[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH v3] [net-next] igb: Fix 2 typos in comments in igb_main.c

[Johnny Park <pjohnny0508@gmail.com>]

Fix 2 spelling mistakes in comments in `igb_main.c`.

Signed-off-by: Johnny Park <pjohnny0508@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v3:
  - Adjust commit message

Changes in v2:
  - Fix spelling mor -> more
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index 1ef4cb871452..fc587304b3c0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -1204,7 +1204,7 @@ static int igb_alloc_q_vector(struct igb_adapter *adapter,
 	/* initialize pointer to rings */
 	ring = q_vector->ring;
 
-	/* intialize ITR */
+	/* initialize ITR */
 	if (rxr_count) {
 		/* rx or rx/tx vector */
 		if (!adapter->rx_itr_setting || adapter->rx_itr_setting > 3)
@@ -3906,7 +3906,7 @@ static void igb_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
  *
  *  This function initializes the vf specific data storage and then attempts to
  *  allocate the VFs.  The reason for ordering it this way is because it is much
- *  mor expensive time wise to disable SR-IOV than it is to allocate and free
+ *  more expensive time wise to disable SR-IOV than it is to allocate and free
  *  the memory for the VFs.
  **/
 static void igb_probe_vfs(struct igb_adapter *adapter)
-- 
2.43.0