From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>
To: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>
Cc: <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
<eric.auger@redhat.com>, <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
<jgg@nvidia.com>, <nicolinc@nvidia.com>, <ddutile@redhat.com>,
<berrange@redhat.com>, <nathanc@nvidia.com>, <mochs@nvidia.com>,
<smostafa@google.com>, <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
<jiangkunkun@huawei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
<zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>, <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
<shameerkolothum@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 08/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Add set/unset_iommu_device callback
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 11:29:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250715112941.00005348@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714155941.22176-9-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:59:34 +0100
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
>
> Implement a set_iommu_device callback:
> -If found an existing viommu reuse that.
> (Devices behind the same physical SMMU should share an S2 HWPT)
> -Else,
> Allocate a viommu with the nested parent S2 hwpt allocated by VFIO.
> Allocate bypass and abort hwpt.
> -And add the dev to viommu device list
>
> Also add an unset_iommu_device to unwind/cleanup above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
One questions inline plus trivial stuff. I'm not yet up to speed with
all the iommufd stuff so this is rather superficial for now.
> +static bool
> +smmuv3_accel_dev_alloc_viommu(SMMUv3AccelDevice *accel_dev,
> + HostIOMMUDeviceIOMMUFD *idev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + struct iommu_hwpt_arm_smmuv3 bypass_data = {
> + .ste = { SMMU_STE_CFG_BYPASS | SMMU_STE_VALID, 0x0ULL },
> + };
> + struct iommu_hwpt_arm_smmuv3 abort_data = {
> + .ste = { SMMU_STE_VALID, 0x0ULL },
> + };
> + SMMUDevice *sdev = &accel_dev->sdev;
> + SMMUState *bs = sdev->smmu;
> + SMMUv3State *s = ARM_SMMUV3(bs);
> + SMMUv3AccelState *s_accel = s->s_accel;
> + uint32_t s2_hwpt_id = idev->hwpt_id;
> + SMMUS2Hwpt *s2_hwpt;
> + SMMUViommu *viommu;
> + uint32_t viommu_id;
> +
> + if (s_accel->viommu) {
> + accel_dev->viommu = s_accel->viommu;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if (!iommufd_backend_alloc_viommu(idev->iommufd, idev->devid,
> + IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3,
> + s2_hwpt_id, &viommu_id, errp)) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + viommu = g_new0(SMMUViommu, 1);
> + viommu->core.viommu_id = viommu_id;
> + viommu->core.s2_hwpt_id = s2_hwpt_id;
> + viommu->core.iommufd = idev->iommufd;
> +
> + if (!iommufd_backend_alloc_hwpt(idev->iommufd, idev->devid,
> + viommu->core.viommu_id, 0,
> + IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_ARM_SMMUV3,
> + sizeof(abort_data), &abort_data,
> + &viommu->abort_hwpt_id, errp)) {
> + goto free_viommu;
> + }
> +
> + if (!iommufd_backend_alloc_hwpt(idev->iommufd, idev->devid,
> + viommu->core.viommu_id, 0,
> + IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_ARM_SMMUV3,
> + sizeof(bypass_data), &bypass_data,
> + &viommu->bypass_hwpt_id, errp)) {
> + goto free_abort_hwpt;
> + }
> +
> + s2_hwpt = g_new(SMMUS2Hwpt, 1);
> + s2_hwpt->iommufd = idev->iommufd;
> + s2_hwpt->hwpt_id = s2_hwpt_id;
> +
> + viommu->iommufd = idev->iommufd;
> + viommu->s2_hwpt = s2_hwpt;
> +
> + s_accel->viommu = viommu;
> + accel_dev->viommu = viommu;
> + return true;
> +
> +free_abort_hwpt:
> + iommufd_backend_free_id(idev->iommufd, viommu->abort_hwpt_id);
> +free_viommu:
> + iommufd_backend_free_id(idev->iommufd, viommu->core.viommu_id);
> + g_free(viommu);
No unwinding of iommufd_backened_alloc_viommu?
Looks like we just leak it until destruction of the fd.
Maybe add a comment for those like me who aren't all that familiar with
this stuff and see an alloc with no matching free.
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static bool smmuv3_accel_set_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int devfn,
> + HostIOMMUDevice *hiod, Error **errp)
> +{
> + HostIOMMUDeviceIOMMUFD *idev = HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_IOMMUFD(hiod);
> + SMMUState *bs = opaque;
> + SMMUv3State *s = ARM_SMMUV3(bs);
> + SMMUv3AccelState *s_accel = s->s_accel;
> + SMMUPciBus *sbus = smmu_get_sbus(bs, bus);
> + SMMUv3AccelDevice *accel_dev = smmuv3_accel_get_dev(bs, sbus, bus, devfn);
> + SMMUDevice *sdev = &accel_dev->sdev;
> +
> + if (!idev) {
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if (accel_dev->idev) {
> + if (accel_dev->idev != idev) {
> + error_report("Device 0x%x already has an associated idev",
> + smmu_get_sid(sdev));
> + return false;
> + } else {
No need for else as other path already returned.
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!smmuv3_accel_dev_alloc_viommu(accel_dev, idev, errp)) {
> + error_report("Device 0x%x: Unable to alloc viommu", smmu_get_sid(sdev));
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + accel_dev->idev = idev;
> + QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&s_accel->viommu->device_list, accel_dev, next);
> + trace_smmuv3_accel_set_iommu_device(devfn, smmu_get_sid(sdev));
> + return true;
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/arm/trace-events b/hw/arm/trace-events
> index f3386bd7ae..c4537ca1d6 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/arm/trace-events
> @@ -66,6 +66,10 @@ smmuv3_notify_flag_del(const char *iommu) "DEL SMMUNotifier node for iommu mr=%s
> smmuv3_inv_notifiers_iova(const char *name, int asid, int vmid, uint64_t iova, uint8_t tg, uint64_t num_pages, int stage) "iommu mr=%s asid=%d vmid=%d iova=0x%"PRIx64" tg=%d num_pages=0x%"PRIx64" stage=%d"
> smmu_reset_exit(void) ""
>
> +#smmuv3-accel.c
> +smmuv3_accel_set_iommu_device(int devfn, uint32_t sid) "devfn=0x%x (sid=0x%x)"
> +smmuv3_accel_unset_iommu_device(int devfn, uint32_t sid) "devfn=0x%x (sid=0x%x"
bracket?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron via <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>
Cc: <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>, <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
<eric.auger@redhat.com>, <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
<jgg@nvidia.com>, <nicolinc@nvidia.com>, <ddutile@redhat.com>,
<berrange@redhat.com>, <nathanc@nvidia.com>, <mochs@nvidia.com>,
<smostafa@google.com>, <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
<jiangkunkun@huawei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
<zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>, <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>,
<shameerkolothum@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 08/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Add set/unset_iommu_device callback
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 11:29:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250715112941.00005348@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714155941.22176-9-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
On Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:59:34 +0100
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> wrote:
> From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
>
> Implement a set_iommu_device callback:
> -If found an existing viommu reuse that.
> (Devices behind the same physical SMMU should share an S2 HWPT)
> -Else,
> Allocate a viommu with the nested parent S2 hwpt allocated by VFIO.
> Allocate bypass and abort hwpt.
> -And add the dev to viommu device list
>
> Also add an unset_iommu_device to unwind/cleanup above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
One questions inline plus trivial stuff. I'm not yet up to speed with
all the iommufd stuff so this is rather superficial for now.
> +static bool
> +smmuv3_accel_dev_alloc_viommu(SMMUv3AccelDevice *accel_dev,
> + HostIOMMUDeviceIOMMUFD *idev, Error **errp)
> +{
> + struct iommu_hwpt_arm_smmuv3 bypass_data = {
> + .ste = { SMMU_STE_CFG_BYPASS | SMMU_STE_VALID, 0x0ULL },
> + };
> + struct iommu_hwpt_arm_smmuv3 abort_data = {
> + .ste = { SMMU_STE_VALID, 0x0ULL },
> + };
> + SMMUDevice *sdev = &accel_dev->sdev;
> + SMMUState *bs = sdev->smmu;
> + SMMUv3State *s = ARM_SMMUV3(bs);
> + SMMUv3AccelState *s_accel = s->s_accel;
> + uint32_t s2_hwpt_id = idev->hwpt_id;
> + SMMUS2Hwpt *s2_hwpt;
> + SMMUViommu *viommu;
> + uint32_t viommu_id;
> +
> + if (s_accel->viommu) {
> + accel_dev->viommu = s_accel->viommu;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if (!iommufd_backend_alloc_viommu(idev->iommufd, idev->devid,
> + IOMMU_VIOMMU_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3,
> + s2_hwpt_id, &viommu_id, errp)) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + viommu = g_new0(SMMUViommu, 1);
> + viommu->core.viommu_id = viommu_id;
> + viommu->core.s2_hwpt_id = s2_hwpt_id;
> + viommu->core.iommufd = idev->iommufd;
> +
> + if (!iommufd_backend_alloc_hwpt(idev->iommufd, idev->devid,
> + viommu->core.viommu_id, 0,
> + IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_ARM_SMMUV3,
> + sizeof(abort_data), &abort_data,
> + &viommu->abort_hwpt_id, errp)) {
> + goto free_viommu;
> + }
> +
> + if (!iommufd_backend_alloc_hwpt(idev->iommufd, idev->devid,
> + viommu->core.viommu_id, 0,
> + IOMMU_HWPT_DATA_ARM_SMMUV3,
> + sizeof(bypass_data), &bypass_data,
> + &viommu->bypass_hwpt_id, errp)) {
> + goto free_abort_hwpt;
> + }
> +
> + s2_hwpt = g_new(SMMUS2Hwpt, 1);
> + s2_hwpt->iommufd = idev->iommufd;
> + s2_hwpt->hwpt_id = s2_hwpt_id;
> +
> + viommu->iommufd = idev->iommufd;
> + viommu->s2_hwpt = s2_hwpt;
> +
> + s_accel->viommu = viommu;
> + accel_dev->viommu = viommu;
> + return true;
> +
> +free_abort_hwpt:
> + iommufd_backend_free_id(idev->iommufd, viommu->abort_hwpt_id);
> +free_viommu:
> + iommufd_backend_free_id(idev->iommufd, viommu->core.viommu_id);
> + g_free(viommu);
No unwinding of iommufd_backened_alloc_viommu?
Looks like we just leak it until destruction of the fd.
Maybe add a comment for those like me who aren't all that familiar with
this stuff and see an alloc with no matching free.
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +static bool smmuv3_accel_set_iommu_device(PCIBus *bus, void *opaque, int devfn,
> + HostIOMMUDevice *hiod, Error **errp)
> +{
> + HostIOMMUDeviceIOMMUFD *idev = HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_IOMMUFD(hiod);
> + SMMUState *bs = opaque;
> + SMMUv3State *s = ARM_SMMUV3(bs);
> + SMMUv3AccelState *s_accel = s->s_accel;
> + SMMUPciBus *sbus = smmu_get_sbus(bs, bus);
> + SMMUv3AccelDevice *accel_dev = smmuv3_accel_get_dev(bs, sbus, bus, devfn);
> + SMMUDevice *sdev = &accel_dev->sdev;
> +
> + if (!idev) {
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + if (accel_dev->idev) {
> + if (accel_dev->idev != idev) {
> + error_report("Device 0x%x already has an associated idev",
> + smmu_get_sid(sdev));
> + return false;
> + } else {
No need for else as other path already returned.
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!smmuv3_accel_dev_alloc_viommu(accel_dev, idev, errp)) {
> + error_report("Device 0x%x: Unable to alloc viommu", smmu_get_sid(sdev));
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + accel_dev->idev = idev;
> + QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&s_accel->viommu->device_list, accel_dev, next);
> + trace_smmuv3_accel_set_iommu_device(devfn, smmu_get_sid(sdev));
> + return true;
> +}
> diff --git a/hw/arm/trace-events b/hw/arm/trace-events
> index f3386bd7ae..c4537ca1d6 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/arm/trace-events
> @@ -66,6 +66,10 @@ smmuv3_notify_flag_del(const char *iommu) "DEL SMMUNotifier node for iommu mr=%s
> smmuv3_inv_notifiers_iova(const char *name, int asid, int vmid, uint64_t iova, uint8_t tg, uint64_t num_pages, int stage) "iommu mr=%s asid=%d vmid=%d iova=0x%"PRIx64" tg=%d num_pages=0x%"PRIx64" stage=%d"
> smmu_reset_exit(void) ""
>
> +#smmuv3-accel.c
> +smmuv3_accel_set_iommu_device(int devfn, uint32_t sid) "devfn=0x%x (sid=0x%x)"
> +smmuv3_accel_unset_iommu_device(int devfn, uint32_t sid) "devfn=0x%x (sid=0x%x"
bracket?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 165+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 15:59 [RFC PATCH v3 00/15] hw/arm/virt: Add support for user-creatable accelerated SMMUv3 Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 01/15] backends/iommufd: Introduce iommufd_backend_alloc_viommu Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 16:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 9:14 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 9:14 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 02/15] backends/iommufd: Introduce iommufd_vdev_alloc Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 16:27 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 9:19 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 9:19 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 03/15] hw/arm/smmu-common: Factor out common helper functions and export Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-15 9:27 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 9:27 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 04/15] hw/arm/smmu-common: Introduce smmu_iommu_ops_by_type() helper Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 16:38 ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 16:38 ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-15 9:30 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 9:30 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-09-04 7:55 ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 05/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Introduce smmuv3 accel device Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 17:23 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-04 14:33 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-05 8:22 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-05 10:17 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08 9:15 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-09 13:38 ` Eric Auger
2025-07-15 9:45 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 9:45 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:48 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-15 17:29 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 3:38 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-16 9:27 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 9:27 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-09-04 14:31 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-10 16:10 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 06/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Restrict accelerated SMMUv3 to vfio-pci endpoints with iommufd Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 18:18 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 9:51 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 9:51 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:53 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-15 17:59 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 6:26 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-16 9:34 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 9:34 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 10:32 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-16 17:51 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 18:21 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 8:34 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-05 8:14 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08 7:41 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-09 13:34 ` Eric Auger
2025-07-16 8:06 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 8:06 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-09-05 8:29 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08 7:55 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-08-06 0:55 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-16 10:33 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-17 18:45 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-17 18:52 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-17 19:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-18 13:31 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-18 22:00 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-19 7:38 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-19 18:36 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-20 13:03 ` Peter Maydell
2025-09-22 8:28 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-05 8:42 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08 8:03 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 07/15] hw/arm/smmuv3: Implement get_viommu_cap() callback Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 18:31 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 8:49 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08 8:22 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-08 13:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-09 13:37 ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 08/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Add set/unset_iommu_device callback Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 19:11 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 10:29 ` Jonathan Cameron via [this message]
2025-07-15 10:29 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 17:01 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 9:33 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-16 9:33 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-09-05 9:27 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08 8:49 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 09/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Support nested STE install/uninstall support Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 19:37 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 23:12 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 8:36 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 8:36 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 18:17 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 9:51 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-05 9:40 ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 10/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Allocate a vDEVICE object for device Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 19:43 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 9:57 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-05 18:36 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 11/15] hw/pci/pci: Introduce optional get_msi_address_space() callback Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 19:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 10:11 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-05 10:11 ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 12/15] hw/arm/smmuv3-accel: Introduce helpers to batch and issue cache invalidations Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 19:55 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 10:39 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:39 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 17:07 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 10:31 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08 9:59 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-08 19:29 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 13/15] hw/arm/smmuv3: Forward invalidation commands to hw Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-15 10:46 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:46 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 17:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 7:32 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 7:32 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-09-05 12:45 ` Eric Auger
2025-09-08 12:22 ` Shameer Kolothum
2025-09-08 20:12 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-09 13:43 ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 14/15] Read and validate host SMMUv3 feature bits Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 20:04 ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 20:04 ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 20:24 ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 20:24 ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-15 10:48 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:48 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-16 2:57 ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-16 2:57 ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-16 10:26 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 10:26 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 18:37 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 11:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 17:35 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 17:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 18:09 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 18:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-16 18:53 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 13:04 ` Eric Auger
2025-07-22 17:42 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-05 13:20 ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 15:59 ` [RFC PATCH v3 15/15] hw/arm/smmu-common: Add accel property for SMMU dev Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 15:59 ` Shameer Kolothum via
2025-07-14 20:00 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 10:49 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-07-15 10:49 ` Jonathan Cameron via
2025-09-05 10:36 ` Eric Auger
2025-07-14 16:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 00/15] hw/arm/virt: Add support for user-creatable accelerated SMMUv3 Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 16:14 ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 20:22 ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-14 20:22 ` Nicolin Chen via
2025-07-15 10:46 ` Duan, Zhenzhong
2025-07-16 7:27 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
2025-07-16 7:27 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250715112941.00005348@huawei.com \
--to=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiangkunkun@huawei.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=mochs@nvidia.com \
--cc=nathanc@nvidia.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=shameerkolothum@gmail.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
--cc=zhenzhong.duan@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.