* XENPF_ numbering?
@ 2007-07-27 13:17 John Levon
2007-07-27 13:53 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: John Levon @ 2007-07-27 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
I'm sure it's something obvious, but why are there big gaps in XENPF_*
numbering?
thanks
john
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: XENPF_ numbering?
2007-07-27 13:17 XENPF_ numbering? John Levon
@ 2007-07-27 13:53 ` Keir Fraser
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Keir Fraser @ 2007-07-27 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Levon, xen-devel
The old dom0_op() API maps onto the platform_op, so any platform_ops that
were previously dom0_ops had to keep their old dom0_op-era numbers.
-- Keir
On 27/7/07 14:17, "John Levon" <levon@movementarian.org> wrote:
>
> I'm sure it's something obvious, but why are there big gaps in XENPF_*
> numbering?
>
> thanks
> john
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-27 13:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-27 13:17 XENPF_ numbering? John Levon
2007-07-27 13:53 ` Keir Fraser
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.