From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add CA53 L2 cache-controller node
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:44:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C2C534.30704@de.bosch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455568715-20880-8-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
On 15.02.2016 21:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Add a device node for the Cortex-A53 L2 cache-controller.
>
> The L2 cache for the Cortex-A53 CPU cores is 512 KiB large (organized as
> 32 KiB x 16 ways).
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
> v3:
> - Remaining part of "[PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: renesas: r8a7795: Add L2
> cache-controller nodes".
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> index c07f4e83b988ba42..c572527afec3403a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> @@ -72,6 +72,12 @@
> cache-level = <2>;
> };
>
> + L2_CA53: cache-controller@1 {
> + compatible = "cache";
> + cache-unified;
> + cache-level = <2>;
> + };
> +
As we don't have any CA53 in the device tree yet, and it was rejected to
add it, I'd think that we don't want these unused entries at the moment.
I'd propose to add the CA53 entries, first. And then add their L2 cache
entries.
Based on the outcome of the discussion for the CA57 we have to see if we
want to add the unused cache-unified and cache-level, then, too.
Best regards
Dirk
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dirk.behme@de.bosch.com (Dirk Behme)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add CA53 L2 cache-controller node
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:44:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C2C534.30704@de.bosch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455568715-20880-8-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be>
On 15.02.2016 21:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Add a device node for the Cortex-A53 L2 cache-controller.
>
> The L2 cache for the Cortex-A53 CPU cores is 512 KiB large (organized as
> 32 KiB x 16 ways).
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> ---
> v3:
> - Remaining part of "[PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: renesas: r8a7795: Add L2
> cache-controller nodes".
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> index c07f4e83b988ba42..c572527afec3403a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> @@ -72,6 +72,12 @@
> cache-level = <2>;
> };
>
> + L2_CA53: cache-controller at 1 {
> + compatible = "cache";
> + cache-unified;
> + cache-level = <2>;
> + };
> +
As we don't have any CA53 in the device tree yet, and it was rejected to
add it, I'd think that we don't want these unused entries at the moment.
I'd propose to add the CA53 entries, first. And then add their L2 cache
entries.
Based on the outcome of the discussion for the CA57 we have to see if we
want to add the unused cache-unified and cache-level, then, too.
Best regards
Dirk
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme-V5te9oGctAVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
Simon Horman <horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
linux-renesas-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add CA53 L2 cache-controller node
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 07:44:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C2C534.30704@de.bosch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455568715-20880-8-git-send-email-geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
On 15.02.2016 21:38, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Add a device node for the Cortex-A53 L2 cache-controller.
>
> The L2 cache for the Cortex-A53 CPU cores is 512 KiB large (organized as
> 32 KiB x 16 ways).
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> v3:
> - Remaining part of "[PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: renesas: r8a7795: Add L2
> cache-controller nodes".
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> index c07f4e83b988ba42..c572527afec3403a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi
> @@ -72,6 +72,12 @@
> cache-level = <2>;
> };
>
> + L2_CA53: cache-controller@1 {
> + compatible = "cache";
> + cache-unified;
> + cache-level = <2>;
> + };
> +
As we don't have any CA53 in the device tree yet, and it was rejected to
add it, I'd think that we don't want these unused entries at the moment.
I'd propose to add the CA53 entries, first. And then add their L2 cache
entries.
Based on the outcome of the discussion for the CA57 we have to see if we
want to add the unused cache-unified and cache-level, then, too.
Best regards
Dirk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-16 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-15 20:38 [PATCH v3 0/7] ARM/arm64: dts: renesas: Add/complete L2 cache-controller nodes Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] ARM: dts: r8a73a4: Add " Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] ARM: dts: r8a7790: " Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Add L2 cache-controller node Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] ARM: dts: r8a7793: " Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] ARM: dts: r8a7794: " Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add missing properties to CA57 L2 cache node Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-16 6:40 ` Dirk Behme
2016-02-16 6:40 ` Dirk Behme
2016-02-16 6:40 ` Dirk Behme
2016-02-16 9:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-16 9:43 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-16 9:55 ` Dirk Behme
2016-02-16 9:55 ` Dirk Behme
2016-02-16 9:55 ` Dirk Behme
2016-02-15 20:38 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add CA53 L2 cache-controller node Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-15 20:38 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-16 6:44 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2016-02-16 6:44 ` Dirk Behme
2016-02-16 6:44 ` Dirk Behme
2016-02-16 7:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-16 7:12 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-02-16 7:33 ` Dirk Behme
2016-02-16 7:33 ` Dirk Behme
2016-02-16 7:33 ` Dirk Behme
2016-02-16 9:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-16 9:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-16 9:46 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-17 5:53 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] ARM/arm64: dts: renesas: Add/complete L2 cache-controller nodes Simon Horman
2016-02-17 5:53 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C2C534.30704@de.bosch.com \
--to=dirk.behme@de.bosch.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.