From: Chinmay Rath <rathc@linux.ibm.com>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Nikhil Kumar Singh <nikhilks@linux.ibm.com>,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, npiggin@gmail.com,
harshpb@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/28] target/ppc: move various conditional branch insns to decodetree
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:49:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8aa63fba-4b12-4c67-9c1b-d3dccf3b4b0f@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aldMCp8X6_lpE97M@li-dc0c254c-257c-11b2-a85c-98b6c1322444.ibm.com>
On 7/15/26 14:29, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2026 at 10:50:39PM +0530, Nikhil Kumar Singh wrote:
>> On 20/05/26 21:37, Chinmay Rath wrote:
>>> From: Ojaswin Mujoo<ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> Convert the following instrunctions to decodetree specification:
>> The word should be spelled `instructions` and not `instrunctions`. Please
>> fix this in the
>> commit message.
> Hi Nikhil, thanks for the review. I'll make the change.
>>> bc
>>> bca
>>> bcl
>>> bcla
>>>
>>> bclr
>>> bclrl
>>>
>>> bcctr
>>> bcctrl
>>>
>>> bctar
>>> bctarl
>>>
>>> The branch was tested by comparing the qemu -D log -d op,in_asm output for
>>> each instruction and also for the various combinations of branch option
>>> (BO) bits for the conditional branch instructions. Additionally, gdb
>>> was used to confirm the LR and other register's behavior is consistent
>>> to legacy behavior.
>>>
>>> Further, the changes also pass a boot test into Fedora distro.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo<ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chinmay Rath<rathc@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>> target/ppc/insn32.decode | 13 ++
>>> target/ppc/translate.c | 148 -----------------------
>>> target/ppc/translate/branch-impl.c.inc | 157 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/ppc/insn32.decode b/target/ppc/insn32.decode
>>> index b98fe01a84..34b36cbef6 100644
>>> --- a/target/ppc/insn32.decode
>>> +++ b/target/ppc/insn32.decode
>>> @@ -1485,6 +1485,19 @@ CLRBHRB 011111 ----- ----- ----- 0110101110 -
>>> B 010010 ........................ . . @I_b
>>> +%bd 2:14 !function=times_4
>>> +&bcond bo:uint32_t bi bd aa:bool lk:bool
>>> +@B_bcond ...... bo:5 bi:5 .............. aa:1 lk:1 &bcond bd=%bd
>>> +
>>> +BC 010000 ..... ..... .............. . . @B_bcond
>>> +
>>> +&bclr bo bi bh lk:bool
>>> +@XL_bclr ...... bo:5 bi:5 --- bh:2 .......... lk:1 &bclr
>>> +
>>> +BCLR 010011 ..... ..... ---.. 0000010000 . @XL_bclr
>>> +BCCTR 010011 ..... ..... ---.. 1000010000 . @XL_bclr
>>> +BCTAR 010011 ..... ..... ---.. 1000110000 . @XL_bclr
>>> +
>>> ## Misc POWER instructions
>>> ATTN 000000 00000 00000 00000 0100000000 0
>>> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c
>>> index 37a164951f..22125c30a5 100644
>>> --- a/target/ppc/translate.c
>>> +++ b/target/ppc/translate.c
>>> @@ -3089,150 +3089,6 @@ static inline void gen_setlr(DisasContext *ctx, target_ulong nip)
>>> tcg_gen_movi_tl(cpu_lr, nip);
>>> }
>>> -#define BCOND_IM 0
>>> -#define BCOND_LR 1
>>> -#define BCOND_CTR 2
>>> -#define BCOND_TAR 3
>>> -
>>> -static void gen_bcond(DisasContext *ctx, int type)
>>> -{
>>> - uint32_t bo = BO(ctx->opcode);
>>> - TCGLabel *l1;
>>> - TCGv target;
>>> - target_long bhrb_type = BHRB_TYPE_OTHER;
>>> -
>>> - if (type == BCOND_LR || type == BCOND_CTR || type == BCOND_TAR) {
>>> - target = tcg_temp_new();
>>> - if (type == BCOND_CTR) {
>>> - tcg_gen_mov_tl(target, cpu_ctr);
>>> - } else if (type == BCOND_TAR) {
>>> - gen_load_spr(target, SPR_TAR);
>>> - } else {
>>> - tcg_gen_mov_tl(target, cpu_lr);
>>> - }
>>> - if (!LK(ctx->opcode)) {
>>> - bhrb_type |= BHRB_TYPE_INDIRECT;
>>> - }
>>> - bhrb_type |= BHRB_TYPE_XL_FORM;
>>> - } else {
>>> - target = NULL;
>>> - }
>>> - if (LK(ctx->opcode)) {
>>> - gen_setlr(ctx, ctx->base.pc_next);
>>> - bhrb_type |= BHRB_TYPE_CALL;
>>> - }
>>> - l1 = gen_new_label();
>>> - if ((bo & 0x4) == 0) {
>>> - /* Decrement and test CTR */
>>> - TCGv temp = tcg_temp_new();
>>> -
>>> - if (type == BCOND_CTR) {
>>> - /*
>>> - * All ISAs up to v3 describe this form of bcctr as invalid but
>>> - * some processors, ie. 64-bit server processors compliant with
>>> - * arch 2.x, do implement a "test and decrement" logic instead,
>>> - * as described in their respective UMs. This logic involves CTR
>>> - * to act as both the branch target and a counter, which makes
>>> - * it basically useless and thus never used in real code.
>>> - *
>>> - * This form was hence chosen to trigger extra micro-architectural
>>> - * side-effect on real HW needed for the Spectre v2 workaround.
>>> - * It is up to guests that implement such workaround, ie. linux, to
>>> - * use this form in a way it just triggers the side-effect without
>>> - * doing anything else harmful.
>>> - */
>>> - if (unlikely(!is_book3s_arch2x(ctx))) {
>>> - gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_INVAL);
>>> - return;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
>>> - tcg_gen_ext32u_tl(temp, cpu_ctr);
>>> - } else {
>>> - tcg_gen_mov_tl(temp, cpu_ctr);
>>> - }
>>> - if (bo & 0x2) {
>>> - tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_NE, temp, 0, l1);
>>> - } else {
>>> - tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_EQ, temp, 0, l1);
>>> - }
>>> - tcg_gen_subi_tl(cpu_ctr, cpu_ctr, 1);
>>> - } else {
>>> - tcg_gen_subi_tl(cpu_ctr, cpu_ctr, 1);
>>> - if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
>>> - tcg_gen_ext32u_tl(temp, cpu_ctr);
>>> - } else {
>>> - tcg_gen_mov_tl(temp, cpu_ctr);
>>> - }
>>> - if (bo & 0x2) {
>>> - tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_NE, temp, 0, l1);
>>> - } else {
>>> - tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_EQ, temp, 0, l1);
>>> - }
>>> - }
>>> - bhrb_type |= BHRB_TYPE_COND;
>>> - }
>>> - if ((bo & 0x10) == 0) {
>>> - /* Test CR */
>>> - uint32_t bi = BI(ctx->opcode);
>>> - uint32_t mask = 0x08 >> (bi & 0x03);
>>> - TCGv_i32 temp = tcg_temp_new_i32();
>>> -
>>> - if (bo & 0x8) {
>>> - tcg_gen_andi_i32(temp, cpu_crf[bi >> 2], mask);
>>> - tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, temp, 0, l1);
>>> - } else {
>>> - tcg_gen_andi_i32(temp, cpu_crf[bi >> 2], mask);
>>> - tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_NE, temp, 0, l1);
>>> - }
>>> - bhrb_type |= BHRB_TYPE_COND;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - gen_update_branch_history(ctx, ctx->cia, target, bhrb_type);
>>> -
>>> - if (type == BCOND_IM) {
>>> - target_ulong li = (target_long)((int16_t)(BD(ctx->opcode)));
>>> - if (likely(AA(ctx->opcode) == 0)) {
>>> - gen_goto_tb(ctx, 0, ctx->cia + li);
>>> - } else {
>>> - gen_goto_tb(ctx, 0, li);
>>> - }
>>> - } else {
>>> - if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
>>> - tcg_gen_andi_tl(cpu_nip, target, (uint32_t)~3);
>>> - } else {
>>> - tcg_gen_andi_tl(cpu_nip, target, ~3);
>>> - }
>>> - gen_lookup_and_goto_ptr(ctx);
>>> - }
>>> - if ((bo & 0x14) != 0x14) {
>>> - /* fallthrough case */
>>> - gen_set_label(l1);
>>> - gen_goto_tb(ctx, 1, ctx->base.pc_next);
>>> - }
>>> - ctx->base.is_jmp = DISAS_NORETURN;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static void gen_bc(DisasContext *ctx)
>>> -{
>>> - gen_bcond(ctx, BCOND_IM);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static void gen_bcctr(DisasContext *ctx)
>>> -{
>>> - gen_bcond(ctx, BCOND_CTR);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static void gen_bclr(DisasContext *ctx)
>>> -{
>>> - gen_bcond(ctx, BCOND_LR);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -static void gen_bctar(DisasContext *ctx)
>>> -{
>>> - gen_bcond(ctx, BCOND_TAR);
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> /*** Condition register logical ***/
>>> #define GEN_CRLOGIC(name, tcg_op, opc) \
>>> static void glue(gen_, name)(DisasContext *ctx) \
>>> @@ -5367,10 +5223,6 @@ GEN_HANDLER(stswx, 0x1F, 0x15, 0x14, 0x00000001, PPC_STRING),
>>> /* ISA v3.0 changed the extended opcode from 62 to 30 */
>>> GEN_HANDLER(wait, 0x1F, 0x1E, 0x01, 0x039FF801, PPC_WAIT),
>>> GEN_HANDLER_E(wait, 0x1F, 0x1E, 0x00, 0x039CF801, PPC_NONE, PPC2_ISA300),
>>> -GEN_HANDLER(bc, 0x10, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00000000, PPC_FLOW),
>>> -GEN_HANDLER(bcctr, 0x13, 0x10, 0x10, 0x00000000, PPC_FLOW),
>>> -GEN_HANDLER(bclr, 0x13, 0x10, 0x00, 0x00000000, PPC_FLOW),
>>> -GEN_HANDLER_E(bctar, 0x13, 0x10, 0x11, 0x0000E000, PPC_NONE, PPC2_BCTAR_ISA207),
>>> GEN_HANDLER(rfi, 0x13, 0x12, 0x01, 0x03FF8001, PPC_FLOW),
>>> #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
>>> GEN_HANDLER(rfid, 0x13, 0x12, 0x00, 0x03FF8001, PPC_64B),
>>> diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/branch-impl.c.inc b/target/ppc/translate/branch-impl.c.inc
>>> index 745f71afd1..44ed40422e 100644
>>> --- a/target/ppc/translate/branch-impl.c.inc
>>> +++ b/target/ppc/translate/branch-impl.c.inc
>>> @@ -55,3 +55,160 @@ static bool trans_B(DisasContext *ctx, arg_I_b *a)
>>> return true;
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +#define BCOND_IM 0
>>> +#define BCOND_LR 1
>>> +#define BCOND_CTR 2
>>> +#define BCOND_TAR 3
>>> +
>>> +static bool bcond_helper(DisasContext *ctx, int type, uint32_t bo, int bi,
>>> + int bd, int bh, bool aa, bool lk)
>>> +{
>>> + TCGLabel *l1;
>>> + TCGv target;
>>> + target_long bhrb_type = BHRB_TYPE_OTHER;
>>> +
>>> + if (type == BCOND_IM && bh != -1) {
>>> + /* BCOND_IM should never use bh */
>>> + return false;
>>> + } else if (type != BCOND_IM && (bd != -1 || aa != 0)) {
>>> + /* Other BCOND types should never use bd or aa */
>>> + return false;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (type == BCOND_LR || type == BCOND_CTR || type == BCOND_TAR) {
>>> + target = tcg_temp_new();
>>> + if (type == BCOND_CTR) {
>>> + tcg_gen_mov_tl(target, cpu_ctr);
>>> + } else if (type == BCOND_TAR) {
>>> + gen_load_spr(target, SPR_TAR);
>>> + } else {
>>> + tcg_gen_mov_tl(target, cpu_lr);
>>> + }
>>> + if (!lk) {
>>> + bhrb_type |= BHRB_TYPE_INDIRECT;
>>> + }
>>> + bhrb_type |= BHRB_TYPE_XL_FORM;
>>> + } else {
>>> + target = NULL;
>>> + }
>>> + if (lk) {
>>> + gen_setlr(ctx, ctx->base.pc_next);
>>> + bhrb_type |= BHRB_TYPE_CALL;
>>> + }
>>> + l1 = gen_new_label();
>>> + if ((bo & 0x4) == 0) {
>>> + /* Decrement and test CTR */
>>> + TCGv temp = tcg_temp_new();
>>> +
>>> + if (type == BCOND_CTR) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * All ISAs up to v3 describe this form of bcctr as invalid but
>>> + * some processors, ie. 64-bit server processors compliant with
>>> + * arch 2.x, do implement a "test and decrement" logic instead,
>>> + * as described in their respective UMs. This logic involves CTR
>>> + * to act as both the branch target and a counter, which makes
>>> + * it basically useless and thus never used in real code.
>>> + *
>>> + * This form was hence chosen to trigger extra micro-architectural
>>> + * side-effect on real HW needed for the Spectre v2 workaround.
>>> + * It is up to guests that implement such workaround, ie. linux, to
>>> + * use this form in a way it just triggers the side-effect without
>>> + * doing anything else harmful.
>>> + */
>>> + if (unlikely(!is_book3s_arch2x(ctx))) {
>>> + gen_inval_exception(ctx, POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_INVAL);
>>> + return true;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
>>> + tcg_gen_ext32u_tl(temp, cpu_ctr);
>>> + } else {
>>> + tcg_gen_mov_tl(temp, cpu_ctr);
>>> + }
>>> + if (bo & 0x2) {
>>> + tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_NE, temp, 0, l1);
>>> + } else {
>>> + tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_EQ, temp, 0, l1);
>>> + }
>>> + tcg_gen_subi_tl(cpu_ctr, cpu_ctr, 1);
>>> + } else {
>>> + tcg_gen_subi_tl(cpu_ctr, cpu_ctr, 1);
>>> + if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
>>> + tcg_gen_ext32u_tl(temp, cpu_ctr);
>>> + } else {
>>> + tcg_gen_mov_tl(temp, cpu_ctr);
>>> + }
>>> + if (bo & 0x2) {
>>> + tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_NE, temp, 0, l1);
>>> + } else {
>>> + tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_EQ, temp, 0, l1);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + bhrb_type |= BHRB_TYPE_COND;
>>> + }
>>> + if ((bo & 0x10) == 0) {
>>> + /* Test CR */
>>> + uint32_t mask = 0x08 >> (bi & 0x03);
>>> + TCGv_i32 temp = tcg_temp_new_i32();
>>> +
>>> + if (bo & 0x8) {
>>> + tcg_gen_andi_i32(temp, cpu_crf[bi >> 2], mask);
>>> + tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_EQ, temp, 0, l1);
>>> + } else {
>>> + tcg_gen_andi_i32(temp, cpu_crf[bi >> 2], mask);
>>> + tcg_gen_brcondi_i32(TCG_COND_NE, temp, 0, l1);
>>> + }
>>> + bhrb_type |= BHRB_TYPE_COND;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + gen_update_branch_history(ctx, ctx->cia, target, bhrb_type);
>>> +
>>> + if (type == BCOND_IM) {
>>> + target_ulong li = (target_long)((int16_t)(bd));
>>> + if (likely(aa == 0)) {
>>> + gen_goto_tb(ctx, 0, ctx->cia + li);
>>> + } else {
>>> + gen_goto_tb(ctx, 0, li);
>>> + }
>>> + } else {
>>> + if (NARROW_MODE(ctx)) {
>>> + tcg_gen_andi_tl(cpu_nip, target, (uint32_t)~3);
>>> + } else {
>>> + tcg_gen_andi_tl(cpu_nip, target, ~3);
>>> + }
>>> + gen_lookup_and_goto_ptr(ctx);
>>> + }
>>> + if ((bo & 0x14) != 0x14) {
>>> + /* fallthrough case */
>>> + gen_set_label(l1);
>>> + gen_goto_tb(ctx, 1, ctx->base.pc_next);
>>> + }
>>> + ctx->base.is_jmp = DISAS_NORETURN;
>>> +
>>> + return true;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static bool trans_BC(DisasContext *ctx, arg_bcond *a)
>>> +{
>>> + /*
>>> + * bh is not used for bc variants hence we pass -1
>>> + */
>>> + return bcond_helper(ctx, BCOND_IM, a->bo, a->bi, a->bd, -1, a->aa, a->lk);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * This helper is shared by bclr, bcctr and bctar.
>>> + */
>>> +static bool bclr_helper(DisasContext *ctx, arg_bclr *a, int type)
>>> +{
>>> + /*
>>> + * bd and aa is not used for bc variants hence we pass -1 and 0 respectively
>>> + */
>>> + return bcond_helper(ctx, type, a->bo, a->bi, -1, a->bh, 0, a->lk);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +TRANS(BCLR, bclr_helper, BCOND_LR)
>>> +TRANS(BCCTR, bclr_helper, BCOND_CTR)
>>> +TRANS(BCTAR, bclr_helper, BCOND_TAR)
>>> +
>> The patch looks mostly fine, but I noticed one small issue regarding the
>> bctar instruction.
>>
>> Actually, in the legacy implementation, bctar was properly guarded by the
>> ISA 2.07 feature flag like this:
>> GEN_HANDLER_E(bctar, 0x13, 0x10, 0x11, 0x0000E000, PPC_NONE,
>> PPC2_BCTAR_ISA207)
>>
>> But in the new decodetree implementation, it is getting mapped directly
>> using the standard macro
>> TRANS(BCTAR, bclr_helper, BCOND_TAR)
> Yes you are right, I missed this. Thanks for pointing it out.
>
>> Since the TRANS macro doesn't apply any secondary instruction flags (and
>> even bclr_helper / bcond_helper are not checking for it),
>> this check is being missed out.
Hi Nikhil,
Thanks for catching this !
>>
>> It could be better if you can just write a dedicated translation handler for
>> the same to enforce the BCTAR_ISA207 check.
>> I guess Chinmay can tell better on this.
> I think we can just do the following and it should be good enough:
>
> -TRANS(BCTAR, bclr_helper, BCOND_TAR)
> +TRANS_FLAGS2(BCTAR_ISA207, BCTAR, bclr_helper, BCOND_TAR)
>
> If this looks okay, I can send a v2.
Hi Ojas,
Since it is just a single line change, I will take care of it while
posting v2 series.
Regards,
Chinmay
>
> Regards,
> ojaswin
>
>> Thanks
>> ~ Nikhil
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 13:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 16:07 [RFC PATCH 00/28] target/ppc: Moving instructions to decodetree specification Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 01/28] target/ppc: Migrate extswsli to decodetree Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 02/28] target/ppc: Migrate atomic loads " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-06 8:45 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 03/28] target/ppc: Convert cache instructions " Chinmay Rath
2026-06-01 16:06 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-06-30 14:42 ` [RFC PATCH v2] " Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-06-30 15:17 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-07-08 12:11 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 04/28] target/ppc: Move vector merge " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:46 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 05/28] target/ppc: Move vector pack " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:47 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 06/28] target/ppc: Move st{b, h, w, d, q}cx " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:49 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 07/28] target/ppc: convert slw, srw instruction via decode spec Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 08/28] target/ppc: convert sraw[i] " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 09/28] target/ppc : Convert mcrf to decode tree Chinmay Rath
2026-06-12 8:38 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 10/28] target/ppc: Move fixed-point Shift insns to decodetree Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 11/28] target/ppc: Move fixed-point byte-reversal store " Chinmay Rath
2026-06-12 15:16 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-07-08 8:41 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-07-06 16:21 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-07-08 8:42 ` Amit Machhiwal
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 12/28] target/ppc: Move GPR atomic load/store instructions " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:55 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 13/28] target/ppc: Move isync instruction " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:57 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 14/28] target/ppc: Convert b{a, l, la} to decode tree Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 4:58 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 15/28] target/ppc: move various conditional branch insns to decodetree Chinmay Rath
2026-07-06 17:20 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-07-15 8:59 ` Ojaswin Mujoo
2026-07-20 13:19 ` Chinmay Rath [this message]
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 16/28] target/ppc: Fix TRANS* macro variadic arguments handling Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 17/28] target/ppc: Move wait instruction to decodetree Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 18/28] target/ppc: Move sleep & friends " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-06 17:48 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-07-07 5:09 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 19/28] target/ppc: Refactor sleep and its variants to use a common helper Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 20/28] target/ppc: Move Condition Register access instructions to decodetree Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 21/28] target/ppc: Move Condition Register logical " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 22/28] target/ppc: Move Fixed-Point Load/Store String " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-06 8:54 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-07-06 14:01 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-07-06 18:09 ` Nikhil Kumar Singh
2026-07-07 10:36 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-07-08 7:41 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-07-08 8:46 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 23/28] target/ppc: Move VMX integer arithmetic and BCD " Chinmay Rath
2026-07-06 15:22 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-07-07 10:41 ` Shivang Upadhyay
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 24/28] target/ppc: Move rlwimi, rlwinm " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 25/28] target/ppc: Move lmw, stmw " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 26/28] target/ppc: Move mfmsr, mtmsr[d] " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 27/28] target/ppc: Move byte-reverse " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-20 16:07 ` [RFC PATCH 28/28] target/ppc: Move system call and rfi " Chinmay Rath
2026-05-22 8:29 ` [RFC PATCH 00/28] target/ppc: Moving instructions to decodetree specification Vishal Chourasia
2026-05-28 10:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2] target/ppc: Move system call and rfi instructions to decodetree Vishal Chourasia
2026-07-06 10:14 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-07-13 22:01 ` Vishal Chourasia
2026-07-13 22:23 ` [RFC PATCH v3] " Vishal Chourasia
2026-07-20 13:25 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-05-28 11:08 ` [RFC PATCH 00/28] target/ppc: Moving instructions to decodetree specification Vishal Chourasia
2026-06-03 11:39 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-06-03 14:10 ` Miles Glenn
2026-06-04 10:29 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-06-11 19:18 ` Miles Glenn
2026-06-30 5:42 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-07-08 11:30 ` Chinmay Rath
2026-06-03 14:30 ` Richard Henderson
2026-06-04 10:27 ` Chinmay Rath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8aa63fba-4b12-4c67-9c1b-d3dccf3b4b0f@linux.ibm.com \
--to=rathc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nikhilks@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.