From: r.baldyga@hackerion.com (Robert Baldyga)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] usb: isp1760: udc: add missing usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit()
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 18:24:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559BFD3E.6040609@hackerion.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150707150156.GE4341@mwanda>
On 07/07/2015 05:01 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:02:51PM +0200, Robert Baldyga wrote:
>> Should use usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit instead of setting
>> maxpacket value manually.
>>
>
> This is a behavior change, right, since now we're setting
> ep->ep.maxpacket and ep->ep.maxpacket_limit where before we only set
> the first. I don't understand. This patch description is not clear.
Since maxpacket_limit was introduced all UDC drivers should set it, as
it is used by epautoconf. The ep.maxpacket_limit contains actual maximum
maxpacket value supported by hardware, ep.maxpacket is set only for
backward compatibility. Hence setting maxpacket manually instead of
using usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit() is actually a bug.
I will add better description to commit message.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c b/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
>> index 18ebf5b1..3699962 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
>> @@ -1382,11 +1382,11 @@ static void isp1760_udc_init_eps(struct isp1760_udc *udc)
>> * This fits in the 8kB FIFO without double-buffering.
>> */
>> if (ep_num == 0) {
>> - ep->ep.maxpacket = 64;
>> + usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(&ep->ep, 64);
>> ep->maxpacket = 64;
>> udc->gadget.ep0 = &ep->ep;
>> } else {
>> - ep->ep.maxpacket = 512;
>> + usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(&ep->ep, 512);
>> ep->maxpacket = 0;
>> list_add_tail(&ep->ep.ep_list, &udc->gadget.ep_list);
>> }
Thanks,
Robert Baldyga
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@hackerion.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, balbi@ti.com,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, hamohammed.sa@gmail.com,
chris@rorvick.com, tapaswenipathak@gmail.com,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com,
hgujulan@visteon.com, mina86@mina86.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vinc94@gmail.com,
roberta.dobrescu@gmail.com, andrzej.p@samsung.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] usb: isp1760: udc: add missing usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit()
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 18:24:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <559BFD3E.6040609@hackerion.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150707150156.GE4341@mwanda>
On 07/07/2015 05:01 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 04:02:51PM +0200, Robert Baldyga wrote:
>> Should use usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit instead of setting
>> maxpacket value manually.
>>
>
> This is a behavior change, right, since now we're setting
> ep->ep.maxpacket and ep->ep.maxpacket_limit where before we only set
> the first. I don't understand. This patch description is not clear.
Since maxpacket_limit was introduced all UDC drivers should set it, as
it is used by epautoconf. The ep.maxpacket_limit contains actual maximum
maxpacket value supported by hardware, ep.maxpacket is set only for
backward compatibility. Hence setting maxpacket manually instead of
using usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit() is actually a bug.
I will add better description to commit message.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c b/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
>> index 18ebf5b1..3699962 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/isp1760/isp1760-udc.c
>> @@ -1382,11 +1382,11 @@ static void isp1760_udc_init_eps(struct isp1760_udc *udc)
>> * This fits in the 8kB FIFO without double-buffering.
>> */
>> if (ep_num == 0) {
>> - ep->ep.maxpacket = 64;
>> + usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(&ep->ep, 64);
>> ep->maxpacket = 64;
>> udc->gadget.ep0 = &ep->ep;
>> } else {
>> - ep->ep.maxpacket = 512;
>> + usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit(&ep->ep, 512);
>> ep->maxpacket = 0;
>> list_add_tail(&ep->ep.ep_list, &udc->gadget.ep_list);
>> }
Thanks,
Robert Baldyga
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 14:02 [PATCH 0/5] usb: gadget: miscellaneous fixes Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 14:02 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 14:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] usb: gadget: ffs: call functionfs_unbind() if _ffs_func_bind() fails Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 14:02 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 14:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-07 14:53 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-07 16:00 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 16:00 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-07-08 7:55 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-08 7:55 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-07 14:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] usb: gadget: midi: avoid redundant f_midi_set_alt() call Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 14:02 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 14:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] usb: isp1760: udc: add missing usb_ep_set_maxpacket_limit() Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 14:02 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 15:01 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-07 15:01 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-07 16:24 ` Robert Baldyga [this message]
2015-07-07 16:24 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 14:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] staging: emxx_udc: " Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 14:02 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 14:10 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-07-07 14:10 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-07-07 15:03 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-07 15:03 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-07-07 14:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] usb: gadget: atmel_usba_udc: add missing ret value check Robert Baldyga
2015-07-07 14:02 ` Robert Baldyga
2015-07-08 8:20 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-07-08 8:20 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=559BFD3E.6040609@hackerion.com \
--to=r.baldyga@hackerion.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.