly used for CQM purposes so it doesn't really
> * matter whether QoS NullFunc or NullFunc are sent.
> */
> hdr = (void *)skb->data;
> if (ieee80211_is_qos_nullfunc(hdr->frame_control))
> cb->htt.tid = HTT_DATA_TX_EXT_TID_NON_QOS_MCAST_BCAST;
>
> Or is it that ath10k_tx_h_get_tid() has a bug that ends up assigning
> an invalid tid for non-QoS NullFunc frames? If so I guess your patch
> would be okay with some comments/commit-log explaining why/what was
> wrong.
I tried very recent upstream ath kernel, and stock firmware-2.bin, and it
seems to generate null-func frames fine. I'll go back at look at my
recent FW and kernel changes in more detail now that I understand the problem
better and see if I can figure out what is going on...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-16 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-11 21:07 Question on beacon-miss offloading Ben Greear
2015-06-11 21:07 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-11 23:38 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-11 23:38 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 6:03 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-12 6:03 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-12 13:29 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 13:29 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 14:10 ` Krishna Chaitanya
2015-06-12 14:10 ` Krishna Chaitanya
2015-06-12 15:22 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 15:22 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-12 15:37 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-15 5:36 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-15 5:36 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-15 15:35 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-15 15:35 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-15 19:45 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-15 19:45 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-16 5:29 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-16 5:29 ` Michal Kazior
2015-06-16 21:55 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2015-06-16 21:55 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-16 23:06 ` Ben Greear
2015-06-16 23:06 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55809B3E.10300@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.