* Re: [PATCH] bio-integrity: don't restrict the size of integrity metadata
2024-09-03 19:47 [PATCH] bio-integrity: don't restrict the size of integrity metadata Mikulas Patocka
@ 2024-09-04 2:57 ` Ming Lei
2024-09-04 5:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ming Lei @ 2024-09-04 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikulas Patocka
Cc: Jens Axboe, Jinyoung Choi, Christoph Hellwig, Martin K. Petersen,
Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, linux-block, dm-devel, ming.lei
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 09:47:59PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Hi Jens
>
> I added dm-integrity inline mode in the 6.11 merge window. I've found out
> that it doesn't work with large bios - the reason is that the function
> bio_integrity_add_page refuses to add more metadata than
> queue_max_hw_sectors(q). This restriction is no longer needed, because
> big bios are split automatically. I'd like to ask you if you could send
> this commit to Linus before 6.11 comes out, so that the bug is fixed
> before the final release.
>
> Mikulas
>
>
> From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
>
> bio_integrity_add_page restricts the size of the integrity metadata to
> queue_max_hw_sectors(q). This restriction is not needed because oversized
> bios are split automatically. This restriction causes problems with
> dm-integrity 'inline' mode - if we send a large bio to dm-integrity and
> the bio's metadata are larger than queue_max_hw_sectors(q),
> bio_integrity_add_page fails and the bio is ended with BLK_STS_RESOURCE
> error.
>
> An example that triggers it:
>
> # modprobe brd rd_size=1048576
> # dmsetup create in1 --table '0 1847320 integrity /dev/ram0 0 64 D 1 fix_padding'
> # dmsetup create in2 --table '0 1847312 integrity /dev/mapper/in1 0 64 I 1 internal_hash:sha512'
> # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/mapper/in2 bs=1M oflag=direct status=progress
> dd: error writing '/dev/mapper/in2': Cannot allocate memory
> 1+0 records in
> 0+0 records out
> 0 bytes copied, 0.00169291 s, 0.0 kB/s
>
> Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
> Fixes: fb0987682c62 ("dm-integrity: introduce the Inline mode")
> Fixes: 0ece1d649b6d ("bio-integrity: create multi-page bvecs in bio_integrity_add_page()")
Firstly meta size is always < bio size.
Secondly the check isn't needed either bio_integrity_add_page() is called on
to-be-splited bio(DM), or splited bio(blk-mq).
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] bio-integrity: don't restrict the size of integrity metadata
2024-09-03 19:47 [PATCH] bio-integrity: don't restrict the size of integrity metadata Mikulas Patocka
2024-09-04 2:57 ` Ming Lei
@ 2024-09-04 5:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-09-04 13:02 ` Anuj gupta
2024-09-04 13:17 ` Jens Axboe
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2024-09-04 5:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikulas Patocka
Cc: Jens Axboe, Jinyoung Choi, Christoph Hellwig, Martin K. Petersen,
Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, linux-block, dm-devel
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 09:47:59PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> Hi Jens
>
> I added dm-integrity inline mode in the 6.11 merge window. I've found out
> that it doesn't work with large bios - the reason is that the function
> bio_integrity_add_page refuses to add more metadata than
> queue_max_hw_sectors(q). This restriction is no longer needed, because
> big bios are split automatically. I'd like to ask you if you could send
> this commit to Linus before 6.11 comes out, so that the bug is fixed
> before the final release.
This looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Although between the patches from Keith and the prep patch for the
io_uring metadata series I'm not sure that splitting of bios with
integrity actually fully works. Although until we get the io_uring
passthrough code in we also won't have an easy way to exercise it either.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bio-integrity: don't restrict the size of integrity metadata
2024-09-03 19:47 [PATCH] bio-integrity: don't restrict the size of integrity metadata Mikulas Patocka
2024-09-04 2:57 ` Ming Lei
2024-09-04 5:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2024-09-04 13:02 ` Anuj gupta
2024-09-04 13:17 ` Jens Axboe
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Anuj gupta @ 2024-09-04 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikulas Patocka
Cc: Jens Axboe, Jinyoung Choi, Christoph Hellwig, Martin K. Petersen,
Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, linux-block, dm-devel
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 1:18 AM Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jens
>
> I added dm-integrity inline mode in the 6.11 merge window. I've found out
> that it doesn't work with large bios - the reason is that the function
> bio_integrity_add_page refuses to add more metadata than
> queue_max_hw_sectors(q). This restriction is no longer needed, because
> big bios are split automatically. I'd like to ask you if you could send
> this commit to Linus before 6.11 comes out, so that the bug is fixed
> before the final release.
Tested-by: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@samsung.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bio-integrity: don't restrict the size of integrity metadata
2024-09-03 19:47 [PATCH] bio-integrity: don't restrict the size of integrity metadata Mikulas Patocka
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-04 13:02 ` Anuj gupta
@ 2024-09-04 13:17 ` Jens Axboe
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2024-09-04 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikulas Patocka
Cc: Jinyoung Choi, Christoph Hellwig, Martin K. Petersen,
Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, linux-block, dm-devel
On Tue, 03 Sep 2024 21:47:59 +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> I added dm-integrity inline mode in the 6.11 merge window. I've found out
> that it doesn't work with large bios - the reason is that the function
> bio_integrity_add_page refuses to add more metadata than
> queue_max_hw_sectors(q). This restriction is no longer needed, because
> big bios are split automatically. I'd like to ask you if you could send
> this commit to Linus before 6.11 comes out, so that the bug is fixed
> before the final release.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] bio-integrity: don't restrict the size of integrity metadata
commit: b858a36fe9a1261dfd097aec855161ad135bed60
Best regards,
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread