All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: drjones@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] powerpc: Add tests for RTAS
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 16:54:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D86C5E.8050900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457008099-29944-1-git-send-email-lvivier@redhat.com>

On 03.03.2016 13:28, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> By starting with get-time-of-day, set-time-of-day.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/powerpc/rtas.c b/powerpc/rtas.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9d673f0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/powerpc/rtas.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
> +/*
> + * Test the RTAS interface
> + */
> +
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <util.h>
> +#include <asm/rtas.h>
> +
> +#define DAYS(y,m,d) (365UL * (y) + ((y) / 4) - ((y) / 100) + ((y) / 400) + \
> +		     367UL * (m) / 12  + \
> +		     (d))

A friendly comment before that macro would be nice - since it is not so
obvious what it is doing when you see it for the first time.

> +static unsigned long mktime(int year, int month, int day,
> +			    int hour, int minute, int second)
> +{
> +	unsigned long epoch;
> +
> +	/* Put February at end of the year to avoid leap day this year */
> +
> +	month -= 2;
> +	if (month <= 0) {
> +		month += 12;
> +		year -= 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* compute epoch: substract DAYS(since_March(1-1-1970)) */
> +
> +	epoch = DAYS(year, month, day) - DAYS(1969, 11, 1);
> +
> +	epoch = epoch * 24 + hour;
> +	epoch = epoch * 60 + minute;
> +	epoch = epoch * 60 + second;
> +
> +	return epoch;
> +}
> +
> +#define DELAY 1
> +#define MAX_LOOP 10000000
> +
> +static void check_get_time_of_day(unsigned long start)
> +{
> +	int token;
> +	int ret;
> +	int now[8];
> +	unsigned long t1, t2, count;
> +
> +	token = rtas_token("get-time-of-day");
> +	report("token available", token != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE);
> +	if (token = RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
> +		return;
> +
> +	ret = rtas_call(token, 0, 8, now);
> +	report("execution", ret = 0);
> +
> +	report("second",  now[5] >= 0 && now[5] <= 59);
> +	report("minute", now[4] >= 0 && now[4] <= 59);
> +	report("hour", now[3] >= 0 && now[3] <= 23);
> +	report("day", now[2] >= 1 && now[2] <= 31);
> +	report("month", now[1] >= 1 && now[1] <= 12);
> +	report("year", now[0] >= 1970);
> +	report("accuracy (< 3s)", mktime(now[0], now[1], now[2],
> +					 now[3], now[4], now[5]) - start < 3);
> +
> +	ret = rtas_call(token, 0, 8, now);

Maybe make sure that ret = 0 here again? ... or you could simply omit
this call and recycle the results from the first rtas_call ?

> +	t1 = mktime(now[0], now[1], now[2], now[3], now[4], now[5]);
> +	count = 0;
> +	do {
> +		ret = rtas_call(token, 0, 8, now);
> +		t2 = mktime(now[0], now[1], now[2], now[3], now[4], now[5]);
> +		count++;
> +	} while (t1 + DELAY > t2 && count < MAX_LOOP);
> +	report("running", t1 + DELAY <= t2);

I think at least here you should add another "ret = 0" check again,
just to be sure.

> +}
> +
> +static void check_set_time_of_day(void)
> +{
> +	int token;
> +	int ret;
> +	int date[8];
> +	unsigned long t1, t2, count;
> +
> +	token = rtas_token("set-time-of-day");
> +	report("token available", token != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE);
> +	if (token = RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* 23:59:59 28/2/2000 */
> +
> +	ret = rtas_call(token, 7, 1, NULL, 2000, 2, 28, 23, 59, 59);
> +	report("execution", ret = 0);
> +
> +	/* check it has worked */
> +	ret = rtas_call(rtas_token("get-time-of-day"), 0, 8, date);
> +	report("re-read", ret = 0);
> +	t1 = mktime(2000, 2, 28, 23, 59, 59);
> +	t2 = mktime(date[0], date[1], date[2],
> +		    date[3], date[4], date[5]);
> +	report("result", t2 - t1 < 2);
> +
> +	/* check it is running */
> +	count = 0;
> +	do {
> +		ret = rtas_call(rtas_token("get-time-of-day"), 0, 8, date);
> +		t2 = mktime(date[0], date[1], date[2],
> +			    date[3], date[4], date[5]);
> +		count++;
> +	} while (t1 + DELAY > t2 && count < MAX_LOOP);
> +	report("running", t1 + DELAY <= t2);

Please also add a check for "ret = 0" here ... just to be really,
really sure ;-)

> +}

... but apart from these minor issues, the patch looks pretty good to me
already!

 Thomas


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: drjones@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] powerpc: Add tests for RTAS
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 17:54:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D86C5E.8050900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457008099-29944-1-git-send-email-lvivier@redhat.com>

On 03.03.2016 13:28, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> By starting with get-time-of-day, set-time-of-day.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/powerpc/rtas.c b/powerpc/rtas.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9d673f0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/powerpc/rtas.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
> +/*
> + * Test the RTAS interface
> + */
> +
> +#include <libcflat.h>
> +#include <util.h>
> +#include <asm/rtas.h>
> +
> +#define DAYS(y,m,d) (365UL * (y) + ((y) / 4) - ((y) / 100) + ((y) / 400) + \
> +		     367UL * (m) / 12  + \
> +		     (d))

A friendly comment before that macro would be nice - since it is not so
obvious what it is doing when you see it for the first time.

> +static unsigned long mktime(int year, int month, int day,
> +			    int hour, int minute, int second)
> +{
> +	unsigned long epoch;
> +
> +	/* Put February at end of the year to avoid leap day this year */
> +
> +	month -= 2;
> +	if (month <= 0) {
> +		month += 12;
> +		year -= 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* compute epoch: substract DAYS(since_March(1-1-1970)) */
> +
> +	epoch = DAYS(year, month, day) - DAYS(1969, 11, 1);
> +
> +	epoch = epoch * 24 + hour;
> +	epoch = epoch * 60 + minute;
> +	epoch = epoch * 60 + second;
> +
> +	return epoch;
> +}
> +
> +#define DELAY 1
> +#define MAX_LOOP 10000000
> +
> +static void check_get_time_of_day(unsigned long start)
> +{
> +	int token;
> +	int ret;
> +	int now[8];
> +	unsigned long t1, t2, count;
> +
> +	token = rtas_token("get-time-of-day");
> +	report("token available", token != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE);
> +	if (token == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
> +		return;
> +
> +	ret = rtas_call(token, 0, 8, now);
> +	report("execution", ret == 0);
> +
> +	report("second",  now[5] >= 0 && now[5] <= 59);
> +	report("minute", now[4] >= 0 && now[4] <= 59);
> +	report("hour", now[3] >= 0 && now[3] <= 23);
> +	report("day", now[2] >= 1 && now[2] <= 31);
> +	report("month", now[1] >= 1 && now[1] <= 12);
> +	report("year", now[0] >= 1970);
> +	report("accuracy (< 3s)", mktime(now[0], now[1], now[2],
> +					 now[3], now[4], now[5]) - start < 3);
> +
> +	ret = rtas_call(token, 0, 8, now);

Maybe make sure that ret == 0 here again? ... or you could simply omit
this call and recycle the results from the first rtas_call ?

> +	t1 = mktime(now[0], now[1], now[2], now[3], now[4], now[5]);
> +	count = 0;
> +	do {
> +		ret = rtas_call(token, 0, 8, now);
> +		t2 = mktime(now[0], now[1], now[2], now[3], now[4], now[5]);
> +		count++;
> +	} while (t1 + DELAY > t2 && count < MAX_LOOP);
> +	report("running", t1 + DELAY <= t2);

I think at least here you should add another "ret == 0" check again,
just to be sure.

> +}
> +
> +static void check_set_time_of_day(void)
> +{
> +	int token;
> +	int ret;
> +	int date[8];
> +	unsigned long t1, t2, count;
> +
> +	token = rtas_token("set-time-of-day");
> +	report("token available", token != RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE);
> +	if (token == RTAS_UNKNOWN_SERVICE)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* 23:59:59 28/2/2000 */
> +
> +	ret = rtas_call(token, 7, 1, NULL, 2000, 2, 28, 23, 59, 59);
> +	report("execution", ret == 0);
> +
> +	/* check it has worked */
> +	ret = rtas_call(rtas_token("get-time-of-day"), 0, 8, date);
> +	report("re-read", ret == 0);
> +	t1 = mktime(2000, 2, 28, 23, 59, 59);
> +	t2 = mktime(date[0], date[1], date[2],
> +		    date[3], date[4], date[5]);
> +	report("result", t2 - t1 < 2);
> +
> +	/* check it is running */
> +	count = 0;
> +	do {
> +		ret = rtas_call(rtas_token("get-time-of-day"), 0, 8, date);
> +		t2 = mktime(date[0], date[1], date[2],
> +			    date[3], date[4], date[5]);
> +		count++;
> +	} while (t1 + DELAY > t2 && count < MAX_LOOP);
> +	report("running", t1 + DELAY <= t2);

Please also add a check for "ret == 0" here ... just to be really,
really sure ;-)

> +}

... but apart from these minor issues, the patch looks pretty good to me
already!

 Thomas


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-03 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-25 21:19 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] powerpc: Add tests for sPAPR h-calls Thomas Huth
2016-02-25 21:19 ` Thomas Huth
2016-02-29  0:38 ` David Gibson
2016-02-29  0:38   ` David Gibson
2016-03-03 12:28 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] powerpc: Add tests for RTAS Laurent Vivier
2016-03-03 12:28   ` Laurent Vivier
2016-03-03 12:45   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-03 12:45     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-03 13:02     ` Laurent Vivier
2016-03-03 13:02       ` Laurent Vivier
2016-03-03 16:03   ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-03 16:03     ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-03 16:29     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-03 16:29       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-03 17:09       ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-03 17:09         ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-03 17:12         ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-03 17:12           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-03 17:17           ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-03 17:17             ` Radim Krčmář
2016-03-03 16:54   ` Thomas Huth [this message]
2016-03-03 16:54     ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56D86C5E.8050900@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.