From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
aviro@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, chrisw@sous-sol.org, jmorris@namei.org
Subject: Re: Security issues with local filesystem caching
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:34:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7451.1161970450@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1161968942.1306.87.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:
> > You start the cache by mounting it:
> >
> > mount -t cachefs /dev/hdx9 /cachefs
> >
> > Then it's online. However, you might want to check that whoever's calling
> > mount has permission to bring a cache online...
>
> Hmmm...that raises a separate issue - how does SELinux label cachefs
> inodes? Does cachefs support xattrs? Other option is to use a mount
> context (mount -o context=...) to apply a single context to all inodes
> within it.
There are only two inodes publically available through cachefs - the root dir
and a file of statistics - and they're both read only. Everything else, for
the moment, is strictly internal and unavailable to userspace. In fact, there
may not be any other inodes.
> Where exactly is the cachefs code available?
It'll need a little bit of work to make it compilable again; but I can probably
get you a copy on Monday. I've been concentrating on CacheFiles.
> I'm also unclear on where you establish the binding between the files
> being cached and the cache. What specifies that e.g. a given NFS mount
> should be backed to a given cache? We need to be able to control that
> relationship too, to establish that the cache is being protected
> adequately for the source data.
Yes. I haven't worked that one out yet. Currently it's not a problem as only
CacheFiles is available at the moment, and that currently only supports one
cache.
But I have an idea that I need to work on to make it possible to associate
directories and files with caches (or other useful parameters).
> > (1) Permission to bring a cache online or to take a cache offline.
>
> At present, this will show up as the usual checking on mount (security
> hooks in do_mount and vfs_kern_mount) and on umount (security hook in
> do_umount) by SELinux. I'm not sure whether you need anything specific
> to the cache.
That doesn't apply to CacheFiles, but okay; we can always add it later if we
decide we want it.
David
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
aviro@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, chrisw@sous-sol.org, jmorris@namei.org
Subject: Re: Security issues with local filesystem caching
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:34:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7451.1161970450@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1161968942.1306.87.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> wrote:
> > You start the cache by mounting it:
> >
> > mount -t cachefs /dev/hdx9 /cachefs
> >
> > Then it's online. However, you might want to check that whoever's calling
> > mount has permission to bring a cache online...
>
> Hmmm...that raises a separate issue - how does SELinux label cachefs
> inodes? Does cachefs support xattrs? Other option is to use a mount
> context (mount -o context=...) to apply a single context to all inodes
> within it.
There are only two inodes publically available through cachefs - the root dir
and a file of statistics - and they're both read only. Everything else, for
the moment, is strictly internal and unavailable to userspace. In fact, there
may not be any other inodes.
> Where exactly is the cachefs code available?
It'll need a little bit of work to make it compilable again; but I can probably
get you a copy on Monday. I've been concentrating on CacheFiles.
> I'm also unclear on where you establish the binding between the files
> being cached and the cache. What specifies that e.g. a given NFS mount
> should be backed to a given cache? We need to be able to control that
> relationship too, to establish that the cache is being protected
> adequately for the source data.
Yes. I haven't worked that one out yet. Currently it's not a problem as only
CacheFiles is available at the moment, and that currently only supports one
cache.
But I have an idea that I need to work on to make it possible to associate
directories and files with caches (or other useful parameters).
> > (1) Permission to bring a cache online or to take a cache offline.
>
> At present, this will show up as the usual checking on mount (security
> hooks in do_mount and vfs_kern_mount) and on umount (security hook in
> do_umount) by SELinux. I'm not sure whether you need anything specific
> to the cache.
That doesn't apply to CacheFiles, but okay; we can always add it later if we
decide we want it.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-27 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-25 10:14 Security issues with local filesystem caching David Howells
2006-10-25 10:14 ` David Howells
2006-10-25 16:52 ` Nate Diller
2006-10-25 16:52 ` Nate Diller
2006-10-25 16:48 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-10-25 17:21 ` David Howells
2006-10-25 17:21 ` David Howells
2006-10-25 17:42 ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-10-25 18:15 ` David Howells
2006-10-25 18:15 ` David Howells
2006-10-25 20:21 ` Josef Sipek
2006-10-25 20:28 ` Josef Sipek
2006-10-26 9:56 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 9:56 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 15:54 ` Josef Sipek
2006-10-25 21:12 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-25 21:12 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-26 10:40 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 10:40 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 12:51 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-26 12:51 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-26 16:04 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 16:04 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 16:34 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-26 16:34 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-26 17:09 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 17:09 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 17:45 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-26 17:45 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-26 22:53 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 22:53 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 14:48 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-27 14:48 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-27 15:42 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 15:42 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 16:10 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-27 16:10 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-27 16:25 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 16:25 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 17:09 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-27 17:09 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-27 17:34 ` David Howells [this message]
2006-10-27 17:34 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 14:41 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 14:41 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 15:03 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-27 16:12 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 16:37 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-27 17:28 ` David Howells
2006-10-27 18:10 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-30 15:13 ` David Howells
2006-10-31 16:19 ` David Howells
2006-10-31 16:51 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-10-31 19:21 ` David Howells
2006-10-25 23:37 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-26 0:32 ` Al Viro
2006-10-26 10:45 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 10:45 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 10:54 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-26 9:14 ` Jan Dittmer
2006-10-26 10:55 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 10:55 ` David Howells
2006-10-26 11:52 ` Alan Cox
2006-10-31 21:26 ` David Howells
2006-10-31 21:26 ` David Howells
2006-11-01 13:28 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-01 13:28 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-01 15:34 ` David Howells
2006-11-01 15:34 ` David Howells
2006-11-01 15:58 ` Karl MacMillan
2006-11-01 15:58 ` Karl MacMillan
2006-11-01 17:45 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-01 17:45 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-02 16:29 ` Karl MacMillan
2006-11-02 16:29 ` Karl MacMillan
2006-11-02 18:04 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-02 18:04 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-01 17:30 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-01 17:30 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-02 17:16 ` David Howells
2006-11-02 17:16 ` David Howells
2006-11-02 19:49 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-02 20:38 ` David Howells
2006-11-02 20:38 ` David Howells
2006-11-02 21:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-03 10:27 ` David Howells
2006-11-03 10:27 ` David Howells
2006-11-03 13:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-03 15:23 ` David Howells
2006-11-03 15:23 ` David Howells
2006-11-03 17:30 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-14 19:22 ` David Howells
2006-11-14 19:22 ` David Howells
2006-11-15 14:05 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-15 15:28 ` David Howells
2006-11-15 15:28 ` David Howells
2006-11-15 16:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-11-15 18:17 ` David Howells
2006-11-15 18:17 ` David Howells
2006-11-03 15:33 ` David Howells
2006-11-03 15:33 ` David Howells
2006-11-02 20:33 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-02 20:33 ` Stephen Smalley
2006-11-02 21:05 ` David Howells
2006-11-02 21:05 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7451.1161970450@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.