From: swarren@wwwdotorg.org (Stephen Warren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] irqchip: Add bcm2836 interrupt controller for Raspberry Pi 2.
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:09:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AEFB57.6030902@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436837718-956-5-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net>
On 07/13/2015 07:35 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> This interrupt controller is the new root interrupt controller with
> the timer, PMU events, and IPIs, and the bcm2835's interrupt
> controller is chained off of it to handle the peripherals.
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2836.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2836.c
> +static void bcm2836_arm_irqchip_mask_pmu_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + pr_err("%d: mask PMU\n", smp_processor_id());
> + writel(1 << smp_processor_id(), intc.base + LOCAL_PM_ROUTING_CLR);
> +}
> +
> +static void bcm2836_arm_irqchip_unmask_pmu_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + pr_err("%d: unmask PMU\n", smp_processor_id());
> + writel(1 << smp_processor_id(), intc.base + LOCAL_PM_ROUTING_SET);
> +}
Are those pr_err() calls left-over debug, or is there some reason it's
an error to call those functions?
Aside from this and the other minor comment, the series,
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-rpi-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Lee Jones <lee-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
Andrea Merello
<andrea.merello-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] irqchip: Add bcm2836 interrupt controller for Raspberry Pi 2.
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:09:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AEFB57.6030902@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436837718-956-5-git-send-email-eric-WhKQ6XTQaPysTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
On 07/13/2015 07:35 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> This interrupt controller is the new root interrupt controller with
> the timer, PMU events, and IPIs, and the bcm2835's interrupt
> controller is chained off of it to handle the peripherals.
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2836.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2836.c
> +static void bcm2836_arm_irqchip_mask_pmu_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + pr_err("%d: mask PMU\n", smp_processor_id());
> + writel(1 << smp_processor_id(), intc.base + LOCAL_PM_ROUTING_CLR);
> +}
> +
> +static void bcm2836_arm_irqchip_unmask_pmu_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + pr_err("%d: unmask PMU\n", smp_processor_id());
> + writel(1 << smp_processor_id(), intc.base + LOCAL_PM_ROUTING_SET);
> +}
Are those pr_err() calls left-over debug, or is there some reason it's
an error to call those functions?
Aside from this and the other minor comment, the series,
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] irqchip: Add bcm2836 interrupt controller for Raspberry Pi 2.
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 20:09:27 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55AEFB57.6030902@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436837718-956-5-git-send-email-eric@anholt.net>
On 07/13/2015 07:35 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> This interrupt controller is the new root interrupt controller with
> the timer, PMU events, and IPIs, and the bcm2835's interrupt
> controller is chained off of it to handle the peripherals.
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2836.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm2836.c
> +static void bcm2836_arm_irqchip_mask_pmu_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + pr_err("%d: mask PMU\n", smp_processor_id());
> + writel(1 << smp_processor_id(), intc.base + LOCAL_PM_ROUTING_CLR);
> +}
> +
> +static void bcm2836_arm_irqchip_unmask_pmu_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + pr_err("%d: unmask PMU\n", smp_processor_id());
> + writel(1 << smp_processor_id(), intc.base + LOCAL_PM_ROUTING_SET);
> +}
Are those pr_err() calls left-over debug, or is there some reason it's
an error to call those functions?
Aside from this and the other minor comment, the series,
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-22 2:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-14 1:35 Raspberry Pi 2 interrupt controller support (v2) Second round Eric Anholt
2015-07-14 1:35 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-14 1:35 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-14 1:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] irqchip: bcm2835: Refactor handle_IRQ() calls out of MAKE_HWIRQ Eric Anholt
2015-07-14 1:35 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-14 1:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] irqchip: bcm2835: If a parent interrupt is registered, chain from it Eric Anholt
2015-07-14 1:35 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-22 2:08 ` Stephen Warren
2015-07-22 2:08 ` Stephen Warren
2015-07-22 2:08 ` Stephen Warren
2015-07-22 18:17 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-22 18:17 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-24 4:13 ` Stephen Warren
2015-07-24 4:13 ` Stephen Warren
2015-07-24 4:13 ` Stephen Warren
2015-07-14 1:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] irqchip: Add documentation for the bcm2836 interrupt controller Eric Anholt
2015-07-14 1:35 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-14 1:35 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-14 1:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] irqchip: Add bcm2836 interrupt controller for Raspberry Pi 2 Eric Anholt
2015-07-14 1:35 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-22 2:09 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2015-07-22 2:09 ` Stephen Warren
2015-07-22 2:09 ` Stephen Warren
2015-07-22 18:02 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-22 18:02 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-22 18:02 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-26 9:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-26 9:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-26 9:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-07-27 18:42 ` [PATCH] irq-bcm2836: Move SMP boot to the irqchip code Eric Anholt
2015-07-27 18:42 ` Eric Anholt
2015-07-27 18:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-07-27 18:46 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-07-27 20:09 ` [PATCH] irqchip: bcm2836: Use a CPU notifier enable IPIs Eric Anholt
2015-07-27 20:09 ` Eric Anholt
2015-08-02 10:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-02 10:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-02 10:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-03 23:23 ` Eric Anholt
2015-08-03 23:23 ` Eric Anholt
2015-08-03 23:23 ` Eric Anholt
2015-08-04 7:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-04 7:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-08-04 7:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55AEFB57.6030902@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.