* XENPF_ numbering? @ 2007-07-27 13:17 John Levon 2007-07-27 13:53 ` Keir Fraser 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: John Levon @ 2007-07-27 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xen-devel I'm sure it's something obvious, but why are there big gaps in XENPF_* numbering? thanks john ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: XENPF_ numbering? 2007-07-27 13:17 XENPF_ numbering? John Levon @ 2007-07-27 13:53 ` Keir Fraser 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Keir Fraser @ 2007-07-27 13:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John Levon, xen-devel The old dom0_op() API maps onto the platform_op, so any platform_ops that were previously dom0_ops had to keep their old dom0_op-era numbers. -- Keir On 27/7/07 14:17, "John Levon" <levon@movementarian.org> wrote: > > I'm sure it's something obvious, but why are there big gaps in XENPF_* > numbering? > > thanks > john > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-27 13:53 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-07-27 13:17 XENPF_ numbering? John Levon 2007-07-27 13:53 ` Keir Fraser
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.