All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: krisman@collabora.com, pvorel@suse.cz,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	kernel@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH 3/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate incoming FID in FAN_FS_ERROR
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:19:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSOEOj7xUpADB73f@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823093524.GB21467@quack2.suse.cz>

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:35:24AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 21-08-21 07:58:07, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:21:19PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > > No problem. That's what review is for ;-)
> > > 
> > > > BTW, unless anyone is specifically interested I don't think there
> > > > is a reason to re post the test patches before the submission request.
> > > > Certainly not for the small fixes that I requested.
> > > 
> > > > I do request that you post a link to a branch with the fixed test
> > > > so that we can experiment with the kernel patches.
> > > 
> > > > I've also CC'ed Matthew who may want to help with review of the test
> > > > and man page that you posted in the cover letter [1].
> > > 
> > > @Amir Thanks a lot for your review, agree with all you mentioned.
> > > 
> > > @Gabriel Thanks for your contribution. I'd also consider squashing some of the
> > > commits.
> > 
> > Is the FAN_FS_ERROR feature to be included within the 5.15 release? If so,
> > I may need to do some shuffling around as these LTP tests collide with the
> > ones I author for the FAN_REPORT_PIDFD series.
> 
> No, I don't think FAN_FS_ERROR is quite ready for the coming merge window.
> So you should be fine.

Alrighty, thanks for letting me know Jan.

/M

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>
To: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: [LTP] [PATCH 3/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate incoming FID in FAN_FS_ERROR
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 21:19:22 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YSOEOj7xUpADB73f@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210823093524.GB21467@quack2.suse.cz>

On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 11:35:24AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Sat 21-08-21 07:58:07, Matthew Bobrowski wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 12:21:19PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > > No problem. That's what review is for ;-)
> > > 
> > > > BTW, unless anyone is specifically interested I don't think there
> > > > is a reason to re post the test patches before the submission request.
> > > > Certainly not for the small fixes that I requested.
> > > 
> > > > I do request that you post a link to a branch with the fixed test
> > > > so that we can experiment with the kernel patches.
> > > 
> > > > I've also CC'ed Matthew who may want to help with review of the test
> > > > and man page that you posted in the cover letter [1].
> > > 
> > > @Amir Thanks a lot for your review, agree with all you mentioned.
> > > 
> > > @Gabriel Thanks for your contribution. I'd also consider squashing some of the
> > > commits.
> > 
> > Is the FAN_FS_ERROR feature to be included within the 5.15 release? If so,
> > I may need to do some shuffling around as these LTP tests collide with the
> > ones I author for the FAN_REPORT_PIDFD series.
> 
> No, I don't think FAN_FS_ERROR is quite ready for the coming merge window.
> So you should be fine.

Alrighty, thanks for letting me know Jan.

/M

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-23 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-02 21:46 [PATCH 0/7] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Introduce helpers for FAN_FS_ERROR test Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46   ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-03  8:30   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-03  8:30     ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 2/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate the generic error info Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46   ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-03  8:42   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-03  8:42     ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Validate incoming FID in FAN_FS_ERROR Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46   ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-03  8:56   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-03  8:56     ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2021-08-04  4:54     ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-04  4:54       ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-04  5:39       ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-04  5:39         ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2021-08-04  7:40         ` Matthew Bobrowski
2021-08-04  7:40           ` [LTP] " Matthew Bobrowski
2021-08-20 10:21         ` Petr Vorel
2021-08-20 10:21           ` Petr Vorel
2021-08-20 21:58           ` Matthew Bobrowski
2021-08-20 21:58             ` Matthew Bobrowski
2021-08-23  9:35             ` Jan Kara
2021-08-23  9:35               ` Jan Kara
2021-08-23 11:19               ` Matthew Bobrowski [this message]
2021-08-23 11:19                 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2021-08-23 14:34             ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-23 14:34               ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 4/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Watch event after filesystem abort Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46   ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 5/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Support submission of debugfs commands Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46   ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 6/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Test file event with broken inode Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46   ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-03  9:04   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-03  9:04     ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2021-08-03  9:08   ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-03  9:08     ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2021-08-04  4:52     ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-04  4:52       ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-04  5:27       ` Amir Goldstein
2021-08-04  5:27         ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein
2021-08-05 21:50         ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-05 21:50           ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46 ` [PATCH 7/7] syscalls/fanotify20: Test capture of multiple errors Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
2021-08-02 21:46   ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YSOEOj7xUpADB73f@google.com \
    --to=repnop@google.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=khazhy@google.com \
    --cc=krisman@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.