All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 3/3] iommu: arm-smmu-impl: Add sdm845 implementation hook
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:48:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a45e8fb6fe1a8cc914fedbfac65af009@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190919002501.GA20859@builder>

On 2019-09-19 05:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> In the transition to this new design we lost the ability to
> enable/disable the safe toggle per board, which according to Vivek
> would result in some issue with Cheza.
> 
> Can you confirm that this is okay? (Or introduce the DT property for
> enabling the safe_toggle logic?)
> 

Hmm, I don't remember Vivek telling about any issue on Cheza because of 
this logic.
But I will test this on Cheza and let you know.

Thanks,
Sai

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation






WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 3/3] iommu: arm-smmu-impl: Add sdm845 implementation hook
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 08:48:28 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a45e8fb6fe1a8cc914fedbfac65af009@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190919002501.GA20859@builder>

On 2019-09-19 05:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> In the transition to this new design we lost the ability to
> enable/disable the safe toggle per board, which according to Vivek
> would result in some issue with Cheza.
> 
> Can you confirm that this is okay? (Or introduce the DT property for
> enabling the safe_toggle logic?)
> 

Hmm, I don't remember Vivek telling about any issue on Cheza because of 
this logic.
But I will test this on Cheza and let you know.

Thanks,
Sai

-- 
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a 
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation





_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-09-19  3:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-17  9:45 [PATCHv6 0/3] QCOM smmu-500 wait-for-safe handling for sdm845 Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-17  9:45 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-17  9:45 ` [PATCHv6 1/3] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Add atomic version of qcom_scm_call Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-17  9:45   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19  0:50   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19  0:50     ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-17  9:45 ` [PATCHv6 2/3] firmware/qcom_scm: Add scm call to handle smmu errata Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-17  9:45   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19  0:53   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19  0:53     ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-17  9:45 ` [PATCHv6 3/3] iommu: arm-smmu-impl: Add sdm845 implementation hook Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-17  9:45   ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19  0:25   ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-09-19  0:25     ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-09-19  0:52     ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19  0:52       ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19  3:18     ` Sai Prakash Ranjan [this message]
2019-09-19  3:18       ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19 18:54       ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19 18:54         ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19 20:00         ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19 20:00           ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-20  7:54           ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-20  7:54             ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19  0:57   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19  0:57     ` Stephen Boyd
2019-09-19  3:13     ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-09-19  3:13       ` Sai Prakash Ranjan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a45e8fb6fe1a8cc914fedbfac65af009@codeaurora.org \
    --to=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.