From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: shan.gavin@gmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andrew.jones@linux.dev,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, yihyu@redhat.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Use getcpu() instead of sched_getcpu() in rseq_test
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 08:35:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y1vxncv1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220809060627.115847-3-gshan@redhat.com> (Gavin Shan's message of "Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:06:27 +0800")
* Gavin Shan:
> sched_getcpu() is glibc dependent and it can simply return the CPU
> ID from the registered rseq information, as Florian Weimer pointed.
> In this case, it's pointless to compare the return value from
> sched_getcpu() and that fetched from the registered rseq information.
>
> Fix the issue by replacing sched_getcpu() with getcpu(), as Florian
> suggested. The comments are modified accordingly.
Note that getcpu was added in glibc 2.29, so perhaps you need to perform
a direct system call?
Thanks,
Florian
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev,
andrew.jones@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, yihyu@redhat.com,
shan.gavin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Use getcpu() instead of sched_getcpu() in rseq_test
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2022 08:35:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y1vxncv1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220809060627.115847-3-gshan@redhat.com> (Gavin Shan's message of "Tue, 9 Aug 2022 14:06:27 +0800")
* Gavin Shan:
> sched_getcpu() is glibc dependent and it can simply return the CPU
> ID from the registered rseq information, as Florian Weimer pointed.
> In this case, it's pointless to compare the return value from
> sched_getcpu() and that fetched from the registered rseq information.
>
> Fix the issue by replacing sched_getcpu() with getcpu(), as Florian
> suggested. The comments are modified accordingly.
Note that getcpu was added in glibc 2.29, so perhaps you need to perform
a direct system call?
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-09 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-09 6:06 [PATCH 0/2] kvm/selftests: Two rseq_test fixes Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 6:06 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 6:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: selftests: Make rseq compatible with glibc-2.35 Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 6:06 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 6:33 ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09 6:33 ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09 8:45 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 8:45 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 7:16 ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09 7:16 ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09 9:27 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 9:27 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 12:21 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-09 12:21 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-09 13:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-09 13:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-09 21:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-09 21:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-10 0:37 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 0:37 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 12:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 12:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 12:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10 12:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10 12:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 12:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 23:52 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 23:52 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 9:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10 9:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10 9:59 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 9:59 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 12:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 12:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-08-10 12:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10 12:19 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-08-10 23:34 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 23:34 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 6:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: selftests: Use getcpu() instead of sched_getcpu() in rseq_test Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 6:06 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 6:35 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2022-08-09 6:35 ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09 7:17 ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09 7:17 ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-09 8:46 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 8:46 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-09 20:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-09 20:53 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-08-10 0:45 ` Gavin Shan
2022-08-10 0:45 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y1vxncv1.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shan.gavin@gmail.com \
--cc=yihyu@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.