From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
To: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org,
jcm@redhat.com
Cc: shankerd@codeaurora.org, vikrams@codeaurora.org,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, vinod.koul@intel.com,
agross@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:11:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E14858.9050401@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457451209-21462-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
Hi Sinan,
On 03/08/2016 04:33 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The code is using the compatible DT string to associate a reset driver with
> the actual device itself. The compatible string does not exist on ACPI
> based systems. HID is the unique identifier for a device driver instead.
> The change allows a driver to register with DT compatible string or ACPI
> HID and then match the object with one of these conditions.
>
> Rules for loading the reset driver are as follow:
> - ACPI HID needs match for ACPI systems
> - DT compat needs to match for OF systems
>
> Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> (device tree only)
> Tested-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> (ACPI only)
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> .../vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c | 4 +-
> .../platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c | 4 +-
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h | 43 ++++----
> 4 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c
> index d4030d0..170dcf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,9 @@ int vfio_platform_amdxgbe_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -module_vfio_reset_handler("amd,xgbe-seattle-v1a", vfio_platform_amdxgbe_reset);
> +module_vfio_reset_handler("amd,xgbe-seattle-v1a", NULL,
> + vfio_platform_amdxgbe_reset);
> +VFIO_PLATFORM_MODULE_ALIAS("amd,xgbe-seattle-v1a");
Looks the other overridden MODULE_ALIAS have a naming like
MODULE_ALIAS_something? what about MODULE_ALIAS_VFIO_PLATFORM_RESET?
not very compact but maybe closer to what it stands for.
>
> MODULE_VERSION("0.1");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c
> index e3d3d94..635c6e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,9 @@ int vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -module_vfio_reset_handler("calxeda,hb-xgmac", vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset);
> +module_vfio_reset_handler("calxeda,hb-xgmac", NULL,
> + vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset);
> +VFIO_PLATFORM_MODULE_ALIAS("calxeda,hb-xgmac");
>
> MODULE_VERSION(DRIVER_VERSION);
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> index 418cdd9..c758e72 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> @@ -31,14 +32,22 @@ static LIST_HEAD(reset_list);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(driver_lock);
>
> static vfio_platform_reset_fn_t vfio_platform_lookup_reset(const char *compat,
> - struct module **module)
> + const char *acpihid, struct module **module)
> {
> struct vfio_platform_reset_node *iter;
> vfio_platform_reset_fn_t reset_fn = NULL;
>
> mutex_lock(&driver_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(iter, &reset_list, link) {
> - if (!strcmp(iter->compat, compat) &&
> + if (acpihid && iter->acpihid &&
> + !strcmp(iter->acpihid, acpihid) &&
> + try_module_get(iter->owner)) {
> + *module = iter->owner;
> + reset_fn = iter->reset;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (compat && iter->compat &&
> + !strcmp(iter->compat, compat) &&
> try_module_get(iter->owner)) {
> *module = iter->owner;
> reset_fn = iter->reset;
> @@ -49,15 +58,30 @@ static vfio_platform_reset_fn_t vfio_platform_lookup_reset(const char *compat,
> return reset_fn;
> }
>
> -static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> +static int vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
What is the point returning a value here? See my comment at the end.
> {
> - vdev->reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat,
> - &vdev->reset_module);
> - if (!vdev->reset) {
> - request_module("vfio-reset:%s", vdev->compat);
> - vdev->reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat,
> - &vdev->reset_module);
> - }
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + vdev->reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat, vdev->acpihid,
> + &vdev->reset_module);
> + if (vdev->reset)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (vdev->acpihid)
> + rc = request_module("vfio-reset:%s", vdev->acpihid);
> +
> + if (rc && vdev->compat)
> + rc = request_module("vfio-reset:%s", vdev->compat);
> +
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + vdev->reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat, vdev->acpihid,
> + &vdev->reset_module);
> + if (vdev->reset)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> static void vfio_platform_put_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> @@ -541,6 +565,46 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_platform_ops = {
> .mmap = vfio_platform_mmap,
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +int vfio_platform_probe_acpi(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device* adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
checkpatch reports: ERROR: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar"
> +
> + if (!adev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + vdev->acpihid = acpi_device_hid(adev);
> + if (!vdev->acpihid) {
> + pr_err("VFIO: cannot find ACPI HID for %s\n",
> + vdev->name);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +int vfio_platform_probe_acpi(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +int vfio_platform_probe_of(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = device_property_read_string(dev, "compatible",
> + &vdev->compat);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("VFIO: cannot retrieve compat for %s\n",
> + vdev->name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int vfio_platform_probe_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> struct device *dev)
> {
> @@ -550,14 +614,14 @@ int vfio_platform_probe_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> if (!vdev)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - ret = device_property_read_string(dev, "compatible", &vdev->compat);
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_err("VFIO: cannot retrieve compat for %s\n", vdev->name);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + ret = vfio_platform_probe_acpi(vdev, dev);
> + if (ret)
> + ret = vfio_platform_probe_of(vdev, dev);
>
> - vdev->device = dev;
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> + vdev->device = dev;
> group = iommu_group_get(dev);
> if (!group) {
> pr_err("VFIO: No IOMMU group for device %s\n", vdev->name);
> @@ -570,7 +634,11 @@ int vfio_platform_probe_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - vfio_platform_get_reset(vdev);
> + ret = vfio_platform_get_reset(vdev);
> + if (ret) {
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> + return ret;
> + }
This change is not related to your commit message. Also here you change
the use model of VFIO platform and forbid any usage if no reset module
is available, right? I don't think this is something we discussed and I
think it removes some flexibility. Currently a warning is emitted in
case we don't have a reset function.
Best Regards
Eric
>
> mutex_init(&vdev->igate);
>
> @@ -602,13 +670,21 @@ void __vfio_platform_register_reset(struct vfio_platform_reset_node *node)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__vfio_platform_register_reset);
>
> void vfio_platform_unregister_reset(const char *compat,
> + const char *acpihid,
> vfio_platform_reset_fn_t fn)
> {
> struct vfio_platform_reset_node *iter, *temp;
>
> mutex_lock(&driver_lock);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, temp, &reset_list, link) {
> - if (!strcmp(iter->compat, compat) && (iter->reset == fn)) {
> + if (acpihid && iter->acpihid &&
> + !strcmp(iter->acpihid, acpihid) && (iter->reset == fn)) {
> + list_del(&iter->link);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (compat && iter->compat &&
> + !strcmp(iter->compat, compat) && (iter->reset == fn)) {
> list_del(&iter->link);
> break;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> index 42816dd..20787f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct vfio_platform_device {
> struct mutex igate;
> struct module *parent_module;
> const char *compat;
> + const char *acpihid;
> struct module *reset_module;
> struct device *device;
>
> @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ typedef int (*vfio_platform_reset_fn_t)(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev);
> struct vfio_platform_reset_node {
> struct list_head link;
> char *compat;
> + char *acpihid;
> struct module *owner;
> vfio_platform_reset_fn_t reset;
> };
> @@ -98,27 +100,32 @@ extern int vfio_platform_set_irqs_ioctl(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>
> extern void __vfio_platform_register_reset(struct vfio_platform_reset_node *n);
> extern void vfio_platform_unregister_reset(const char *compat,
> + const char *acpihid,
> vfio_platform_reset_fn_t fn);
> -#define vfio_platform_register_reset(__compat, __reset) \
> -static struct vfio_platform_reset_node __reset ## _node = { \
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE, \
> - .compat = __compat, \
> - .reset = __reset, \
> -}; \
> +
> +#define vfio_platform_register_reset(__compat, __acpihid, __reset) \
> +static struct vfio_platform_reset_node __reset ## _node = { \
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE, \
> + .compat = __compat, \
> + .acpihid = __acpihid, \
> + .reset = __reset, \
> +}; \
> __vfio_platform_register_reset(&__reset ## _node)
>
> -#define module_vfio_reset_handler(compat, reset) \
> -MODULE_ALIAS("vfio-reset:" compat); \
> -static int __init reset ## _module_init(void) \
> -{ \
> - vfio_platform_register_reset(compat, reset); \
> - return 0; \
> -}; \
> -static void __exit reset ## _module_exit(void) \
> -{ \
> - vfio_platform_unregister_reset(compat, reset); \
> -}; \
> -module_init(reset ## _module_init); \
> +#define VFIO_PLATFORM_MODULE_ALIAS(name) \
> + MODULE_ALIAS("vfio-reset:" name)
> +
> +#define module_vfio_reset_handler(compat, acpihid, reset) \
> +static int __init reset ## _module_init(void) \
> +{ \
> + vfio_platform_register_reset(compat, acpihid, reset); \
> + return 0; \
> +}; \
> +static void __exit reset ## _module_exit(void) \
> +{ \
> + vfio_platform_unregister_reset(compat, acpihid, reset); \
> +}; \
> +module_init(reset ## _module_init); \
> module_exit(reset ## _module_exit)
>
> #endif /* VFIO_PLATFORM_PRIVATE_H */
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: eric.auger@linaro.org (Eric Auger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 11:11:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E14858.9050401@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457451209-21462-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
Hi Sinan,
On 03/08/2016 04:33 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> The code is using the compatible DT string to associate a reset driver with
> the actual device itself. The compatible string does not exist on ACPI
> based systems. HID is the unique identifier for a device driver instead.
> The change allows a driver to register with DT compatible string or ACPI
> HID and then match the object with one of these conditions.
>
> Rules for loading the reset driver are as follow:
> - ACPI HID needs match for ACPI systems
> - DT compat needs to match for OF systems
>
> Tested-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> (device tree only)
> Tested-by: Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org> (ACPI only)
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> .../vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c | 4 +-
> .../platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c | 4 +-
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c | 112 +++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h | 43 ++++----
> 4 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c
> index d4030d0..170dcf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_amdxgbe.c
> @@ -119,7 +119,9 @@ int vfio_platform_amdxgbe_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -module_vfio_reset_handler("amd,xgbe-seattle-v1a", vfio_platform_amdxgbe_reset);
> +module_vfio_reset_handler("amd,xgbe-seattle-v1a", NULL,
> + vfio_platform_amdxgbe_reset);
> +VFIO_PLATFORM_MODULE_ALIAS("amd,xgbe-seattle-v1a");
Looks the other overridden MODULE_ALIAS have a naming like
MODULE_ALIAS_something? what about MODULE_ALIAS_VFIO_PLATFORM_RESET?
not very compact but maybe closer to what it stands for.
>
> MODULE_VERSION("0.1");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c
> index e3d3d94..635c6e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/reset/vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,9 @@ int vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -module_vfio_reset_handler("calxeda,hb-xgmac", vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset);
> +module_vfio_reset_handler("calxeda,hb-xgmac", NULL,
> + vfio_platform_calxedaxgmac_reset);
> +VFIO_PLATFORM_MODULE_ALIAS("calxeda,hb-xgmac");
>
> MODULE_VERSION(DRIVER_VERSION);
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> index 418cdd9..c758e72 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> @@ -31,14 +32,22 @@ static LIST_HEAD(reset_list);
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(driver_lock);
>
> static vfio_platform_reset_fn_t vfio_platform_lookup_reset(const char *compat,
> - struct module **module)
> + const char *acpihid, struct module **module)
> {
> struct vfio_platform_reset_node *iter;
> vfio_platform_reset_fn_t reset_fn = NULL;
>
> mutex_lock(&driver_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(iter, &reset_list, link) {
> - if (!strcmp(iter->compat, compat) &&
> + if (acpihid && iter->acpihid &&
> + !strcmp(iter->acpihid, acpihid) &&
> + try_module_get(iter->owner)) {
> + *module = iter->owner;
> + reset_fn = iter->reset;
> + break;
> + }
> + if (compat && iter->compat &&
> + !strcmp(iter->compat, compat) &&
> try_module_get(iter->owner)) {
> *module = iter->owner;
> reset_fn = iter->reset;
> @@ -49,15 +58,30 @@ static vfio_platform_reset_fn_t vfio_platform_lookup_reset(const char *compat,
> return reset_fn;
> }
>
> -static void vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> +static int vfio_platform_get_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
What is the point returning a value here? See my comment at the end.
> {
> - vdev->reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat,
> - &vdev->reset_module);
> - if (!vdev->reset) {
> - request_module("vfio-reset:%s", vdev->compat);
> - vdev->reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat,
> - &vdev->reset_module);
> - }
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + vdev->reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat, vdev->acpihid,
> + &vdev->reset_module);
> + if (vdev->reset)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (vdev->acpihid)
> + rc = request_module("vfio-reset:%s", vdev->acpihid);
> +
> + if (rc && vdev->compat)
> + rc = request_module("vfio-reset:%s", vdev->compat);
> +
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + vdev->reset = vfio_platform_lookup_reset(vdev->compat, vdev->acpihid,
> + &vdev->reset_module);
> + if (vdev->reset)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> static void vfio_platform_put_reset(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev)
> @@ -541,6 +565,46 @@ static const struct vfio_device_ops vfio_platform_ops = {
> .mmap = vfio_platform_mmap,
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +int vfio_platform_probe_acpi(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device* adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
checkpatch reports: ERROR: "foo* bar" should be "foo *bar"
> +
> + if (!adev)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + vdev->acpihid = acpi_device_hid(adev);
> + if (!vdev->acpihid) {
> + pr_err("VFIO: cannot find ACPI HID for %s\n",
> + vdev->name);
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +int vfio_platform_probe_acpi(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +int vfio_platform_probe_of(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> + struct device *dev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = device_property_read_string(dev, "compatible",
> + &vdev->compat);
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_err("VFIO: cannot retrieve compat for %s\n",
> + vdev->name);
> + return ret;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int vfio_platform_probe_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> struct device *dev)
> {
> @@ -550,14 +614,14 @@ int vfio_platform_probe_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> if (!vdev)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - ret = device_property_read_string(dev, "compatible", &vdev->compat);
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_err("VFIO: cannot retrieve compat for %s\n", vdev->name);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + ret = vfio_platform_probe_acpi(vdev, dev);
> + if (ret)
> + ret = vfio_platform_probe_of(vdev, dev);
>
> - vdev->device = dev;
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> + vdev->device = dev;
> group = iommu_group_get(dev);
> if (!group) {
> pr_err("VFIO: No IOMMU group for device %s\n", vdev->name);
> @@ -570,7 +634,11 @@ int vfio_platform_probe_common(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - vfio_platform_get_reset(vdev);
> + ret = vfio_platform_get_reset(vdev);
> + if (ret) {
> + iommu_group_put(group);
> + return ret;
> + }
This change is not related to your commit message. Also here you change
the use model of VFIO platform and forbid any usage if no reset module
is available, right? I don't think this is something we discussed and I
think it removes some flexibility. Currently a warning is emitted in
case we don't have a reset function.
Best Regards
Eric
>
> mutex_init(&vdev->igate);
>
> @@ -602,13 +670,21 @@ void __vfio_platform_register_reset(struct vfio_platform_reset_node *node)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__vfio_platform_register_reset);
>
> void vfio_platform_unregister_reset(const char *compat,
> + const char *acpihid,
> vfio_platform_reset_fn_t fn)
> {
> struct vfio_platform_reset_node *iter, *temp;
>
> mutex_lock(&driver_lock);
> list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, temp, &reset_list, link) {
> - if (!strcmp(iter->compat, compat) && (iter->reset == fn)) {
> + if (acpihid && iter->acpihid &&
> + !strcmp(iter->acpihid, acpihid) && (iter->reset == fn)) {
> + list_del(&iter->link);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (compat && iter->compat &&
> + !strcmp(iter->compat, compat) && (iter->reset == fn)) {
> list_del(&iter->link);
> break;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> index 42816dd..20787f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ struct vfio_platform_device {
> struct mutex igate;
> struct module *parent_module;
> const char *compat;
> + const char *acpihid;
> struct module *reset_module;
> struct device *device;
>
> @@ -79,6 +80,7 @@ typedef int (*vfio_platform_reset_fn_t)(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev);
> struct vfio_platform_reset_node {
> struct list_head link;
> char *compat;
> + char *acpihid;
> struct module *owner;
> vfio_platform_reset_fn_t reset;
> };
> @@ -98,27 +100,32 @@ extern int vfio_platform_set_irqs_ioctl(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
>
> extern void __vfio_platform_register_reset(struct vfio_platform_reset_node *n);
> extern void vfio_platform_unregister_reset(const char *compat,
> + const char *acpihid,
> vfio_platform_reset_fn_t fn);
> -#define vfio_platform_register_reset(__compat, __reset) \
> -static struct vfio_platform_reset_node __reset ## _node = { \
> - .owner = THIS_MODULE, \
> - .compat = __compat, \
> - .reset = __reset, \
> -}; \
> +
> +#define vfio_platform_register_reset(__compat, __acpihid, __reset) \
> +static struct vfio_platform_reset_node __reset ## _node = { \
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE, \
> + .compat = __compat, \
> + .acpihid = __acpihid, \
> + .reset = __reset, \
> +}; \
> __vfio_platform_register_reset(&__reset ## _node)
>
> -#define module_vfio_reset_handler(compat, reset) \
> -MODULE_ALIAS("vfio-reset:" compat); \
> -static int __init reset ## _module_init(void) \
> -{ \
> - vfio_platform_register_reset(compat, reset); \
> - return 0; \
> -}; \
> -static void __exit reset ## _module_exit(void) \
> -{ \
> - vfio_platform_unregister_reset(compat, reset); \
> -}; \
> -module_init(reset ## _module_init); \
> +#define VFIO_PLATFORM_MODULE_ALIAS(name) \
> + MODULE_ALIAS("vfio-reset:" name)
> +
> +#define module_vfio_reset_handler(compat, acpihid, reset) \
> +static int __init reset ## _module_init(void) \
> +{ \
> + vfio_platform_register_reset(compat, acpihid, reset); \
> + return 0; \
> +}; \
> +static void __exit reset ## _module_exit(void) \
> +{ \
> + vfio_platform_unregister_reset(compat, acpihid, reset); \
> +}; \
> +module_init(reset ## _module_init); \
> module_exit(reset ## _module_exit)
>
> #endif /* VFIO_PLATFORM_PRIVATE_H */
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-10 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 15:33 [PATCH 1/2] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the reset driver Sinan Kaya
2016-03-08 15:33 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-08 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfio, platform: add QTI HIDMA " Sinan Kaya
2016-03-08 15:33 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-08 15:37 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfio, platform: add support for ACPI while detecting the " Sinan Kaya
2016-03-08 15:37 ` Sinan Kaya
[not found] ` <56DEF1BE.8010701-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-10 7:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-03-10 7:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-03-10 7:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-03-10 17:00 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-10 17:00 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-10 17:00 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-10 10:11 ` Eric Auger [this message]
2016-03-10 10:11 ` Eric Auger
2016-03-10 17:13 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-10 17:13 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-11 3:48 ` Eric Auger
2016-03-11 3:48 ` Eric Auger
2016-03-11 16:09 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-03-11 16:09 ` Sinan Kaya
[not found] ` <56E1AB38.8020702-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-11 4:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-03-11 4:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-03-11 4:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2016-03-11 4:05 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56E14858.9050401@linaro.org \
--to=eric.auger@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=shankerd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vikrams@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.