From: holgerschurig@gmail.com (Holger Schurig)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:35:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452621710-15336-2-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> ("Lothar \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Wa\=C3\=9Fmann\=22's\?\= message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:01:48 +0100")
Lothar Wa?mann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> writes:
> +/ {
> + model = "Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 Module";
> + compatible = "karo,imx6dl-tx6dl", "fsl,imx6dl";
> + timestamp = __DATE__, __TIME__;
Is this needed or useful?
There's a movement that aims to do "reproducible builds" ... being
able to recompile an image and verify it against the supplied can be
helpful for security audit purposes.
> + display: display at di0 {
> + compatible = "fsl,imx-parallel-display";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_disp0_1>;
> + interface-pix-fmt = "rgb24";
> +// fsl,panel = <&lcd0_panel>;
Probably not for upstream inclusion?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW-bxm8fMRDkQLDiMYJYoSAnRvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ian Campbell
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:35:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452621710-15336-2-git-send-email-LW-bxm8fMRDkQLDiMYJYoSAnRvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org> ("Lothar \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Wa\=C3\=9Fmann\=22's\?\= message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:01:48 +0100")
Lothar Waßmann <LW-bxm8fMRDkQLDiMYJYoSAnRvVK+yQ3ZXh@public.gmane.org> writes:
> +/ {
> + model = "Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 Module";
> + compatible = "karo,imx6dl-tx6dl", "fsl,imx6dl";
> + timestamp = __DATE__, __TIME__;
Is this needed or useful?
There's a movement that aims to do "reproducible builds" ... being
able to recompile an image and verify it against the supplied can be
helpful for security audit purposes.
> + display: display@di0 {
> + compatible = "fsl,imx-parallel-display";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_disp0_1>;
> + interface-pix-fmt = "rgb24";
> +// fsl,panel = <&lcd0_panel>;
Probably not for upstream inclusion?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
To: "Lothar Waßmann" <LW@KARO-electronics.de>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:35:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452621710-15336-2-git-send-email-LW@KARO-electronics.de> ("Lothar \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Wa\=C3\=9Fmann\=22's\?\= message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2016 19:01:48 +0100")
Lothar Waßmann <LW@KARO-electronics.de> writes:
> +/ {
> + model = "Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 Module";
> + compatible = "karo,imx6dl-tx6dl", "fsl,imx6dl";
> + timestamp = __DATE__, __TIME__;
Is this needed or useful?
There's a movement that aims to do "reproducible builds" ... being
able to recompile an image and verify it against the supplied can be
helpful for security audit purposes.
> + display: display@di0 {
> + compatible = "fsl,imx-parallel-display";
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_disp0_1>;
> + interface-pix-fmt = "rgb24";
> +// fsl,panel = <&lcd0_panel>;
Probably not for upstream inclusion?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-12 18:01 [PATCH 0/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for more i.MX6 modules from Ka-Ro electronics Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-12 18:01 ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-12 18:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-12 18:01 ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-12 18:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: imx6ul: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TXUL modules Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-12 18:01 ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-12 18:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add display timing for NL12880BC20 display to Ka-Ro electronics TX6 LVDS modules Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-12 18:01 ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-12 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: imx6ul: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TXUL modules Fabio Estevam
2016-01-12 18:43 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-01-12 18:43 ` Fabio Estevam
2016-01-13 11:36 ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-13 11:36 ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-13 11:36 ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-13 7:35 ` Holger Schurig [this message]
2016-01-13 7:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: imx6: add support for Ka-Ro electronics TX6S-8034 module Holger Schurig
2016-01-13 7:35 ` Holger Schurig
2016-01-13 11:10 ` Lothar Waßmann
2016-01-13 11:10 ` Lothar Waßmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h9iigce7.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=holgerschurig@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.