From: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Use default exponent for some tests
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:37:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85bjuuy7hp.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <858qpyog22.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 18:43:01 -0800, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:06:19 -0800, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> >
> > Use the default exponent for below tests:
> >
> > oa-tlb-validate
> > short-reads
> > stress-open-close
> > mmio-triggered-reports
>
> Please see discussion on this patch in the CI series here:
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/145042/
This is that discussion:
> >> > Why? Let's add a reason in the commit message, for all the patches, even
> >> > if, in this case, it might be "because it doesn't matter what exponent is
> >> > used".
> >>
> >> That's open for discussion in this review. My reasoning:
> >>
> >> Other than the stress-open-close, none of the other tests actually depend
> >> on the oa exponent, so we might as well use one value everywhere.
> >
> > Yeah that's what I thought.
> >
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Because these tests were ported from i915 I myself don't quite understand
> >> > why some of these tests do what the do. So it will help if we could
> >> > document why we are making the changes we are making, and, when needed,
> >> > what the effect of the changes is going to be.
> >>
> >> There is one patch on top of this series which should adjust the exponent
> >> value for all tests so that they run quickly on simulation. Maybe I should
> >> post the v2 with that patch so the context is clear, otherwise, I agree
> >> that the reason for these changes is unclear.
> >
> > Either way, or just state on the patch something like: "this would allow
> > these tests to run in a reasonable time on slower platforms".
>
> will do
> >
> > Oops, should have commented on the original series, but ended up commenting
> > on the CI series :/
>
> Either should be fine. Both series are identical except that the CI one
> forces 128MB buffer-size test and also runs on DG2.
Just fix up the commit message to include the "why":
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
>
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/intel/xe_oa.c | 16 ++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> > index e7d6ac5af..7e40e9257 100644
> > --- a/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> > +++ b/tests/intel/xe_oa.c
> > @@ -2316,7 +2316,6 @@ num_valid_reports_captured(struct intel_xe_oa_open_prop *param,
> > static void
> > test_oa_tlb_invalidate(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> > {
> > - int oa_exponent = max_oa_exponent_for_period_lte(30000000);
> > struct intel_xe_perf_metric_set *test_set = metric_set(hwe);
> > uint64_t properties[] = {
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_UNIT_ID, 0,
> > @@ -2324,7 +2323,7 @@ test_oa_tlb_invalidate(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> >
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_METRIC_SET, test_set->perf_oa_metrics_set,
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_FORMAT, __ff(test_set->perf_oa_format),
> > - DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_PERIOD_EXPONENT, oa_exponent,
> > + DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_PERIOD_EXPONENT, oa_exponent_default,
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_DISABLED, true,
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_ENGINE_INSTANCE, hwe->engine_instance,
> > };
> > @@ -2342,14 +2341,14 @@ test_oa_tlb_invalidate(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> > */
> > duration = 5LL * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> > num_reports1 = num_valid_reports_captured(¶m, &duration, test_set->perf_oa_format);
> > - num_expected_reports = duration / oa_exponent_to_ns(oa_exponent);
> > + num_expected_reports = duration / oa_exponent_to_ns(oa_exponent_default);
> > igt_debug("expected num reports = %d\n", num_expected_reports);
> > igt_debug("actual num reports = %d\n", num_reports1);
> > igt_assert(num_reports1 > 0.95 * num_expected_reports);
> >
> > duration = 5LL * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> > num_reports2 = num_valid_reports_captured(¶m, &duration, test_set->perf_oa_format);
> > - num_expected_reports = duration / oa_exponent_to_ns(oa_exponent);
> > + num_expected_reports = duration / oa_exponent_to_ns(oa_exponent_default);
> > igt_debug("expected num reports = %d\n", num_expected_reports);
> > igt_debug("actual num reports = %d\n", num_reports2);
> > igt_assert(num_reports2 > 0.95 * num_expected_reports);
> > @@ -2738,7 +2737,6 @@ test_enable_disable(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> > static void
> > test_short_reads(void)
> > {
> > - int oa_exponent = max_oa_exponent_for_period_lte(5000);
> > uint64_t properties[] = {
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_UNIT_ID, 0,
> >
> > @@ -2748,7 +2746,7 @@ test_short_reads(void)
> > /* OA unit configuration */
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_METRIC_SET, default_test_set->perf_oa_metrics_set,
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_FORMAT, __ff(default_test_set->perf_oa_format),
> > - DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_PERIOD_EXPONENT, oa_exponent,
> > + DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_PERIOD_EXPONENT, oa_exponent_default,
> > };
> > struct intel_xe_oa_open_prop param = {
> > .num_properties = ARRAY_SIZE(properties) / 2,
> > @@ -3464,7 +3462,6 @@ test_stress_open_close(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> > load_helper_run(HIGH);
> >
> > igt_until_timeout(2) {
> > - int oa_exponent = 5; /* 5 micro seconds */
> > uint64_t properties[] = {
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_UNIT_ID, 0,
> >
> > @@ -3476,7 +3473,7 @@ test_stress_open_close(const struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> > /* OA unit configuration */
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_METRIC_SET, test_set->perf_oa_metrics_set,
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_FORMAT, __ff(test_set->perf_oa_format),
> > - DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_PERIOD_EXPONENT, oa_exponent,
> > + DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_PERIOD_EXPONENT, oa_exponent_default,
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_DISABLED, true,
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_ENGINE_INSTANCE, hwe->engine_instance,
> > };
> > @@ -3990,12 +3987,11 @@ static void
> > __test_mmio_triggered_reports(struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe)
> > {
> > struct intel_xe_perf_metric_set *test_set = default_test_set;
> > - int oa_exponent = max_oa_exponent_for_period_lte(2 * NSEC_PER_SEC);
> > uint64_t properties[] = {
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_SAMPLE_OA, true,
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_METRIC_SET, test_set->perf_oa_metrics_set,
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_FORMAT, __ff(test_set->perf_oa_format),
> > - DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_PERIOD_EXPONENT, oa_exponent,
> > + DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_PERIOD_EXPONENT, oa_exponent_default,
> > DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_ENGINE_INSTANCE, hwe->engine_instance,
> > };
> > struct intel_xe_oa_open_prop param = {
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-22 3:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-15 1:06 [PATCH 00/13] Some refactor, rewrite and fixes for OA tests Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 01/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Use static for global variables Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-18 17:28 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 02/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Drop unused macro Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-18 17:32 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 03/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Rename oa_exp_1_millisec to oa_exponent_default Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 2:42 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-22 3:35 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 04/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Use default exponent for some tests Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 2:43 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-22 3:37 ` Dixit, Ashutosh [this message]
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 05/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Use same render copy width and height across tests Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 2:48 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 06/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Rewrite the polling small buf test Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-24 21:35 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-25 4:26 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-25 22:51 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-27 3:45 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 07/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Simplify the buffer-fill test Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-24 21:33 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 08/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Use default buffer size for non-zero reason Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 3:10 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 09/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Test oa buffer sizes Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-18 18:34 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-18 18:38 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-18 18:44 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 0:13 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-22 1:12 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 3:14 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 10/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Rewrite enable-disable test Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-25 0:30 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-25 2:54 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-25 22:25 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 11/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Enable unprivileged-single-ctx-counters and fix it Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-25 3:53 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 12/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Fix mmio_trigger_reports testing Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 3:32 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 1:06 ` [PATCH 13/13] tests/intel/xe_oa: Set boundaries for OA exponent test Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-22 3:17 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2025-02-15 2:09 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Some refactor, rewrite and fixes for OA tests Patchwork
2025-02-15 2:23 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-18 18:32 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-16 8:05 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-02-18 18:38 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2025-02-18 18:40 ` Dixit, Ashutosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85bjuuy7hp.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--to=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.