From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Fixing chained events, and PMUv3p5 support
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:46:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvP8/m9uDI2PcyoP@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220805135813.2102034-1-maz@kernel.org>
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Ricardo recently reported[1] that our PMU emulation was busted when it
> comes to chained events, as we cannot expose the overflow on a 32bit
> boundary (which the architecture requires).
>
> This series aims at fixing this (by deleting a lot of code), and as a
> bonus adds support for PMUv3p5, as this requires us to fix a few more
> things.
>
> Tested on A53 (PMUv3) and FVP (PMUv3p5).
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220805004139.990531-1-ricarkol@google.com
>
> Marc Zyngier (9):
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Align chained counter implementation with
> architecture pseudocode
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Distinguish between 64bit counter and 64bit overflow
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Only narrow counters that are not 64bit wide
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Add counter_index_to_*reg() helpers
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Simplify setting a counter to a specific value
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Move the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver limit to VM creation
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Aleven ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver to be set from userspace
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement PMUv3p5 long counter support
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Aleven PMUv3p5 to be exposed to the guest
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 6 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 372 ++++++++++--------------------
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 65 +++++-
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 16 +-
> 5 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Hi Marc,
There is one extra potential issue with exposing PMUv3p5. I see this
weird behavior when doing passthrough ("bare metal") on the fast-model
configured to emulate PMUv3p5: the [63:32] half of the counters
overflowing at 32-bits is still incremented.
Fast model - ARMv8.5:
Assuming the initial state is even=0xFFFFFFFF and odd=0x0,
incrementing the even counter leads to:
0x00000001_00000000 0x00000000_00000001 0x1
even counter odd counter PMOVSET
Assuming the initial state is even=0xFFFFFFFF and odd=0xFFFFFFFF,
incrementing the even counter leads to:
0x00000001_00000000 0x00000001_00000000 0x3
even counter odd counter PMOVSET
More specifically, the pmu-chained-sw-incr kvm-unit-test fails when
doing passthrough of PMUv3p5 (fast model - ARMv8.5):
INFO: PMU version: 0x5
INFO: PMU implementer/ID code: 0x41("A")/0
INFO: Implements 8 event counters
PASS: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow and chain counter incremented after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN
INFO: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow=0x1, #0=4294967380 #1=1
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#0=0x00000001_00000054
#1=0x00000000_00000001
FAIL: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: expected overflows and values after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN
INFO: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow=0x3, #0=4294967380 #1=4294967296
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#0=0x00000001_00000054
#1=0x00000001_00000000
There's really no good use for this behavior, and not sure if it's worth
emulating it. Can't find any reference in the ARM ARM.
Thanks,
Ricardo
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Fixing chained events, and PMUv3p5 support
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:46:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvP8/m9uDI2PcyoP@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220805135813.2102034-1-maz@kernel.org>
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Ricardo recently reported[1] that our PMU emulation was busted when it
> comes to chained events, as we cannot expose the overflow on a 32bit
> boundary (which the architecture requires).
>
> This series aims at fixing this (by deleting a lot of code), and as a
> bonus adds support for PMUv3p5, as this requires us to fix a few more
> things.
>
> Tested on A53 (PMUv3) and FVP (PMUv3p5).
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220805004139.990531-1-ricarkol@google.com
>
> Marc Zyngier (9):
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Align chained counter implementation with
> architecture pseudocode
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Distinguish between 64bit counter and 64bit overflow
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Only narrow counters that are not 64bit wide
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Add counter_index_to_*reg() helpers
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Simplify setting a counter to a specific value
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Move the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver limit to VM creation
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Aleven ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver to be set from userspace
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement PMUv3p5 long counter support
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Aleven PMUv3p5 to be exposed to the guest
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 6 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 372 ++++++++++--------------------
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 65 +++++-
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 16 +-
> 5 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Hi Marc,
There is one extra potential issue with exposing PMUv3p5. I see this
weird behavior when doing passthrough ("bare metal") on the fast-model
configured to emulate PMUv3p5: the [63:32] half of the counters
overflowing at 32-bits is still incremented.
Fast model - ARMv8.5:
Assuming the initial state is even=0xFFFFFFFF and odd=0x0,
incrementing the even counter leads to:
0x00000001_00000000 0x00000000_00000001 0x1
even counter odd counter PMOVSET
Assuming the initial state is even=0xFFFFFFFF and odd=0xFFFFFFFF,
incrementing the even counter leads to:
0x00000001_00000000 0x00000001_00000000 0x3
even counter odd counter PMOVSET
More specifically, the pmu-chained-sw-incr kvm-unit-test fails when
doing passthrough of PMUv3p5 (fast model - ARMv8.5):
INFO: PMU version: 0x5
INFO: PMU implementer/ID code: 0x41("A")/0
INFO: Implements 8 event counters
PASS: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow and chain counter incremented after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN
INFO: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow=0x1, #0=4294967380 #1=1
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#0=0x00000001_00000054
#1=0x00000000_00000001
FAIL: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: expected overflows and values after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN
INFO: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow=0x3, #0=4294967380 #1=4294967296
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#0=0x00000001_00000054
#1=0x00000001_00000000
There's really no good use for this behavior, and not sure if it's worth
emulating it. Can't find any reference in the ARM ARM.
Thanks,
Ricardo
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Fixing chained events, and PMUv3p5 support
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2022 11:46:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvP8/m9uDI2PcyoP@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220805135813.2102034-1-maz@kernel.org>
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 02:58:04PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Ricardo recently reported[1] that our PMU emulation was busted when it
> comes to chained events, as we cannot expose the overflow on a 32bit
> boundary (which the architecture requires).
>
> This series aims at fixing this (by deleting a lot of code), and as a
> bonus adds support for PMUv3p5, as this requires us to fix a few more
> things.
>
> Tested on A53 (PMUv3) and FVP (PMUv3p5).
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220805004139.990531-1-ricarkol@google.com
>
> Marc Zyngier (9):
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Align chained counter implementation with
> architecture pseudocode
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Distinguish between 64bit counter and 64bit overflow
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Only narrow counters that are not 64bit wide
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Add counter_index_to_*reg() helpers
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Simplify setting a counter to a specific value
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Move the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver limit to VM creation
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Aleven ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver to be set from userspace
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement PMUv3p5 long counter support
> KVM: arm64: PMU: Aleven PMUv3p5 to be exposed to the guest
>
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 6 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 372 ++++++++++--------------------
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 65 +++++-
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 16 +-
> 5 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 252 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Hi Marc,
There is one extra potential issue with exposing PMUv3p5. I see this
weird behavior when doing passthrough ("bare metal") on the fast-model
configured to emulate PMUv3p5: the [63:32] half of the counters
overflowing at 32-bits is still incremented.
Fast model - ARMv8.5:
Assuming the initial state is even=0xFFFFFFFF and odd=0x0,
incrementing the even counter leads to:
0x00000001_00000000 0x00000000_00000001 0x1
even counter odd counter PMOVSET
Assuming the initial state is even=0xFFFFFFFF and odd=0xFFFFFFFF,
incrementing the even counter leads to:
0x00000001_00000000 0x00000001_00000000 0x3
even counter odd counter PMOVSET
More specifically, the pmu-chained-sw-incr kvm-unit-test fails when
doing passthrough of PMUv3p5 (fast model - ARMv8.5):
INFO: PMU version: 0x5
INFO: PMU implementer/ID code: 0x41("A")/0
INFO: Implements 8 event counters
PASS: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow and chain counter incremented after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN
INFO: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow=0x1, #0=4294967380 #1=1
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#0=0x00000001_00000054
#1=0x00000000_00000001
FAIL: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: expected overflows and values after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN
INFO: pmu: pmu-chained-sw-incr: overflow=0x3, #0=4294967380 #1=4294967296
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#0=0x00000001_00000054
#1=0x00000001_00000000
There's really no good use for this behavior, and not sure if it's worth
emulating it. Can't find any reference in the ARM ARM.
Thanks,
Ricardo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-10 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 114+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-05 13:58 [PATCH 0/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Fixing chained events, and PMUv3p5 support Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 1/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Align chained counter implementation with architecture pseudocode Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 17:21 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 17:21 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 17:21 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-23 4:30 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-23 4:30 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-23 4:30 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-24 10:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-24 10:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-24 10:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-27 14:33 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-27 14:33 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-27 14:33 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-27 15:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-27 15:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-27 15:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 2/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Distinguish between 64bit counter and 64bit overflow Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 3/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Only narrow counters that are not 64bit wide Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-24 4:07 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-24 4:07 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-24 4:07 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 4/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Add counter_index_to_*reg() helpers Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 7:17 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 7:17 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 7:17 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 17:23 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 17:23 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 17:23 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-24 4:27 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-24 4:27 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-24 4:27 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 5/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Simplify setting a counter to a specific value Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 15:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 15:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 15:41 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 6/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Move the ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver limit to VM creation Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-26 4:34 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-26 4:34 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-26 4:34 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-26 6:02 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-26 6:02 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-26 6:02 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-26 14:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-26 14:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-26 14:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-27 16:09 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-27 16:09 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-27 16:09 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-10-27 17:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-27 17:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-27 17:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 7/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUver to be set from userspace Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 7:08 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 7:08 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 7:08 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 9:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 9:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 9:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-26 7:01 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-26 7:01 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-26 7:01 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 8/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Implement PMUv3p5 long counter support Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 7:16 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 7:16 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 7:16 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 9:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 9:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 9:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-27 7:09 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-27 7:09 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-27 7:09 ` Reiji Watanabe
2022-08-05 13:58 ` [PATCH 9/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Allow PMUv3p5 to be exposed to the guest Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-05 13:58 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-10 7:16 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 7:16 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 7:16 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 18:46 ` Ricardo Koller [this message]
2022-08-10 18:46 ` [PATCH 0/9] KVM: arm64: PMU: Fixing chained events, and PMUv3p5 support Ricardo Koller
2022-08-10 18:46 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-08-10 19:33 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 19:33 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 19:33 ` Oliver Upton
2022-08-10 21:55 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-08-10 21:55 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-08-10 21:55 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-08-11 12:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-11 12:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-11 12:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-08-12 22:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-08-12 22:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-08-12 22:53 ` Ricardo Koller
2022-10-24 18:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-24 18:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2022-10-24 18:05 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvP8/m9uDI2PcyoP@google.com \
--to=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.