All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
To: Tom Evans <tom_usenet@optusnet.com.au>,
	Stephane Grosjean <s.grosjean@peak-system.com>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>,
	Manfred Schlaegl <manfred.schlaegl@gmx.at>
Subject: Re: [BULK]Re: [PATCH] can: fix loss of frames due to wrong assumption in raw_rcv
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 07:44:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <559A15D6.2010704@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559975A2.9020300@hartkopp.net>

/me again

On 05.07.2015 20:21, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:

> With
>
> # echo 1 > /proc/irq/28/smp_affinity
>
> I assigned the IRQ 28 to CPU0 and it now looks like this:
>
> # cat /proc/interrupts
>             CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3
>    0:         23          0          0          0  IR-IO-APIC   2-edge      timer
> (..)
>   28:    9072996      53480     766233    2125901  IR-PCI-MSI 327680-edge      xhci_hcd
> (..)
>
> and all the out-of-order receptions were totally gone! \o/
>

I ran the test for 11 hours now (3 x 8000 = 24.000 frames/s).

No single out-of-order frame this time - not even with the PCAN-USB.

Cheers,
Oliver

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-06  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-20 17:21 [PATCH] can: fix loss of frames due to wrong assumption in raw_rcv Manfred Schlaegl
2015-06-20 22:42 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-06-20 22:42   ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-06-22  9:48   ` Manfred Schlaegl
2015-06-22  9:48     ` Manfred Schlaegl
2015-06-22 10:24     ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-06-22 10:24       ` Oliver Hartkopp
     [not found]       ` <5588E6FB.5040903@optusnet.com.au>
2015-06-23  8:01         ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-06-24  2:13           ` Tom Evans
2015-06-24 19:56             ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-06-25  8:32               ` [BULK]Re: " Stephane Grosjean
2015-06-25  9:36                 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-06-29 16:13                   ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-07-04 16:54                     ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-07-05  1:18                       ` Tom Evans
2015-07-05 18:21                         ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-07-06  5:44                           ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2015-07-06  6:50                             ` Tom Evans
2015-07-06 17:09                               ` Oliver Hartkopp
2015-07-06  7:58                       ` [BULK]Re: " Stephane Grosjean
2015-07-06 17:14                         ` Oliver Hartkopp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=559A15D6.2010704@hartkopp.net \
    --to=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred.schlaegl@gmx.at \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=s.grosjean@peak-system.com \
    --cc=tom_usenet@optusnet.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.