From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Restore lost DPLL register write on gen2-4
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:10:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pp0i52ys.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151008081844.GS26517@intel.com>
On Thu, 08 Oct 2015, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:17:30AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:08:24PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> >
>> > We accidentally lost the initial DPLL register write in
>> > 1c4e02746147 drm/i915: Fix DVO 2x clock enable on 830M
>> >
>> > The "three times for luck" hack probably saved us from a total
>> > disaster. But anyway, bring the initial write back so that the
>> > code actually makes some sense.
>> >
>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> > Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
>> References: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/077463.html
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 ++
>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > index 147e700..f4fdff9 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > @@ -1743,6 +1743,8 @@ static void i9xx_enable_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> > I915_READ(DPLL(!crtc->pipe)) | DPLL_DVO_2X_MODE);
>>
>> Don't we also need a POSTING_READ here to make sure the two-step 2x mode
>> sequence is still followed?
>
> We don't do write combining on registers, and there are no shadow
> register type of things to consider in this case either.
>
>>
>> With that addressed Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Daniel, are you happy with the responses about posting reads, for both
patches?
BR,
Jani.
>> > }
>> >
>> > + I915_WRITE(reg, dpll);
>> > +
>> > /* Wait for the clocks to stabilize. */
>> > POSTING_READ(reg);
>> > udelay(150);
>> > --
>> > 2.4.9
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Intel-gfx mailing list
>> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Vetter
>> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
>> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Restore lost DPLL register write on gen2-4
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:10:19 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pp0i52ys.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151008081844.GS26517@intel.com>
On Thu, 08 Oct 2015, Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 10:17:30AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:08:24PM +0300, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> >
>> > We accidentally lost the initial DPLL register write in
>> > 1c4e02746147 drm/i915: Fix DVO 2x clock enable on 830M
>> >
>> > The "three times for luck" hack probably saved us from a total
>> > disaster. But anyway, bring the initial write back so that the
>> > code actually makes some sense.
>> >
>> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>> > Cc: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
>> Reported-and-tested-by: Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca>
>> References: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2015-October/077463.html
>>
>> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 ++
>> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > index 147e700..f4fdff9 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
>> > @@ -1743,6 +1743,8 @@ static void i9xx_enable_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
>> > I915_READ(DPLL(!crtc->pipe)) | DPLL_DVO_2X_MODE);
>>
>> Don't we also need a POSTING_READ here to make sure the two-step 2x mode
>> sequence is still followed?
>
> We don't do write combining on registers, and there are no shadow
> register type of things to consider in this case either.
>
>>
>> With that addressed Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Daniel, are you happy with the responses about posting reads, for both
patches?
BR,
Jani.
>> > }
>> >
>> > + I915_WRITE(reg, dpll);
>> > +
>> > /* Wait for the clocks to stabilize. */
>> > POSTING_READ(reg);
>> > udelay(150);
>> > --
>> > 2.4.9
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Intel-gfx mailing list
>> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Vetter
>> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
>> http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
> --
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel OTC
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-13 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-07 19:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Restore lost DPLL register write on gen2-4 ville.syrjala
2015-10-07 19:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Enable DPLL VGA mode before P1/P2 divider write ville.syrjala
2015-10-08 8:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-08 8:47 ` Chris Wilson
2015-10-08 8:17 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Restore lost DPLL register write on gen2-4 Daniel Vetter
2015-10-08 8:17 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-08 8:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-08 8:18 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-10-13 13:10 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2015-10-13 13:10 ` Jani Nikula
2015-10-13 13:56 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-10-13 13:56 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2015-10-13 14:07 ` Jani Nikula
2015-10-13 14:07 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pp0i52ys.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=nbowler@draconx.ca \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.