All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	<eric.auger@redhat.com>, <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	<jgg@nvidia.com>, <ddutile@redhat.com>, <berrange@redhat.com>,
	<nathanc@nvidia.com>, <mochs@nvidia.com>, <smostafa@google.com>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
	<jiangkunkun@huawei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	<zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>, <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
	<shameerkolothum@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 06/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Restrict accelerated SMMUv3 to vfio-pci endpoints with iommufd
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 17:55:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJKn650gOGQh2whD@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714155941.22176-7-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>

Hi Shameer,

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 04:59:32PM +0100, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> @@ -25,30 +31,72 @@ static SMMUv3AccelDevice *smmuv3_accel_get_dev(SMMUState *bs, SMMUPciBus *sbus,
>  
>          sbus->pbdev[devfn] = sdev;
>          smmu_init_sdev(bs, sdev, bus, devfn);
> +        address_space_init(&accel_dev->as_sysmem, &s->s_accel->root,
> +                           "smmuv3-accel-sysmem");
>      }
>  
>      return accel_dev;
>  }
[..]
>  static AddressSpace *smmuv3_accel_find_add_as(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque,
>                                                int devfn)
>  {
> +    PCIDevice *pdev = pci_find_device(bus, pci_bus_num(bus), devfn);
>      SMMUState *bs = opaque;
> +    bool vfio_pci = false;
>      SMMUPciBus *sbus;
>      SMMUv3AccelDevice *accel_dev;
>      SMMUDevice *sdev;
>  
> +    if (pdev && !smmuv3_accel_pdev_allowed(pdev, &vfio_pci)) {
> +        error_report("Device(%s) not allowed. Only PCIe root complex devices "
> +                     "or PCI bridge devices or vfio-pci endpoint devices with "
> +                     "iommufd as backend is allowed with arm-smmuv3,accel=on",
> +                     pdev->name);
> +        exit(1);
> +    }
>      sbus = smmu_get_sbus(bs, bus);
>      accel_dev = smmuv3_accel_get_dev(bs, sbus, bus, devfn);
>      sdev = &accel_dev->sdev;
>  
> -    return &sdev->as;
> +    if (vfio_pci) {
> +        return &accel_dev->as_sysmem;

I found a new problem here that we initialize new as_sysmem per
VFIO device. So, sdevs would return own individual AS pointers
here at this get_address_space function, although they point to
the same system address space.

Since address space pointers are returned differently for VFIO
devices, this fails to reuse ioas_id in iommufd_cdev_attach(),
and ends up with allocating a new ioas for each device.

I think we can try the following change to make sure all accel
linked VFIO devices would share the same ioas_id, though I am
not sure if SMMUBaseClass is the right place to go. Please take
a look.

Then, once kernel is patched to share S2 hwpt across vSMMUs,
iommufd_cdev_attach() will go further to reuse the S2 HWPT in
the same container.

Thanks
Nicolin

---
 hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.c        | 14 ++++++++++----
 hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.h        |  2 +-
 include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.c b/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.c
index c6dc50cf45..405b72095f 100644
--- a/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.c
+++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.c
@@ -370,13 +370,19 @@ static SMMUv3AccelDevice *smmuv3_accel_get_dev(SMMUState *bs, SMMUPciBus *sbus,
     if (sdev) {
         accel_dev = container_of(sdev, SMMUv3AccelDevice, sdev);
     } else {
+        SMMUBaseClass *sbc = ARM_SMMU_GET_CLASS(s);
+
         accel_dev = g_new0(SMMUv3AccelDevice, 1);
         sdev = &accel_dev->sdev;
 
         sbus->pbdev[devfn] = sdev;
         smmu_init_sdev(bs, sdev, bus, devfn);
-        address_space_init(&accel_dev->as_sysmem, &s->s_accel->root,
-                           "smmuv3-accel-sysmem");
+        if (!sbc->as_sysmem) {
+            sbc->as_sysmem = g_new0(AddressSpace, 1);
+            address_space_init(sbc->as_sysmem, &s->s_accel->root,
+                               "smmuv3-accel-sysmem");
+        }
+        accel_dev->as_sysmem = sbc->as_sysmem;
     }
 
     return accel_dev;
@@ -558,7 +564,7 @@ static AddressSpace *smmuv3_accel_find_msi_as(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque,
     if (accel_dev->s1_hwpt) {
         return &sdev->as;
     } else {
-        return &accel_dev->as_sysmem;
+        return accel_dev->as_sysmem;
     }
 }
 
@@ -599,7 +605,7 @@ static AddressSpace *smmuv3_accel_find_add_as(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque,
     sdev = &accel_dev->sdev;
 
     if (vfio_pci) {
-        return &accel_dev->as_sysmem;
+        return accel_dev->as_sysmem;
     } else {
         return &sdev->as;
     }
diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.h b/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.h
index e1e99598b4..9faa0818d7 100644
--- a/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.h
+++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3-accel.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ typedef struct SMMUS1Hwpt {
 
 typedef struct SMMUv3AccelDevice {
     SMMUDevice  sdev;
-    AddressSpace as_sysmem;
+    AddressSpace *as_sysmem;
     HostIOMMUDeviceIOMMUFD *idev;
     SMMUS1Hwpt  *s1_hwpt;
     SMMUViommu *viommu;
diff --git a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
index c459d24427..9bb9554435 100644
--- a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
+++ b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
@@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ struct SMMUState {
 struct SMMUBaseClass {
     /* <private> */
     SysBusDeviceClass parent_class;
+    /* FIXME is there any better shared place for different vSMMU instances? */
+    AddressSpace *as_sysmem;
 
     /*< public >*/
 
-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-06  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 165+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-14 15:59 [RFC PATCH v3 00/15] hw/arm/virt: Add support for user-creatable accelerated SMMUv3 Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/15] backends/iommufd: Introduce iommufd_backend_alloc_viommu Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 16:22   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15  9:14   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15  9:14     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/15] backends/iommufd: Introduce iommufd_vdev_alloc Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 16:27   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15  9:19   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15  9:19     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/15] hw/arm/smmu-common: Factor out common helper functions and export Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-15  9:27   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15  9:27     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/15] hw/arm/smmu-common: Introduce smmu_iommu_ops_by_type() helper Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 16:38   ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 16:38     ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-15  9:30   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15  9:30     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-09-04  7:55   ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Introduce smmuv3 accel device Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 17:23   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-04 14:33     ` Eric Auger
2025-09-05  8:22       ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-05 10:17         ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08  9:15           ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-09 13:38             ` Eric Auger
2025-07-15  9:45   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15  9:45     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:48   ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-15 17:29     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16  3:38       ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-16  9:27         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16  9:27           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-09-04 14:31           ` Eric Auger
2025-09-10 16:10             ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Restrict accelerated SMMUv3 to vfio-pci endpoints with iommufd Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 18:18   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15  9:51   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15  9:51     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:53   ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-15 17:59     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16  6:26       ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-16  9:34         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16  9:34           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 10:32           ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-16 17:51           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 18:21             ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05  8:34             ` Eric Auger
2025-09-05  8:14         ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08  7:41           ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-09 13:34             ` Eric Auger
2025-07-16  8:06       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16  8:06         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-09-05  8:29         ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08  7:55           ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-08-06  0:55   ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-09-16 10:33     ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-17 18:45       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-17 18:52         ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-17 19:04           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-18 13:31           ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-18 22:00             ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-19  7:38               ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-19 18:36                 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-20 13:03                 ` Peter Maydell
2025-09-22  8:28                   ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-05  8:42   ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08  8:03     ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/15] hw/arm/smmuv3: Implement get_viommu_cap() callback Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 18:31   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05  8:49   ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08  8:22     ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-08 13:40       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09 13:37         ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Add set/unset_iommu_device callback Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 19:11   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 10:29   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:29     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 17:01     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16  9:33       ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-16  9:33         ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-09-05  9:27   ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08  8:49     ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Support nested STE install/uninstall support Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 19:37   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 23:12   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16  8:36     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16  8:36       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 18:17       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05  9:51       ` Eric Auger
2025-09-05  9:40   ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Allocate a vDEVICE object for device Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 19:43   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05  9:57   ` Eric Auger
2025-09-05 18:36     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/15] hw/pci/pci: Introduce optional get_msi_address_space() callback Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 19:50   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 10:11     ` Eric Auger
2025-09-05 10:11   ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Introduce helpers to batch and issue cache invalidations Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 19:55   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 10:39   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:39     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 17:07     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 10:31   ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08  9:59     ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-08 19:29       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/15] hw/arm/smmuv3: Forward invalidation commands to hw Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-15 10:46   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:46     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 17:22     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16  7:32       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16  7:32         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-09-05 12:45   ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08 12:22     ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-08 20:12       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-09 13:43       ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/15] Read and validate host SMMUv3 feature bits Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 20:04   ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 20:04     ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 20:24     ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 20:24       ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-15 10:48   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:48     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-16  2:57   ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-16  2:57     ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-16 10:26     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 10:26       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 18:37       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 11:51     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 17:35       ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 17:45         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 18:09           ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 18:42             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 18:53               ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 13:04           ` Eric Auger
2025-07-22 17:42   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 13:20   ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/15] hw/arm/smmu-common: Add accel property for SMMU dev Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59   ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 20:00   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 10:49   ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:49     ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-09-05 10:36   ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 16:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/15] hw/arm/virt: Add support for user-creatable accelerated SMMUv3 Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 16:14   ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 20:22   ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 20:22     ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-15 10:46 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-16  7:27   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16  7:27     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aJKn650gOGQh2whD@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=nathanc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=shameerkolothum@gmail.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.