From: "K V P, Satyanarayana" <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Add long-spin-comp-reuse-many-preempt-threads
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 17:07:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88f543fa-22c0-46ac-a8fe-bc50fb234f4e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aOOJHMN8L0VJIh4K@lstrano-desk.jf.intel.com>
On 06-10-2025 14:47, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 05:16:19PM +0530, K V P, Satyanarayana wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 24-09-2025 02:43, Matthew Brost wrote:
>>> Add long-spin-comp-reuse-many-preempt-threads which verifies compressed
>>> memory can be used during this test. Useful to test VF migration.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> lib/xe/xe_legacy.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>> tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_legacy.c b/lib/xe/xe_legacy.c
>>> index cb53a8cfc8..74432a4b3a 100644
>>> --- a/lib/xe/xe_legacy.c
>>> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_legacy.c
>>> @@ -9,9 +9,11 @@
>>> #include "xe/xe_ioctl.h"
>>> #include "xe/xe_legacy.h"
>>> #include "xe/xe_spin.h"
>>> +#include "intel_pat.h"
>>> /* Batch buffer element count, in number of dwords(u32) */
>>> #define BATCH_DW_COUNT 16
>>> +#define COMPRESSION (0x1 << 13)
>>> #define SYSTEM (0x1 << 12)
>>> #define LONG_SPIN_REUSE_QUEUE (0x1 << 11)
>>> #define LONG_SPIN (0x1 << 8)
>>> @@ -72,6 +74,9 @@ xe_legacy_test_mode(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>>> igt_assert_lte(n_exec_queues, MAX_N_EXECQUEUES);
>>> + if (flags & COMPRESSION)
>>> + igt_require(intel_gen(intel_get_drm_devid(fd)) >= 20);
>>> +
>>> if (flags & CLOSE_FD)
>>> fd = drm_open_driver(DRIVER_XE);
>>> @@ -79,11 +84,20 @@ xe_legacy_test_mode(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>>> bo_size = sizeof(*data) * (n_execs + extra_execs);
>>> bo_size = xe_bb_size(fd, bo_size);
>>> - bo = xe_bo_create(fd, vm, bo_size,
>>> - flags & SYSTEM ?
>>> - system_memory(fd) :
>>> - vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id),
>>> - DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
>>> + if (flags & COMPRESSION) {
>>> + bo = xe_bo_create_caching(fd, vm, bo_size,
>>> + flags & SYSTEM ?
>>> + system_memory(fd) :
>>> + vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id),
>>> + DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM,
>> This limits BO creation for VRAM right. So, the compression case will not
>> work for IGPU?
>
> DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM gets squashed in
> ___xe_bo_create if placement is system:
>
> 382 /*
> 383 * In case vram_if_possible returned system_memory,
> 384 * visible VRAM cannot be requested through flags
> 385 */
> 386 if (!vram_selected(fd, placement))
> 387 create.flags &= ~DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM;
>
> So this test works on dGPU and iGPU. I've verfied this test on BMG /
> PTL.
>
> Matt
>
>> -Satya.> + DRM_XE_GEM_CPU_CACHING_WC);
>>> + } else {
>>> + bo = xe_bo_create(fd, vm, bo_size,
>>> + flags & SYSTEM ?
>>> + system_memory(fd) :
>>> + vram_if_possible(fd, eci->gt_id),
>>> + DRM_XE_GEM_CREATE_FLAG_NEEDS_VISIBLE_VRAM);
>>> + }
>>> data = xe_bo_map(fd, bo, bo_size);
>>> for (i = 0; i < n_exec_queues; i++) {
>>> @@ -94,7 +108,14 @@ xe_legacy_test_mode(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>>> sync[0].handle = syncobj_create(fd, 0);
>>> /* Binding mechanism based on use_capture_mode */
>>> - if (use_capture_mode) {
>>> + if (flags & COMPRESSION) {
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = __xe_vm_bind(fd, vm, 0, bo, 0, addr, bo_size,
>>> + DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_MAP, 0, sync, 1, 0,
>>> + intel_get_pat_idx_uc_comp(fd), 0);
>>> + igt_assert(!ret);
>>> + } else if (use_capture_mode) {
>>> __xe_vm_bind_assert(fd, vm, 0, bo, 0, addr, bo_size,
>>> DRM_XE_VM_BIND_OP_MAP, flags, sync, 1, 0, 0);
>>> } else {
>>> @@ -141,7 +162,8 @@ xe_legacy_test_mode(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>>> xe_exec(fd, &exec);
>>> - if (!i && !(flags & CAT_ERROR) && !use_capture_mode)
>>> + if (!i && !(flags & CAT_ERROR) && !use_capture_mode &&
>>> + !(flags & COMPRESSION))
>>> xe_spin_wait_started(&data[i].spin);
>>> }
>>> @@ -202,7 +224,7 @@ xe_legacy_test_mode(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>>> xe_vm_unbind_async(fd, vm, 0, 0, addr, bo_size, sync, 1);
>>> igt_assert(syncobj_wait(fd, &sync[0].handle, 1, INT64_MAX, 0, NULL));
>>> - if (!use_capture_mode && !(flags & (GT_RESET | CANCEL))) {
>>> + if (!use_capture_mode && !(flags & (GT_RESET | CANCEL | COMPRESSION))) {
>>> for (i = flags & LONG_SPIN ? n_exec_queues : 1;
>>> i < n_execs + extra_execs; i++)
>>> igt_assert_eq(data[i].data, 0xc0ffee);
>>> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c b/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
>>> index 113ceb2178..f5db1ff8ba 100644
>>> --- a/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
>>> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_exec_reset.c
>>> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ static void test_spin(int fd, struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *eci,
>>> #define GT1 (0x1 << 10)
>>> #define LONG_SPIN_REUSE_QUEUE (0x1 << 11)
>>> #define SYSTEM (0x1 << 12)
>>> +#define COMPRESSION (0x1 << 13)
>>> /**
>>> * SUBTEST: %s-cat-error
>>> @@ -702,6 +703,9 @@ static void *thread(void *data)
>>> * SUBTEST: long-spin-sys-reuse-many-preempt-threads
>>> * Description: Test long spinners with many preemptable jobs on each engine instance with a thread, use queues again spinners complete, both GTs, use system memory
>>> *
>>> + * SUBTEST: long-spin-comp-reuse-many-preempt-threads
>>> + * Description: Test long spinners with many preemptable jobs on each engine instance with a thread, use queues again spinners complete, both GTs, use compressed memory
>>> + *
>>> * SUBTEST: long-spin-reuse-many-preempt-gt0-threads
>>> * Description: Test long spinners with many preemptable jobs on each engine instance with a thread, use queues again spinners complete, primary GT
>>> *
>>> @@ -878,6 +882,10 @@ igt_main
>>> threads(fd, 2, 16, SYSTEM | LONG_SPIN | PREEMPT |
>>> LONG_SPIN_REUSE_QUEUE);
>>> + igt_subtest("long-spin-comp-reuse-many-preempt-threads")
>>> + threads(fd, 2, 16, COMPRESSION | LONG_SPIN | PREEMPT |
>>> + LONG_SPIN_REUSE_QUEUE);
>>> +
>>> igt_subtest("long-spin-reuse-many-preempt-gt0-threads")
>>> threads(fd, 2, 16, LONG_SPIN | PREEMPT | GT0 |
>>> LONG_SPIN_REUSE_QUEUE);
>>
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Satyanarayana K V P <satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-06 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 21:13 [PATCH v3 0/5] Add tests to help verify VF migration Matthew Brost
2025-09-23 21:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Add job cancel tests Matthew Brost
2025-09-30 11:21 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2025-09-23 21:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Add timeslice preempt test Matthew Brost
2025-09-30 13:10 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2025-09-23 21:13 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Long spin tests Matthew Brost
2025-09-30 13:12 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2025-09-23 21:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Add long-spin-sys-reuse-many-preempt-threads Matthew Brost
2025-09-30 13:13 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2025-09-23 21:13 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] tests/intel/xe_exec_reset: Add long-spin-comp-reuse-many-preempt-threads Matthew Brost
2025-09-30 14:29 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2025-10-01 2:24 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-01 17:41 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2025-09-30 17:35 ` Kamil Konieczny
2025-10-01 2:18 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-01 11:55 ` Kamil Konieczny
2025-10-01 11:46 ` K V P, Satyanarayana
2025-10-06 9:17 ` Matthew Brost
2025-10-06 11:37 ` K V P, Satyanarayana [this message]
2025-09-24 1:48 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Add tests to help verify VF migration (rev3) Patchwork
2025-09-24 2:05 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-24 6:26 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
2025-09-24 16:44 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88f543fa-22c0-46ac-a8fe-bc50fb234f4e@intel.com \
--to=satyanarayana.k.v.p@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.