From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>,
Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the STE generation for S1 and S2 domains into functions
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:50:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbpeQt_nyCiFRrcv@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4-v4-c93b774edcc4+42d2b-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com>
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:57:14PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This is preparation to move the STE calculation higher up in to the call
> chain and remove arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(). These new functions will be
> called directly from attach_dev.
>
> Reviewed-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 115 +++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index df8fc7b87a7907..910156881423e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1516,13 +1516,68 @@ static void arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target)
> FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG, STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG_INCOMING));
> }
>
> +static void arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target,
> + struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> + struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table)
master already include cd_table in "master->cd_table", why do we need to
pass it separately?
> +{
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> +
> + memset(target, 0, sizeof(*target));
> + target->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(
> + STRTAB_STE_0_V |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, cd_table->s1fmt) |
> + (cd_table->cdtab_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, cd_table->s1cdmax));
> +
> + target->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CIR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1COR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CSH, ARM_SMMU_SH_ISH) |
> + ((smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS &&
> + !master->stall_enabled) ?
> + STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD :
> + 0) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> + master->ats_enabled ? STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS : 0) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_STRW,
> + (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_E2H) ?
> + STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_EL2 :
> + STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_NSEL1));
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target,
> + struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
Similary, master already has the domain in "master->domain".
> +{
> + struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg *s2_cfg = &smmu_domain->s2_cfg;
> +
> + memset(target, 0, sizeof(*target));
> + target->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(
> + STRTAB_STE_0_V |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S2_TRANS));
> +
> + target->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> + master->ats_enabled ? STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS : 0));
> +
> + target->data[2] = cpu_to_le64(
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_S2VMID, s2_cfg->vmid) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_VTCR, s2_cfg->vtcr) |
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2AA64 |
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2ENDI |
> +#endif
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2PTW |
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2R);
> +
> + target->data[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
> +}
> +
> static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
> struct arm_smmu_ste *dst)
> {
> - u64 val;
> - struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> - struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = NULL;
> - struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg *s2_cfg = NULL;
> struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = master->domain;
> struct arm_smmu_ste target = {};
>
> @@ -1537,61 +1592,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>
> switch (smmu_domain->stage) {
> case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1:
> - cd_table = &master->cd_table;
> + arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(&target, master, &master->cd_table);
> break;
> case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2:
> - s2_cfg = &smmu_domain->s2_cfg;
> + arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(&target, master, smmu_domain);
> break;
> case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS:
> arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(&target);
> - arm_smmu_write_ste(master, sid, dst, &target);
> - return;
> + break;
> }
> -
> - /* Nuke the existing STE_0 value, as we're going to rewrite it */
> - val = STRTAB_STE_0_V;
> -
> - if (cd_table) {
> - u64 strw = smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_E2H ?
> - STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_EL2 : STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_NSEL1;
> -
> - target.data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CIR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1COR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CSH, ARM_SMMU_SH_ISH) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_STRW, strw));
> -
> - if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS &&
> - !master->stall_enabled)
> - target.data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
> -
> - val |= (cd_table->cdtab_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, cd_table->s1cdmax) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, cd_table->s1fmt);
> - }
> -
> - if (s2_cfg) {
> - target.data[2] = cpu_to_le64(
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_S2VMID, s2_cfg->vmid) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_VTCR, s2_cfg->vtcr) |
> -#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> - STRTAB_STE_2_S2ENDI |
> -#endif
> - STRTAB_STE_2_S2PTW | STRTAB_STE_2_S2AA64 |
> - STRTAB_STE_2_S2R);
> -
> - target.data[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
> -
> - val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S2_TRANS);
> - }
> -
> - if (master->ats_enabled)
> - target.data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> - STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS));
> -
> - target.data[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
> arm_smmu_write_ste(master, sid, dst, &target);
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Thanks,
Mostafa
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>,
Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
patches@lists.linux.dev,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the STE generation for S1 and S2 domains into functions
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:50:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZbpeQt_nyCiFRrcv@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4-v4-c93b774edcc4+42d2b-smmuv3_newapi_p1_jgg@nvidia.com>
Hi Jason,
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 07:57:14PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This is preparation to move the STE calculation higher up in to the call
> chain and remove arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(). These new functions will be
> called directly from attach_dev.
>
> Reviewed-by: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 115 +++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index df8fc7b87a7907..910156881423e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1516,13 +1516,68 @@ static void arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target)
> FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG, STRTAB_STE_1_SHCFG_INCOMING));
> }
>
> +static void arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target,
> + struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> + struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table)
master already include cd_table in "master->cd_table", why do we need to
pass it separately?
> +{
> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> +
> + memset(target, 0, sizeof(*target));
> + target->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(
> + STRTAB_STE_0_V |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, cd_table->s1fmt) |
> + (cd_table->cdtab_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, cd_table->s1cdmax));
> +
> + target->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CIR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1COR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CSH, ARM_SMMU_SH_ISH) |
> + ((smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS &&
> + !master->stall_enabled) ?
> + STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD :
> + 0) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> + master->ats_enabled ? STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS : 0) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_STRW,
> + (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_E2H) ?
> + STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_EL2 :
> + STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_NSEL1));
> +}
> +
> +static void arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(struct arm_smmu_ste *target,
> + struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain)
Similary, master already has the domain in "master->domain".
> +{
> + struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg *s2_cfg = &smmu_domain->s2_cfg;
> +
> + memset(target, 0, sizeof(*target));
> + target->data[0] = cpu_to_le64(
> + STRTAB_STE_0_V |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S2_TRANS));
> +
> + target->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> + master->ats_enabled ? STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS : 0));
> +
> + target->data[2] = cpu_to_le64(
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_S2VMID, s2_cfg->vmid) |
> + FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_VTCR, s2_cfg->vtcr) |
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2AA64 |
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2ENDI |
> +#endif
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2PTW |
> + STRTAB_STE_2_S2R);
> +
> + target->data[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
> +}
> +
> static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
> struct arm_smmu_ste *dst)
> {
> - u64 val;
> - struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> - struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = NULL;
> - struct arm_smmu_s2_cfg *s2_cfg = NULL;
> struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = master->domain;
> struct arm_smmu_ste target = {};
>
> @@ -1537,61 +1592,15 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_strtab_ent(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 sid,
>
> switch (smmu_domain->stage) {
> case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S1:
> - cd_table = &master->cd_table;
> + arm_smmu_make_cdtable_ste(&target, master, &master->cd_table);
> break;
> case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_S2:
> - s2_cfg = &smmu_domain->s2_cfg;
> + arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste(&target, master, smmu_domain);
> break;
> case ARM_SMMU_DOMAIN_BYPASS:
> arm_smmu_make_bypass_ste(&target);
> - arm_smmu_write_ste(master, sid, dst, &target);
> - return;
> + break;
> }
> -
> - /* Nuke the existing STE_0 value, as we're going to rewrite it */
> - val = STRTAB_STE_0_V;
> -
> - if (cd_table) {
> - u64 strw = smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_E2H ?
> - STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_EL2 : STRTAB_STE_1_STRW_NSEL1;
> -
> - target.data[1] = cpu_to_le64(
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS, STRTAB_STE_1_S1DSS_SSID0) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CIR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1COR, STRTAB_STE_1_S1C_CACHE_WBRA) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_S1CSH, ARM_SMMU_SH_ISH) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_STRW, strw));
> -
> - if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_STALLS &&
> - !master->stall_enabled)
> - target.data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(STRTAB_STE_1_S1STALLD);
> -
> - val |= (cd_table->cdtab_dma & STRTAB_STE_0_S1CTXPTR_MASK) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S1_TRANS) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1CDMAX, cd_table->s1cdmax) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT, cd_table->s1fmt);
> - }
> -
> - if (s2_cfg) {
> - target.data[2] = cpu_to_le64(
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_S2VMID, s2_cfg->vmid) |
> - FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_2_VTCR, s2_cfg->vtcr) |
> -#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
> - STRTAB_STE_2_S2ENDI |
> -#endif
> - STRTAB_STE_2_S2PTW | STRTAB_STE_2_S2AA64 |
> - STRTAB_STE_2_S2R);
> -
> - target.data[3] = cpu_to_le64(s2_cfg->vttbr & STRTAB_STE_3_S2TTB_MASK);
> -
> - val |= FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_0_CFG, STRTAB_STE_0_CFG_S2_TRANS);
> - }
> -
> - if (master->ats_enabled)
> - target.data[1] |= cpu_to_le64(FIELD_PREP(STRTAB_STE_1_EATS,
> - STRTAB_STE_1_EATS_TRANS));
> -
> - target.data[0] = cpu_to_le64(val);
> arm_smmu_write_ste(master, sid, dst, &target);
> }
>
> --
> 2.43.0
Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Thanks,
Mostafa
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-31 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-25 23:57 [PATCH v4 00/16] Update SMMUv3 to the modern iommu API (part 1/3) Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 01/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Make STE programming independent of the callers Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-26 4:03 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-26 4:03 ` Michael Shavit
2024-01-29 19:53 ` Moritz Fischer
2024-01-29 19:53 ` Moritz Fischer
2024-01-30 22:42 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-30 22:42 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-30 23:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-30 23:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 02/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Consolidate the STE generation for abort/bypass Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:40 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:40 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 14:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 11:32 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 11:32 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 13:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 03/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move arm_smmu_rmr_install_bypass_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 15:07 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 15:07 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 15:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 15:43 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 04/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Move the STE generation for S1 and S2 domains into functions Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 14:50 ` Mostafa Saleh [this message]
2024-01-31 14:50 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-31 15:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-31 15:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 05/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Build the whole STE in arm_smmu_make_s2_domain_ste() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 11:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 11:34 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 06/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Hold arm_smmu_asid_lock during all of attach_dev Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 12:15 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 12:15 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 13:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 13:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-13 13:30 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-13 13:30 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 07/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Compute the STE only once for each master Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-01 12:18 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-02-01 12:18 ` Mostafa Saleh
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 08/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Do not change the STE twice during arm_smmu_attach_dev() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 09/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Put writing the context descriptor in the right order Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 10/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass smmu_domain to arm_enable/disable_ats() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 11/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Remove arm_smmu_master->domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 12/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static IDENTITY domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 18:11 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 18:11 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-29 18:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-29 18:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-30 8:35 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-30 8:35 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 13/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a global static BLOCKED domain Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 14/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Use the identity/blocked domain during release Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 15/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pass arm_smmu_domain and arm_smmu_device to finalize Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 16/16] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Convert to domain_alloc_paging() Jason Gunthorpe
2024-01-25 23:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZbpeQt_nyCiFRrcv@google.com \
--to=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=moritzf@google.com \
--cc=mshavit@google.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.