Re: [PATCH v11 07/14] irqchip: Add RISC-V incoming MSI controller early driver

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Mon, Oct 23 2023 at 22:57, Anup Patel wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS
> +void imsic_vector_debug_show(struct seq_file *m,
> +			     struct imsic_vector *vec, int ind)
> +{
> +	unsigned int mcpu = 0, mlocal_id = 0;
> +	struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv;
> +	bool move_in_progress = false;
> +	struct imsic_vector *mvec;
> +	bool is_enabled = false;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	lpriv = per_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv, vec->cpu);
> +	if (WARN_ON(&lpriv->vectors[vec->local_id] != vec))
> +		return;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lpriv->ids_lock, flags);
> +	if (test_bit(vec->local_id, lpriv->ids_enabled_bitmap))
> +		is_enabled = true;
> +	mvec = lpriv->ids_move[vec->local_id];
> +	if (mvec) {
> +		move_in_progress = true;
> +		mcpu = mvec->cpu;
> +		mlocal_id = mvec->local_id;
> +	}
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpriv->ids_lock, flags);
> +
> +	seq_printf(m, "%*starget_cpu      : %5u\n", ind, "", vec->cpu);
> +	seq_printf(m, "%*starget_local_id : %5u\n", ind, "", vec->local_id);
> +	seq_printf(m, "%*sis_reserved     : %5u\n", ind, "",
> +		   (vec->local_id <= IMSIC_IPI_ID) ? 1 : 0);
> +	seq_printf(m, "%*sis_enabled      : %5u\n", ind, "",
> +		   (move_in_progress) ? 1 : 0);
> +	seq_printf(m, "%*sis_move_pending : %5u\n", ind, "",
> +		   (move_in_progress) ? 1 : 0);
> +	if (move_in_progress) {
> +		seq_printf(m, "%*smove_cpu        : %5u\n", ind, "", mcpu);
> +		seq_printf(m, "%*smove_local_id   : %5u\n", ind, "", mlocal_id);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +void imsic_vector_debug_show_summary(struct seq_file *m, int ind)
> +{
> +	unsigned int cpu, total_avail = 0, total_used = 0;
> +	struct imsic_global_config *global = &imsic->global;
> +	struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		lpriv = per_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv, cpu);
> +
> +		total_avail += global->nr_ids;
> +
> +		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lpriv->ids_lock, flags);
> +		total_used += bitmap_weight(lpriv->ids_used_bitmap,
> +					    global->nr_ids + 1) - 1;
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpriv->ids_lock, flags);
> +	}
> +
> +	seq_printf(m, "%*stotal : %5u\n", ind, "", total_avail);
> +	seq_printf(m, "%*sused  : %5u\n", ind, "", total_used);
> +	seq_printf(m, "%*s| CPU | tot | usd | vectors\n", ind, " ");
> +
> +	cpus_read_lock();
> +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> +		lpriv = per_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv, cpu);
> +
> +		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lpriv->ids_lock, flags);
> +		total_used = bitmap_weight(lpriv->ids_used_bitmap,
> +					   global->nr_ids + 1) - 1;
> +		seq_printf(m, "%*s %4d  %4u  %4u  %*pbl\n", ind, " ",
> +			   cpu, global->nr_ids, total_used,
> +			   global->nr_ids + 1, lpriv->ids_used_bitmap);
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpriv->ids_lock, flags);
> +	}
> +	cpus_read_unlock();

This looks very close to the matrix alocator information, just done differently.

> +static unsigned int imsic_vector_best_cpu(const struct cpumask *mask,
> +					  unsigned int order)
> +{
> +	struct imsic_global_config *global = &imsic->global;
> +	unsigned int cpu, best_cpu, free, maxfree = 0;
> +	struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	best_cpu = UINT_MAX;
> +	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
> +		if (!cpu_online(cpu))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		lpriv = per_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv, cpu);
> +		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lpriv->ids_lock, flags);
> +		free = bitmap_weight(lpriv->ids_used_bitmap,
> +				     global->nr_ids + 1);
> +		free = (global->nr_ids + 1) - free;
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpriv->ids_lock, flags);
> +		if (free < BIT(order) || free <= maxfree)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		best_cpu = cpu;
> +		maxfree = free;
> +	}
> +
> +	return best_cpu;

Looks very much like what the matrix allocator provides, right?

What's the actual reason that you can't use it?

Thanks,

        tglx

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv