From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Miche Baker-Harvey <miche@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Eric Northrup <digitaleric@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hvc_init(): Enforce one-time initialization.
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:00:31 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874nybqo0o.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111108214504.28884.61814.stgit@miche.sea.corp.google.com>
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:45:04 -0800, Miche Baker-Harvey <miche@google.com> wrote:
> hvc_init() must only be called once, and no thread should continue with hvc_alloc()
> until after initialization is complete. The original code does not enforce either
> of these requirements. A new mutex limits entry to hvc_init() to a single thread,
> and blocks all later comers until it has completed.
>
> This patch fixes multiple crash symptoms.
No, it doesn't: not now your previous double-hvc_init patch has been
reverted.
It's easy to show this is the case though: replace mutex_lock() with:
if (!mutex_trylock()) {
WARN(1, "hvc_console: mutex is stopping us!\n");
mutex_lock();
}
If you get that warning, then your mutex is doing something.
Thanks,
Rusty.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Miche Baker-Harvey <miche@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Eric Northrup <digitaleric@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] hvc_init(): Enforce one-time initialization.
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 15:00:31 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874nybqo0o.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111108214504.28884.61814.stgit@miche.sea.corp.google.com>
On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:45:04 -0800, Miche Baker-Harvey <miche@google.com> wrote:
> hvc_init() must only be called once, and no thread should continue with hvc_alloc()
> until after initialization is complete. The original code does not enforce either
> of these requirements. A new mutex limits entry to hvc_init() to a single thread,
> and blocks all later comers until it has completed.
>
> This patch fixes multiple crash symptoms.
No, it doesn't: not now your previous double-hvc_init patch has been
reverted.
It's easy to show this is the case though: replace mutex_lock() with:
if (!mutex_trylock()) {
WARN(1, "hvc_console: mutex is stopping us!\n");
mutex_lock();
}
If you get that warning, then your mutex is doing something.
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-11 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-08 21:44 [PATCH RFC v3 0/3] Support multiple VirtioConsoles Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-08 21:44 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-08 21:44 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] virtio_console: Fix locking of vtermno Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-08 21:44 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-11 4:27 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-11 4:27 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-11 4:27 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-17 19:09 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 19:09 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 19:09 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-08 21:44 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-08 21:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] hvc_init(): Enforce one-time initialization Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-08 21:45 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-08 21:45 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-09 7:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2011-11-09 7:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2011-11-09 7:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2011-11-11 4:30 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2011-11-11 4:30 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-17 18:57 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-17 18:57 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-21 5:01 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-21 5:01 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-21 5:01 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-21 22:16 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-21 22:16 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-22 0:58 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-22 0:58 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-22 0:58 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-21 22:16 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-23 10:38 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-23 10:38 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-23 10:38 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-23 12:56 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-23 12:56 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-23 12:56 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-23 13:06 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-23 13:06 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-23 13:06 ` Sasha Levin
2011-11-23 13:15 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-23 13:15 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-23 13:15 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-28 23:40 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-28 23:40 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-28 23:40 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-29 14:21 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-29 14:21 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-29 14:21 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-29 17:04 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-29 17:04 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-29 17:04 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-29 17:50 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-29 17:50 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-29 17:50 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-12-05 10:54 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-05 10:54 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-05 10:54 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-06 17:05 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-12-06 17:05 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-12-06 17:05 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-12-08 12:08 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-08 12:08 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-08 12:08 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-12 19:11 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-12-12 19:11 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-12-12 19:11 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-12-12 19:25 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-12 19:25 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-12 19:25 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-16 6:00 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-16 6:00 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-16 6:00 ` Amit Shah
2011-12-16 6:00 ` Amit Shah
2011-11-17 18:57 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-08 21:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] Use separate struct console structure for each hvc_console Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-08 21:45 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-08 21:45 ` Miche Baker-Harvey
2011-11-09 8:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2011-11-09 8:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2011-11-09 8:05 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874nybqo0o.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=digitaleric@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=miche@google.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.