From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>
Cc: cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
"Andrew Morton"
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
"Johannes Weiner"
<hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
"Vladimir Davydov"
<vdavydov.dev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"Waiman Long" <longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/memcg: Add a local_lock_t for IRQ and TASK object.
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:53:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfKHxKda7bGJmrLJ@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfFmxH1IXeegNOa9-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
On 2022-01-26 16:20:36 [+0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
> I do not see any obvious problem with this patch. The code is ugly as
> hell, though, but a large part of that is because of the weird locking
> scheme we already have. I've had a look at 559271146efc ("mm/memcg:
> optimize user context object stock access") and while I agree that it
> makes sense to optimize for user context I do not really see any numbers
> justifying the awkward locking scheme. Is this complexity really worth
> it?
From https://https://lkml.kernel.org/r/.kernel.org/all/YdX+INO9gQje6d0S-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org/:
| Sandy Bridge Haswell Skylake AMD-A8 7100 Zen2 ARM64
|PREEMPT 5,123,896,822 5,215,055,226 5,077,611,590 6,012,287,874 6,234,674,489 20,000,000,100
|IRQ 7,494,119,638 6,810,367,629 10,620,130,377 4,178,546,086 4,898,076,012 13,538,461,925
basically if PREEMPT < IRQ then preempt_disable() + enable() was cheaper
than local_irq_save() + restore().
| Sandy Bridge
| SERVER OPT SERVER NO-OPT PREEMPT OPT PREEMPT NO-OPT
| ALLOC/FREE 8,519,295,176 9,051,200,652 10,627,431,395 11,198,189,843
| SD 5,309,768 29,253,976 129,102,317 40,681,909
| ALLOC/FREE BH 9,996,704,330 8,927,026,031 11,680,149,900 11,139,356,465
| SD 38,237,534 72,913,120 23,626,932 116,413,331
OPT is code as-is while "NO-OPT" is with the following patch which
disables the optimisation (so it should be a revert of the optimisation
commit).
ALLOC/FREE is kfree(kmalloc()).
ALLOC/FREE BH is the same but in_interrupt() reported true.
The numbers are are time needed in ns for 100,000,000 iterations of the
free+alloc. SD is standard deviation.
I also let the test run on a Zen2 box:
| SERVER OPT SERVER NO-OPT PREEMPT OPT PREEMPT NO-OPT
| ALLOC/FREE 8,126,735,313 8,751,307,383 9,822,927,142 10,045,105,425
| SD 100,806,471 87,234,047 55,170,179 25,832,386
| ALLOC/FREE BH 9,197,455,885 8,394,337,053 10,671,227,095 9,904,954,934
| SD 155,223,919 57,800,997 47,529,496 105,260,566
Is this what you asked for?
Sebastian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Vladimir Davydov" <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
"Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mm/memcg: Add a local_lock_t for IRQ and TASK object.
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 12:53:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfKHxKda7bGJmrLJ@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YfFmxH1IXeegNOa9@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 2022-01-26 16:20:36 [+0100], Michal Hocko wrote:
> I do not see any obvious problem with this patch. The code is ugly as
> hell, though, but a large part of that is because of the weird locking
> scheme we already have. I've had a look at 559271146efc ("mm/memcg:
> optimize user context object stock access") and while I agree that it
> makes sense to optimize for user context I do not really see any numbers
> justifying the awkward locking scheme. Is this complexity really worth
> it?
From https://https://lkml.kernel.org/r/.kernel.org/all/YdX+INO9gQje6d0S@linutronix.de/:
| Sandy Bridge Haswell Skylake AMD-A8 7100 Zen2 ARM64
|PREEMPT 5,123,896,822 5,215,055,226 5,077,611,590 6,012,287,874 6,234,674,489 20,000,000,100
|IRQ 7,494,119,638 6,810,367,629 10,620,130,377 4,178,546,086 4,898,076,012 13,538,461,925
basically if PREEMPT < IRQ then preempt_disable() + enable() was cheaper
than local_irq_save() + restore().
| Sandy Bridge
| SERVER OPT SERVER NO-OPT PREEMPT OPT PREEMPT NO-OPT
| ALLOC/FREE 8,519,295,176 9,051,200,652 10,627,431,395 11,198,189,843
| SD 5,309,768 29,253,976 129,102,317 40,681,909
| ALLOC/FREE BH 9,996,704,330 8,927,026,031 11,680,149,900 11,139,356,465
| SD 38,237,534 72,913,120 23,626,932 116,413,331
OPT is code as-is while "NO-OPT" is with the following patch which
disables the optimisation (so it should be a revert of the optimisation
commit).
ALLOC/FREE is kfree(kmalloc()).
ALLOC/FREE BH is the same but in_interrupt() reported true.
The numbers are are time needed in ns for 100,000,000 iterations of the
free+alloc. SD is standard deviation.
I also let the test run on a Zen2 box:
| SERVER OPT SERVER NO-OPT PREEMPT OPT PREEMPT NO-OPT
| ALLOC/FREE 8,126,735,313 8,751,307,383 9,822,927,142 10,045,105,425
| SD 100,806,471 87,234,047 55,170,179 25,832,386
| ALLOC/FREE BH 9,197,455,885 8,394,337,053 10,671,227,095 9,904,954,934
| SD 155,223,919 57,800,997 47,529,496 105,260,566
Is this what you asked for?
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-27 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-25 16:43 [PATCH 0/4] mm/memcg: Address PREEMPT_RT problems instead of disabling it Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-25 16:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <20220125164337.2071854-1-bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-01-25 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/memcg: Disable threshold event handlers on PREEMPT_RT Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-25 16:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <20220125164337.2071854-2-bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-01-26 14:40 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-26 14:40 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <YfFddqkAhd1YKqX9-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2022-01-26 14:45 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-26 14:45 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <YfFegDwQSm9v2Qcu-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-01-26 15:04 ` Michal Koutný
2022-01-26 15:04 ` Michal Koutný
[not found] ` <20220126150455.GC2516-9OudH3eul5jcvrawFnH+a6VXKuFTiq87@public.gmane.org>
2022-01-27 13:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-27 13:36 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-26 15:21 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-26 15:21 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-25 16:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/memcg: Protect per-CPU counter by disabling preemption on PREEMPT_RT where needed Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-25 16:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <20220125164337.2071854-3-bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-01-26 10:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-01-26 10:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
[not found] ` <86eeed07-b7dc-b387-ea4d-1a4a41334fe3-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-01-26 11:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-26 11:24 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-26 14:56 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-26 14:56 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-25 16:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/memcg: Add a local_lock_t for IRQ and TASK object Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-25 16:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <20220125164337.2071854-4-bigeasy-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-01-26 15:20 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-26 15:20 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <YfFmxH1IXeegNOa9-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2022-01-27 11:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2022-01-27 11:53 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <YfKHxKda7bGJmrLJ-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-01 12:04 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-01 12:04 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <YfkhsiWHzsyQSBfl-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-01 12:11 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-01 12:11 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <Yfkjjamj09lZn4sA-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-01 15:29 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-01 15:29 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <YflR3/RuGjYuQZPH-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-03 9:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-03 9:54 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <YfumP3u1VCjKHE3b-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-03 10:09 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-03 10:09 ` Michal Hocko
[not found] ` <Yfup9THPcSIPDSoH-2MMpYkNvuYDjFM9bn6wA6Q@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-03 11:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-03 11:09 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-08 17:58 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-02-08 17:58 ` Shakeel Butt
[not found] ` <CALvZod7yovQ5OTWr=k_eiEBVb1LTRvPkbsY8joAtyigQnvBUww-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-09 9:17 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-09 9:17 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-26 16:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-01-26 16:57 ` Vlastimil Babka
[not found] ` <7f4928b8-16e2-88b3-2688-1519a19653a9-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-01-31 15:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-31 15:06 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <Yff69slA4UTz5Q1Y-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-03 16:01 ` Vlastimil Babka
2022-02-03 16:01 ` Vlastimil Babka
[not found] ` <e068646f-c7f2-5876-8577-6ddf93df07d0-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-08 17:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-02-08 17:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
[not found] ` <YgKlr+sHZPayWKUP-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
2022-02-08 17:28 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-08 17:28 ` Michal Hocko
2022-02-09 1:48 ` [mm/memcg] 86895e1e85: WARNING:possible_circular_locking_dependency_detected kernel test robot
2022-02-09 1:48 ` kernel test robot
2022-01-25 16:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/memcg: Allow the task_obj optimization only on non-PREEMPTIBLE kernels Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-25 16:43 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-25 23:21 ` [PATCH 0/4] mm/memcg: Address PREEMPT_RT problems instead of disabling it Andrew Morton
2022-01-25 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20220125152146.d7e25afe3b8a6807df6fee3f-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2022-01-26 7:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2022-01-26 7:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-07-12 11:22 [PATCH 0/4] Backport MEMCG changes from v5.17 David Oberhollenzer
2022-07-12 11:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/memcg: Add a local_lock_t for IRQ and TASK object David Oberhollenzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YfKHxKda7bGJmrLJ@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy-hfztesqfncyowbw4kg4ksq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=longman-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mhocko-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mkoutny-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.