* Nat types implemented by IPTABLES - STUN issue
@ 2005-01-05 19:28 Leandro Melo de Sales
2005-01-06 1:19 ` Tobias DiPasquale
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leandro Melo de Sales @ 2005-01-05 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Hi folks,
I'm using an implementation for STUN (RFC 3489:
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3489.html) written in JAVA
(http://stun4j.dev.java.net/).
In this RFC, they describes some nats variations (see STUN RFC
chapter 5) some of them supported by STUN specification, like: Full
Cone, Restricted Cone, Port Restricted Cone and Symmetric.
So, I have a simple question for iptables developers: what types of
nat iptables supports?
Thank you in advanced...
Leandro.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Nat types implemented by IPTABLES - STUN issue
2005-01-05 19:28 Nat types implemented by IPTABLES - STUN issue Leandro Melo de Sales
@ 2005-01-06 1:19 ` Tobias DiPasquale
2005-01-06 6:08 ` Leandro Melo de Sales
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tobias DiPasquale @ 2005-01-06 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leandro Melo de Sales, nf-devel
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:28:42 -0300, Leandro Melo de Sales
<leandroal@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm using an implementation for STUN (RFC 3489:
> http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3489.html) written in JAVA
> (http://stun4j.dev.java.net/).
> In this RFC, they describes some nats variations (see STUN RFC
> chapter 5) some of them supported by STUN specification, like: Full
> Cone, Restricted Cone, Port Restricted Cone and Symmetric.
> So, I have a simple question for iptables developers: what types of
> nat iptables supports?
Symmetric only.
--
[ Tobias DiPasquale ]
0x636f6465736c696e67657240676d61696c2e636f6d
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Nat types implemented by IPTABLES - STUN issue
2005-01-06 1:19 ` Tobias DiPasquale
@ 2005-01-06 6:08 ` Leandro Melo de Sales
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Leandro Melo de Sales @ 2005-01-06 6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Hi....
So, I can't understand. The STUN RFC says that STUN doesn't support
Symmetric nat. I'm behind a iptables firewall with nat for UDP packets
and I can run some tests successfully. Are you sure that iptables just
cover symmetric nat? If yes, I really need to check that situation.
Leandro.
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 20:19:43 -0500, Tobias DiPasquale
<codeslinger@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:28:42 -0300, Leandro Melo de Sales
> <leandroal@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm using an implementation for STUN (RFC 3489:
> > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3489.html) written in JAVA
> > (http://stun4j.dev.java.net/).
> > In this RFC, they describes some nats variations (see STUN RFC
> > chapter 5) some of them supported by STUN specification, like: Full
> > Cone, Restricted Cone, Port Restricted Cone and Symmetric.
> > So, I have a simple question for iptables developers: what types of
> > nat iptables supports?
>
> Symmetric only.
>
> --
> [ Tobias DiPasquale ]
> 0x636f6465736c696e67657240676d61696c2e636f6d
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-01-06 6:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-01-05 19:28 Nat types implemented by IPTABLES - STUN issue Leandro Melo de Sales
2005-01-06 1:19 ` Tobias DiPasquale
2005-01-06 6:08 ` Leandro Melo de Sales
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.