From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Dionna Amalie Glaze <dionnaglaze@google.com>,
Kevin Loughlin <kevinloughlin@google.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 00/21] x86: strict separation of startup code
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 11:54:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wmajikld.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCQ2L3L2DQX80blY@gmail.com>
Ingo!
On Wed, May 14 2025 at 08:20, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> Your failure to follow and understand this series is not an excuse for
> the flippant and condescending tone you are using in your replies ...
Can you please stop right there?
I've been observing this for a while now and to be blatantly honest,
_you_ are the one who is constantly failing to work in a team and _you_
are the one who acts like a 19'th century school master.
Your outbreaks of showing up and applying random patches fresh from the
press, your absolute refusal to slow down when asked for, is annoying as
hell to everyone working in and against the tip tree.
You can do whatever you want on your private mingo/*.git branches, but
this frenzy of shoving crap into tip has to stop once and forever.
Borislav, Dave and Peter are doing a great job in taming the influx and
reviewing the patch firehose, but there are limitations on bandwidth and
you cannot demand that everyone drops everything just because you
declare that a particular patch series is the most important thing since
the invention of sliced bread.
You are not the one setting the rules of how the tip team works together
and if you can't agree with the rest of the team, then either we all sit
together and hash it out or you step back.
Continuing this sh*tshow, which is going on for way too long now (hint:
years), is not an option at all.
Thanks,
Thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-14 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-12 19:08 [RFT PATCH v3 00/21] x86: strict separation of startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 01/21] x86/sev: Separate MSR and GHCB based snp_cpuid() via a callback Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-15 7:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 10:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-15 15:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-15 11:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-15 14:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 02/21] x86/sev: Use MSR protocol for remapping SVSM calling area Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-15 16:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 03/21] x86/sev: Use MSR protocol only for early SVSM PVALIDATE call Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 04/21] x86/sev: Run RMPADJUST on SVSM calling area page to test VMPL Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-20 9:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 05/21] x86/sev: Move GHCB page based HV communication out of startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-20 11:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-20 11:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-20 13:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 06/21] x86/sev: Avoid global variable to store virtual address of SVSM area Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 07/21] x86/sev: Move MSR save/restore out of early page state change helper Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 08/21] x86/sev: Share implementation of MSR-based page state change Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 09/21] x86/sev: Pass SVSM calling area down to early page state change API Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-13 13:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-13 13:58 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 10/21] x86/sev: Use boot SVSM CA for all startup and init code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 11/21] x86/boot: Drop redundant RMPADJUST in SEV SVSM presence check Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 12/21] x86/sev: Unify SEV-SNP hypervisor feature check Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-30 11:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-30 14:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-30 16:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-30 16:12 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-30 16:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 13/21] x86/sev: Provide PIC aliases for SEV related data objects Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 14/21] x86/boot: Provide PIC aliases for 5-level paging related constants Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 15/21] x86/sev: Move __sev_[get|put]_ghcb() into separate noinstr object Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 16/21] x86/sev: Export startup routines for later use Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 17/21] x86/boot: Create a confined code area for startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 18/21] x86/boot: Move startup code out of __head section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 19/21] x86/boot: Disallow absolute symbol references in startup code Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 20/21] x86/boot: Revert "Reject absolute references in .head.text" Ard Biesheuvel
2025-06-01 9:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-12 19:08 ` [RFT PATCH v3 21/21] x86/boot: Get rid of the .head.text section Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-12 19:17 ` [RFT PATCH v3 00/21] x86: strict separation of startup code Borislav Petkov
2025-05-13 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-13 10:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-13 11:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-13 14:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-13 15:01 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-13 16:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-13 21:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 6:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-14 7:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-15 7:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-14 6:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-05-14 8:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-14 8:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-14 9:54 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-05-14 17:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-05-14 17:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-05-14 18:53 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87wmajikld.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dionnaglaze@google.com \
--cc=kevinloughlin@google.com \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.