All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Marcel Apfelbaum" <marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com>,
	"Fabiano Rosas" <farosas@suse.de>,
	"Laurent Vivier" <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	"Phil Dennis-Jordan" <phil@philjordan.eu>,
	"Bernhard Beschow" <shentey@gmail.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/22] usb/msd: Allow CBW packet size greater than 31
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 12:50:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBiX9sg56lcNIjDn@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250502033047.102465-16-npiggin@gmail.com>

Am 02.05.2025 um 05:30 hat Nicholas Piggin geschrieben:
> The CBW structure is 31 bytes, so CBW DATAOUT packets must be at least
> 31 bytes. QEMU enforces exactly 31 bytes, but this is inconsistent with
> how it handles CSW packets (where it allows greater than or equal to 13
> bytes) despite wording in the spec[*] being similar for both packet
> types: "shall end as a short packet with exactly 31 bytes transferred".
> 
>   [*] USB MSD Bulk-Only Transport 1.0
> 
> For consistency, and on the principle of being tolerant in accepting
> input, relax the CBW size check.
> 
> Alternatively, both checks could be tightened to exact. Or a message
> could be printed warning of possible guest error if size is not exact,
> but still accept the packets.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

This doesn't look right to me.

CBW is a message from the host to the device. The device must fully
validate the data in it (see "6.2 Valid and Meaningful CBW"). My
understanding is that a wrong CBW size is an error.

CSW is a message from the device to the host, i.e. the iovec doesn't
really have any content when we get it. It's essentially just a buffer
in which usb-storage has to construct a valid CSW (of the exact size
13). If the buffer is larger than it has to be, that's a different case
than receiving a CBW of the wrong size. I'm not entirely sure what the
mechanism is to send exactly 13 bytes, but I assume it's related to
p->actual_length, which is updated in usb_packet_copy().

Actually, if we reject too small buffers, why do we even need the MIN()
in usb_msd_send_status()? Shouldn't len be an unconditional CSW_SIZE?

Kevin



  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-05 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-02  3:30 [PATCH v4 00/22] usb/xhci and usb/msd improvements and tests Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 01/22] hw/usb/xhci: Move HCD constants to a header and add register constants Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-12 12:25   ` Peter Maydell
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 02/22] hw/usb/xhci: Rename and move HCD register region constants to header Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-12 12:29   ` Peter Maydell
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 03/22] tests/qtest/xhci: test the qemu-xhci device Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-19 13:54   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 04/22] tests/qtest/xhci: Add controller and device setup and ring tests Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-19 14:03   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 05/22] tests/qtest/xhci: Add basic USB Mass Storage tests Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-19 14:44   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 06/22] hw/usb/xhci: Support TR NOOP commands Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-12 13:06   ` Peter Maydell
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 07/22] tests/qtest/xhci: add a test for " Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-19 14:54   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 08/22] tests/qtest/usb-hcd-xhci: Deliver msix interrupts Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-02  8:24   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2025-05-05  1:05     ` Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 09/22] hw/usb/hcd-xhci-pci: Make PCI device more configurable Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-12 13:12   ` Peter Maydell
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 10/22] hw/usb/hcd-xhci-pci: Add TI TUSB73X0 XHCI controller model Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-12 13:15   ` Peter Maydell
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 11/22] usb/msd: Split in and out packet handling Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-05  9:22   ` Kevin Wolf
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 12/22] usb/msd: Ensure packet structure layout is correct Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-05  9:30   ` Kevin Wolf
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 13/22] usb/msd: Improved handling of mass storage reset Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 14/22] usb/msd: Improve packet validation error logging Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-05 10:26   ` Kevin Wolf
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 15/22] usb/msd: Allow CBW packet size greater than 31 Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-05 10:50   ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 16/22] usb/msd: Split async packet tracking into data and csw Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-05 13:05   ` Kevin Wolf
2025-05-05 14:04     ` Kevin Wolf
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 17/22] usb/msd: Add some additional assertions Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 18/22] usb/msd: Rename mode to cbw_state, and tweak names Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 19/22] usb/msd: Add NODATA CBW state Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 20/22] usb/msd: Permit a DATA-IN or CSW packet before CBW packet Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 21/22] tests/qtest/xhci: Test USB Mass Storage relaxed CSW order Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-19 15:03   ` Fabiano Rosas
2025-05-02  3:30 ` [PATCH v4 22/22] usb/msd: Add more tracing Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-05  2:03 ` [PATCH v4 00/22] usb/xhci and usb/msd improvements and tests Nicholas Piggin
2025-05-05  9:02   ` Kevin Wolf
2025-05-12 13:20     ` Peter Maydell
2025-05-12 15:33       ` Fabiano Rosas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aBiX9sg56lcNIjDn@redhat.com \
    --to=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=farosas@suse.de \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=phil@philjordan.eu \
    --cc=philmd@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shentey@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.