All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: shan.gavin@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrew.jones@linux.dev,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, yihyu@redhat.com,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Make rseq compatible with glibc-2.35
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 18:45:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7844e3fa-e49e-de75-e424-e82d3a023dd6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8735e6ncxw.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>

Hi Florian,

On 8/9/22 4:33 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
>> index a54d4d05a058..acb1bf1f06b3 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>   #include <string.h>
>>   #include <signal.h>
>>   #include <syscall.h>
>> +#include <dlfcn.h>
>>   #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>>   #include <sys/sysinfo.h>
>>   #include <asm/barrier.h>
> 
> I'm surprised that there isn't a Makefile update to link with -ldl
> (still required for glibc 2.33 and earlier).
> 

In next revision, I will add '-ldl' into tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.


>> @@ -36,6 +37,8 @@ static __thread volatile struct rseq __rseq = {
>>    */
>>   #define NR_TASK_MIGRATIONS 100000
>>   
>> +static bool __rseq_ownership;
>> +static volatile struct rseq *__rseq_info;
>>   static pthread_t migration_thread;
>>   static cpu_set_t possible_mask;
>>   static int min_cpu, max_cpu;
>> @@ -49,11 +52,33 @@ static void guest_code(void)
>>   		GUEST_SYNC(0);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void sys_rseq_ownership(void)
>> +{
>> +	long *offset;
>> +	unsigned int *size, *flags;
>> +
>> +	offset = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_offset");
>> +	size = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_size");
>> +	flags = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_flags");
>> +
>> +	if (offset && size && *size && flags) {
>> +		__rseq_ownership = false;
>> +		__rseq_info = (struct rseq *)((uintptr_t)__builtin_thread_pointer() +
>> +					      *offset);
> 
> __builtin_thread_pointer doesn't work on all architectures/GCC versions.
> Is this a problem for selftests?
> 

It's a problem as the test case is running on all architectures. I think I
need introduce our own __builtin_thread_pointer() for where it's not
supported: (1) PowerPC  (2) x86 without GCC 11

Please let me know if I still have missed cases where __buitin_thread_pointer()
isn't supported?

Thanks,
Gavin

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
	andrew.jones@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, yihyu@redhat.com,
	shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Make rseq compatible with glibc-2.35
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 18:45:26 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7844e3fa-e49e-de75-e424-e82d3a023dd6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8735e6ncxw.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>

Hi Florian,

On 8/9/22 4:33 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
>> index a54d4d05a058..acb1bf1f06b3 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/rseq_test.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>   #include <string.h>
>>   #include <signal.h>
>>   #include <syscall.h>
>> +#include <dlfcn.h>
>>   #include <sys/ioctl.h>
>>   #include <sys/sysinfo.h>
>>   #include <asm/barrier.h>
> 
> I'm surprised that there isn't a Makefile update to link with -ldl
> (still required for glibc 2.33 and earlier).
> 

In next revision, I will add '-ldl' into tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile.


>> @@ -36,6 +37,8 @@ static __thread volatile struct rseq __rseq = {
>>    */
>>   #define NR_TASK_MIGRATIONS 100000
>>   
>> +static bool __rseq_ownership;
>> +static volatile struct rseq *__rseq_info;
>>   static pthread_t migration_thread;
>>   static cpu_set_t possible_mask;
>>   static int min_cpu, max_cpu;
>> @@ -49,11 +52,33 @@ static void guest_code(void)
>>   		GUEST_SYNC(0);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static void sys_rseq_ownership(void)
>> +{
>> +	long *offset;
>> +	unsigned int *size, *flags;
>> +
>> +	offset = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_offset");
>> +	size = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_size");
>> +	flags = dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "__rseq_flags");
>> +
>> +	if (offset && size && *size && flags) {
>> +		__rseq_ownership = false;
>> +		__rseq_info = (struct rseq *)((uintptr_t)__builtin_thread_pointer() +
>> +					      *offset);
> 
> __builtin_thread_pointer doesn't work on all architectures/GCC versions.
> Is this a problem for selftests?
> 

It's a problem as the test case is running on all architectures. I think I
need introduce our own __builtin_thread_pointer() for where it's not
supported: (1) PowerPC  (2) x86 without GCC 11

Please let me know if I still have missed cases where __buitin_thread_pointer()
isn't supported?

Thanks,
Gavin


  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-09  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-09  6:06 [PATCH 0/2] kvm/selftests: Two rseq_test fixes Gavin Shan
2022-08-09  6:06 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09  6:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Make rseq compatible with glibc-2.35 Gavin Shan
2022-08-09  6:06   ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09  6:33   ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09  6:33     ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09  8:45     ` Gavin Shan [this message]
2022-08-09  8:45       ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09  7:16       ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09  7:16         ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09  9:27         ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09  9:27           ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 12:21           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-09 12:21             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-09 13:44             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-09 13:44               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-09 21:38               ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-09 21:38                 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-10  0:37                 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10  0:37                   ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 12:29                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 12:29                     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 12:35                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10 12:35                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10 12:13                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 12:13                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 23:52                   ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 23:52                     ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10  9:14             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10  9:14               ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10  9:59               ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10  9:59                 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 12:17               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 12:17                 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 12:19                 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10 12:19                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10 23:34                   ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 23:34                     ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09  6:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Use getcpu() instead of sched_getcpu() in rseq_test Gavin Shan
2022-08-09  6:06   ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09  6:35   ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09  6:35     ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09  7:17     ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09  7:17       ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09  8:46       ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09  8:46         ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 20:53         ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-09 20:53           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-10  0:45           ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10  0:45             ` Gavin Shan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7844e3fa-e49e-de75-e424-e82d3a023dd6@redhat.com \
    --to=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
    --cc=yihyu@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.