From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: at91: at91_dt_defconfig: enable ISI and ov2640 support
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:20:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BA1689.4090008@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55B73A10.4040608@atmel.com>
Le 28/07/2015 10:15, Josh Wu a ?crit :
> On 7/28/2015 3:37 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Le 16/06/2015 12:08, Josh Wu a ?crit :
>>> Add Atmel-isi and ov2640 driver in defconfig
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2: None
>>>
>>> arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig
>>> index bcef49a..d089ec9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig
>>> @@ -131,6 +131,12 @@ CONFIG_POWER_RESET=y
>>> CONFIG_WATCHDOG=y
>>> CONFIG_AT91SAM9X_WATCHDOG=y
>>> CONFIG_SSB=m
>>> +CONFIG_MEDIA_SUPPORT=y
>>> +CONFIG_MEDIA_CAMERA_SUPPORT=y
>>> +CONFIG_V4L_PLATFORM_DRIVERS=y
>>> +CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA=y
>>> +CONFIG_VIDEO_ATMEL_ISI=y
>>> +CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_OV2640=y
>> I would select this camera driver as a module. Your thoughts?
>
> yes, I agree.
> Do I need to resent the patch for this?
Nope, no need: I do it while am queuing this patch in at91-4.3-dt with my:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: at91: at91_dt_defconfig: enable ISI and ov2640 support
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:20:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55BA1689.4090008@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55B73A10.4040608@atmel.com>
Le 28/07/2015 10:15, Josh Wu a écrit :
> On 7/28/2015 3:37 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Le 16/06/2015 12:08, Josh Wu a écrit :
>>> Add Atmel-isi and ov2640 driver in defconfig
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Josh Wu <josh.wu@atmel.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes in v2: None
>>>
>>> arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig | 6 ++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig
>>> index bcef49a..d089ec9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/at91_dt_defconfig
>>> @@ -131,6 +131,12 @@ CONFIG_POWER_RESET=y
>>> CONFIG_WATCHDOG=y
>>> CONFIG_AT91SAM9X_WATCHDOG=y
>>> CONFIG_SSB=m
>>> +CONFIG_MEDIA_SUPPORT=y
>>> +CONFIG_MEDIA_CAMERA_SUPPORT=y
>>> +CONFIG_V4L_PLATFORM_DRIVERS=y
>>> +CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA=y
>>> +CONFIG_VIDEO_ATMEL_ISI=y
>>> +CONFIG_SOC_CAMERA_OV2640=y
>> I would select this camera driver as a module. Your thoughts?
>
> yes, I agree.
> Do I need to resent the patch for this?
Nope, no need: I do it while am queuing this patch in at91-4.3-dt with my:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-30 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-16 10:08 [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: at91: dts: add isi & ov2640 dt nodes for at91sam9m10g45ek board Josh Wu
2015-06-16 10:08 ` Josh Wu
2015-06-16 10:08 ` Josh Wu
2015-06-16 10:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ARM: at91: at91_dt_defconfig: enable ISI and ov2640 support Josh Wu
2015-06-16 10:08 ` Josh Wu
2015-07-28 7:37 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-07-28 7:37 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-07-28 8:15 ` Josh Wu
2015-07-28 8:15 ` Josh Wu
2015-07-30 12:20 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-07-30 12:20 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-06-18 15:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: at91: dts: add isi & ov2640 dt nodes for at91sam9m10g45ek board Alexandre Belloni
2015-06-18 15:45 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-06-18 15:45 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-07-30 12:03 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-07-30 12:03 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-07-30 12:03 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55BA1689.4090008@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.