From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 3/3] iommu: arm-smmu-impl: Add sdm845 implementation hook
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:43:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68913df77d45fc70f7cf475bfd0f558a@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d82d294.1c69fb81.23c8c.8c61@mx.google.com>
On 2019-09-19 06:27, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2019-09-17 02:45:04)
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
>> b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
>> index 3f88cd078dd5..d62da270f430 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
>> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
>>
>> #include "arm-smmu.h"
>>
>> -
>> static int arm_smmu_gr0_ns(int offset)
>> {
>> switch(offset) {
>
> Why is this hunk still around?
I remember correcting this in previous version but somehow slipped in
this version. Will correct it.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..24c071c1d8b0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> [...]
>> +struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device
>> *smmu)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu;
>> +
>> + qsmmu = devm_kzalloc(smmu->dev, sizeof(*qsmmu), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!qsmmu)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> + qsmmu->smmu = *smmu;
>> +
>> + qsmmu->smmu.impl = &qcom_smmu_impl;
>> + devm_kfree(smmu->dev, smmu);
>
> This copy is interesting but OK I guess cavium does it.
>
This is from nvidia impl since Robin pointed me at its implementation.
>> +
>> + return &qsmmu->smmu;
>> +}
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 3/3] iommu: arm-smmu-impl: Add sdm845 implementation hook
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:43:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68913df77d45fc70f7cf475bfd0f558a@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d82d294.1c69fb81.23c8c.8c61@mx.google.com>
On 2019-09-19 06:27, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2019-09-17 02:45:04)
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
>> b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
>> index 3f88cd078dd5..d62da270f430 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-impl.c
>> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
>>
>> #include "arm-smmu.h"
>>
>> -
>> static int arm_smmu_gr0_ns(int offset)
>> {
>> switch(offset) {
>
> Why is this hunk still around?
I remember correcting this in previous version but somehow slipped in
this version. Will correct it.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..24c071c1d8b0
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> [...]
>> +struct arm_smmu_device *qcom_smmu_impl_init(struct arm_smmu_device
>> *smmu)
>> +{
>> + struct qcom_smmu *qsmmu;
>> +
>> + qsmmu = devm_kzalloc(smmu->dev, sizeof(*qsmmu), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!qsmmu)
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> +
>> + qsmmu->smmu = *smmu;
>> +
>> + qsmmu->smmu.impl = &qcom_smmu_impl;
>> + devm_kfree(smmu->dev, smmu);
>
> This copy is interesting but OK I guess cavium does it.
>
This is from nvidia impl since Robin pointed me at its implementation.
>> +
>> + return &qsmmu->smmu;
>> +}
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-19 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-17 9:45 [PATCHv6 0/3] QCOM smmu-500 wait-for-safe handling for sdm845 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-17 9:45 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-17 9:45 ` [PATCHv6 1/3] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Add atomic version of qcom_scm_call Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-17 9:45 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19 0:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19 0:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-17 9:45 ` [PATCHv6 2/3] firmware/qcom_scm: Add scm call to handle smmu errata Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-17 9:45 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19 0:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19 0:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-17 9:45 ` [PATCHv6 3/3] iommu: arm-smmu-impl: Add sdm845 implementation hook Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-17 9:45 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19 0:25 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-09-19 0:25 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-09-19 0:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19 0:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19 3:18 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19 3:18 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19 18:54 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19 18:54 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19 20:00 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19 20:00 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-20 7:54 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-20 7:54 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19 0:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19 0:57 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19 3:13 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan [this message]
2019-09-19 3:13 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68913df77d45fc70f7cf475bfd0f558a@codeaurora.org \
--to=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.