* [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs [not found] ` <56E91CC8.9060907@dest-unreach.org> @ 2016-04-12 17:53 ` Khem Raj 2016-04-12 21:05 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2016-04-12 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer, Bruce Ashfield FYI ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Gerhard Rieger <gerhard@dest-unreach.org> Date: Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:43 AM Subject: Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> Thank you, I will check this patch! - Gerhard Am 15.03.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Khem Raj: > Use cfsetispeed(), cfsetospeed(), cfgetispeed, and cfgetospeed() > instead of operating on c_ispeed and c_ospeed termios structure > members directly because they are not guaranteed to exist on all > libc implementations > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> > --- > xioinitialize.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xioinitialize.c b/xioinitialize.c > index 9f50155..632ca4c 100644 > --- a/xioinitialize.c > +++ b/xioinitialize.c > @@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ int xioinitialize(void) { > #if HAVE_TERMIOS_ISPEED && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != -1) > #if defined(ISPEED_OFFSET) && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) > #if defined(OSPEED_OFFSET) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != -1) > - tdata.termarg.c_ispeed = 0x56789abc; > - tdata.termarg.c_ospeed = 0x6789abcd; > - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ispeed == tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); > - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ospeed == tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); > + cfsetispeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x56789abc); > + cfsetospeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x6789abcd); > + assert(cfgetispeed(&tdata.termarg) == tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); > + assert(cfgetospeed(&tdata.termarg) == tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); > #endif > #endif > #endif > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs 2016-04-12 17:53 ` [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs Khem Raj @ 2016-04-12 21:05 ` Bruce Ashfield 2016-04-12 22:20 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2016-04-12 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj, Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On 2016-04-12 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > FYI Thanks. I can also confirm that when I dropped the patch, I'm back up and running assertion free. Bruce > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Gerhard Rieger <gerhard@dest-unreach.org> > Date: Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:43 AM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs > To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> > > > Thank you, I will check this patch! > - Gerhard > > > Am 15.03.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Khem Raj: >> Use cfsetispeed(), cfsetospeed(), cfgetispeed, and cfgetospeed() >> instead of operating on c_ispeed and c_ospeed termios structure >> members directly because they are not guaranteed to exist on all >> libc implementations >> >> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >> --- >> xioinitialize.c | 8 ++++---- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/xioinitialize.c b/xioinitialize.c >> index 9f50155..632ca4c 100644 >> --- a/xioinitialize.c >> +++ b/xioinitialize.c >> @@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ int xioinitialize(void) { >> #if HAVE_TERMIOS_ISPEED && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != -1) >> #if defined(ISPEED_OFFSET) && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) >> #if defined(OSPEED_OFFSET) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != -1) >> - tdata.termarg.c_ispeed = 0x56789abc; >> - tdata.termarg.c_ospeed = 0x6789abcd; >> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ispeed == tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ospeed == tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >> + cfsetispeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x56789abc); >> + cfsetospeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x6789abcd); >> + assert(cfgetispeed(&tdata.termarg) == tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >> + assert(cfgetospeed(&tdata.termarg) == tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >> #endif >> #endif >> #endif >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs 2016-04-12 21:05 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2016-04-12 22:20 ` Khem Raj [not found] ` <CAMKF1srQ5ayOr3ha=YTTGBS-ovX8Ht41ODoNaSEHBGW9EfjFGA@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2016-04-12 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2071 bytes --] Since you have it reproduced. Can you check which of the api call is failing? On Apr 12, 2016 5:05 PM, "Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> wrote: > On 2016-04-12 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> FYI >> > > Thanks. I can also confirm that when I dropped the patch, I'm > back up and running assertion free. > > Bruce > > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Gerhard Rieger <gerhard@dest-unreach.org> >> Date: Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:43 AM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs >> To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >> >> >> Thank you, I will check this patch! >> - Gerhard >> >> >> Am 15.03.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Khem Raj: >> >>> Use cfsetispeed(), cfsetospeed(), cfgetispeed, and cfgetospeed() >>> instead of operating on c_ispeed and c_ospeed termios structure >>> members directly because they are not guaranteed to exist on all >>> libc implementations >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> xioinitialize.c | 8 ++++---- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/xioinitialize.c b/xioinitialize.c >>> index 9f50155..632ca4c 100644 >>> --- a/xioinitialize.c >>> +++ b/xioinitialize.c >>> @@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ int xioinitialize(void) { >>> #if HAVE_TERMIOS_ISPEED && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != >>> -1) >>> #if defined(ISPEED_OFFSET) && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) >>> #if defined(OSPEED_OFFSET) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != -1) >>> - tdata.termarg.c_ispeed = 0x56789abc; >>> - tdata.termarg.c_ospeed = 0x6789abcd; >>> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ispeed == tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >>> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ospeed == tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >>> + cfsetispeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x56789abc); >>> + cfsetospeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x6789abcd); >>> + assert(cfgetispeed(&tdata.termarg) == >>> tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >>> + assert(cfgetospeed(&tdata.termarg) == >>> tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >>> #endif >>> #endif >>> #endif >>> >>> > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2962 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAMKF1srQ5ayOr3ha=YTTGBS-ovX8Ht41ODoNaSEHBGW9EfjFGA@mail.gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <CAMKF1sqBwbkHWQBBzX8jbK0SoZtcMr6MO2ZSZ9dcMJJns6x+eQ@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs [not found] ` <CAMKF1sqBwbkHWQBBzX8jbK0SoZtcMr6MO2ZSZ9dcMJJns6x+eQ@mail.gmail.com> @ 2016-04-12 22:33 ` Khem Raj 2016-04-13 15:57 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2016-04-12 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2320 bytes --] I think I see the problem now. The constant should be converted to use Bnn values. When calling the baudrate apis. I will send a patch for you to test once I am close to computer On Apr 12, 2016 6:20 PM, "Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: Since you have it reproduced. Can you check which of the api call is failing? On Apr 12, 2016 5:05 PM, "Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> wrote: > On 2016-04-12 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >> FYI >> > > Thanks. I can also confirm that when I dropped the patch, I'm > back up and running assertion free. > > Bruce > > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Gerhard Rieger <gerhard@dest-unreach.org> >> Date: Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:43 AM >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs >> To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >> >> >> Thank you, I will check this patch! >> - Gerhard >> >> >> Am 15.03.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Khem Raj: >> >>> Use cfsetispeed(), cfsetospeed(), cfgetispeed, and cfgetospeed() >>> instead of operating on c_ispeed and c_ospeed termios structure >>> members directly because they are not guaranteed to exist on all >>> libc implementations >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >>> --- >>> xioinitialize.c | 8 ++++---- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/xioinitialize.c b/xioinitialize.c >>> index 9f50155..632ca4c 100644 >>> --- a/xioinitialize.c >>> +++ b/xioinitialize.c >>> @@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ int xioinitialize(void) { >>> #if HAVE_TERMIOS_ISPEED && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != >>> -1) >>> #if defined(ISPEED_OFFSET) && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) >>> #if defined(OSPEED_OFFSET) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != -1) >>> - tdata.termarg.c_ispeed = 0x56789abc; >>> - tdata.termarg.c_ospeed = 0x6789abcd; >>> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ispeed == tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >>> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ospeed == tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >>> + cfsetispeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x56789abc); >>> + cfsetospeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x6789abcd); >>> + assert(cfgetispeed(&tdata.termarg) == >>> tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >>> + assert(cfgetospeed(&tdata.termarg) == >>> tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >>> #endif >>> #endif >>> #endif >>> >>> > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3491 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs 2016-04-12 22:33 ` Khem Raj @ 2016-04-13 15:57 ` Khem Raj 2016-04-13 15:59 ` Bruce Ashfield 2016-04-13 17:15 ` Bruce Ashfield 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2016-04-13 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > I think I see the problem now. The constant should be converted to use Bnn > values. When calling the baudrate apis. I will send a patch for you to test > once I am close to computer I have sent a potential patch. http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-April/120229.html It worked on musl env that I had ready here. Can you test it with your env and make sure it works for you ? > > On Apr 12, 2016 6:20 PM, "Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: > > Since you have it reproduced. Can you check which of the api call is > failing? > > On Apr 12, 2016 5:05 PM, "Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> > wrote: >> >> On 2016-04-12 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>> >>> FYI >> >> >> Thanks. I can also confirm that when I dropped the patch, I'm >> back up and running assertion free. >> >> Bruce >> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Gerhard Rieger <gerhard@dest-unreach.org> >>> Date: Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:43 AM >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs >>> To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> Thank you, I will check this patch! >>> - Gerhard >>> >>> >>> Am 15.03.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Khem Raj: >>>> >>>> Use cfsetispeed(), cfsetospeed(), cfgetispeed, and cfgetospeed() >>>> instead of operating on c_ispeed and c_ospeed termios structure >>>> members directly because they are not guaranteed to exist on all >>>> libc implementations >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >>>> --- >>>> xioinitialize.c | 8 ++++---- >>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/xioinitialize.c b/xioinitialize.c >>>> index 9f50155..632ca4c 100644 >>>> --- a/xioinitialize.c >>>> +++ b/xioinitialize.c >>>> @@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ int xioinitialize(void) { >>>> #if HAVE_TERMIOS_ISPEED && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != >>>> -1) >>>> #if defined(ISPEED_OFFSET) && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) >>>> #if defined(OSPEED_OFFSET) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != -1) >>>> - tdata.termarg.c_ispeed = 0x56789abc; >>>> - tdata.termarg.c_ospeed = 0x6789abcd; >>>> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ispeed == tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >>>> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ospeed == tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >>>> + cfsetispeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x56789abc); >>>> + cfsetospeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x6789abcd); >>>> + assert(cfgetispeed(&tdata.termarg) == >>>> tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >>>> + assert(cfgetospeed(&tdata.termarg) == >>>> tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >>>> #endif >>>> #endif >>>> #endif >>>> >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs 2016-04-13 15:57 ` Khem Raj @ 2016-04-13 15:59 ` Bruce Ashfield 2016-04-13 17:15 ` Bruce Ashfield 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2016-04-13 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On 2016-04-13 11:57 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think I see the problem now. The constant should be converted to use Bnn >> values. When calling the baudrate apis. I will send a patch for you to test >> once I am close to computer > > I have sent a potential patch. > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-April/120229.html > > It worked on musl env that I had ready here. Can you test it > with your env and make sure it works for you ? Will do. Launching builds now. I'll follow up once I know one way or another. Bruce > > > > >> >> On Apr 12, 2016 6:20 PM, "Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Since you have it reproduced. Can you check which of the api call is >> failing? >> >> On Apr 12, 2016 5:05 PM, "Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 2016-04-12 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> >>>> FYI >>> >>> >>> Thanks. I can also confirm that when I dropped the patch, I'm >>> back up and running assertion free. >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Gerhard Rieger <gerhard@dest-unreach.org> >>>> Date: Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:43 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs >>>> To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you, I will check this patch! >>>> - Gerhard >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 15.03.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Khem Raj: >>>>> >>>>> Use cfsetispeed(), cfsetospeed(), cfgetispeed, and cfgetospeed() >>>>> instead of operating on c_ispeed and c_ospeed termios structure >>>>> members directly because they are not guaranteed to exist on all >>>>> libc implementations >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> xioinitialize.c | 8 ++++---- >>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/xioinitialize.c b/xioinitialize.c >>>>> index 9f50155..632ca4c 100644 >>>>> --- a/xioinitialize.c >>>>> +++ b/xioinitialize.c >>>>> @@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ int xioinitialize(void) { >>>>> #if HAVE_TERMIOS_ISPEED && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != >>>>> -1) >>>>> #if defined(ISPEED_OFFSET) && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) >>>>> #if defined(OSPEED_OFFSET) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != -1) >>>>> - tdata.termarg.c_ispeed = 0x56789abc; >>>>> - tdata.termarg.c_ospeed = 0x6789abcd; >>>>> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ispeed == tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >>>>> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ospeed == tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >>>>> + cfsetispeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x56789abc); >>>>> + cfsetospeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x6789abcd); >>>>> + assert(cfgetispeed(&tdata.termarg) == >>>>> tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >>>>> + assert(cfgetospeed(&tdata.termarg) == >>>>> tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >>>>> #endif >>>>> #endif >>>>> #endif >>>>> >>> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs 2016-04-13 15:57 ` Khem Raj 2016-04-13 15:59 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2016-04-13 17:15 ` Bruce Ashfield 2016-04-13 17:17 ` Khem Raj 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Bruce Ashfield @ 2016-04-13 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Khem Raj; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On 2016-04-13 11:57 AM, Khem Raj wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think I see the problem now. The constant should be converted to use Bnn >> values. When calling the baudrate apis. I will send a patch for you to test >> once I am close to computer > > I have sent a potential patch. > > http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-April/120229.html > > It worked on musl env that I had ready here. Can you test it > with your env and make sure it works for you ? confirmed. I reverted my local change, applied this and socat is working without the assert. Bruce > > > > >> >> On Apr 12, 2016 6:20 PM, "Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Since you have it reproduced. Can you check which of the api call is >> failing? >> >> On Apr 12, 2016 5:05 PM, "Bruce Ashfield" <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 2016-04-12 1:53 PM, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> >>>> FYI >>> >>> >>> Thanks. I can also confirm that when I dropped the patch, I'm >>> back up and running assertion free. >>> >>> Bruce >>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: Gerhard Rieger <gerhard@dest-unreach.org> >>>> Date: Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:43 AM >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs >>>> To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you, I will check this patch! >>>> - Gerhard >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 15.03.2016 um 22:39 schrieb Khem Raj: >>>>> >>>>> Use cfsetispeed(), cfsetospeed(), cfgetispeed, and cfgetospeed() >>>>> instead of operating on c_ispeed and c_ospeed termios structure >>>>> members directly because they are not guaranteed to exist on all >>>>> libc implementations >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> >>>>> --- >>>>> xioinitialize.c | 8 ++++---- >>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>> diff --git a/xioinitialize.c b/xioinitialize.c >>>>> index 9f50155..632ca4c 100644 >>>>> --- a/xioinitialize.c >>>>> +++ b/xioinitialize.c >>>>> @@ -65,10 +65,10 @@ int xioinitialize(void) { >>>>> #if HAVE_TERMIOS_ISPEED && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != >>>>> -1) >>>>> #if defined(ISPEED_OFFSET) && (ISPEED_OFFSET != -1) >>>>> #if defined(OSPEED_OFFSET) && (OSPEED_OFFSET != -1) >>>>> - tdata.termarg.c_ispeed = 0x56789abc; >>>>> - tdata.termarg.c_ospeed = 0x6789abcd; >>>>> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ispeed == tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >>>>> - assert(tdata.termarg.c_ospeed == tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >>>>> + cfsetispeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x56789abc); >>>>> + cfsetospeed(&tdata.termarg, 0x6789abcd); >>>>> + assert(cfgetispeed(&tdata.termarg) == >>>>> tdata.speeds[ISPEED_OFFSET]); >>>>> + assert(cfgetospeed(&tdata.termarg) == >>>>> tdata.speeds[OSPEED_OFFSET]); >>>>> #endif >>>>> #endif >>>>> #endif >>>>> >>> >> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs 2016-04-13 17:15 ` Bruce Ashfield @ 2016-04-13 17:17 ` Khem Raj 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Khem Raj @ 2016-04-13 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Ashfield; +Cc: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield@windriver.com> wrote: > On 2016-04-13 11:57 AM, Khem Raj wrote: >> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think I see the problem now. The constant should be converted to use >>> Bnn >>> values. When calling the baudrate apis. I will send a patch for you to >>> test >>> once I am close to computer >> >> >> I have sent a potential patch. >> >> >> http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2016-April/120229.html >> >> It worked on musl env that I had ready here. Can you test it >> with your env and make sure it works for you ? > > > confirmed. I reverted my local change, applied this and socat is > working without the assert. Thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-13 17:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1458077979-23303-1-git-send-email-raj.khem@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <56E91CC8.9060907@dest-unreach.org>
2016-04-12 17:53 ` [PATCH] Access c_ispeed and c_ospeed via APIs Khem Raj
2016-04-12 21:05 ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-04-12 22:20 ` Khem Raj
[not found] ` <CAMKF1srQ5ayOr3ha=YTTGBS-ovX8Ht41ODoNaSEHBGW9EfjFGA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAMKF1sqBwbkHWQBBzX8jbK0SoZtcMr6MO2ZSZ9dcMJJns6x+eQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-04-12 22:33 ` Khem Raj
2016-04-13 15:57 ` Khem Raj
2016-04-13 15:59 ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-04-13 17:15 ` Bruce Ashfield
2016-04-13 17:17 ` Khem Raj
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.