From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Cc: fw@strlen.de, phil@nwl.cc, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: nf_flow_table_offload: fix heap overflow in flow_action_entry_next()
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2026 11:41:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa1SZwjQZ1Fbsj_e@chamomile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aaxe-uH2Qr6qM4E9@v4bel>
On Sun, Mar 08, 2026 at 02:23:06AM +0900, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> flow_action_entry_next() increments num_entries and returns a pointer
> into the flow_action_entry array without any bounds checking. The array
> is allocated with a fixed size of NF_FLOW_RULE_ACTION_MAX (16) entries,
> but certain combinations of IPv6 + SNAT + DNAT + double VLAN (QinQ)
> require 17 or more entries, causing a slab-out-of-bounds write in the
> kmalloc-4k slab.
>
> The maximum possible entry count is:
> tunnel(2) + eth(4) + VLAN(4) + IPv6_NAT(10) + redirect(1) = 21
There is no hardware offload for the:
- tunnel support
- IPv6 NAT
This is all very hypothetical.
> Increase NF_FLOW_RULE_ACTION_MAX to 24 (with headroom) to cover the
> worst case.
>
> Fixes: efce49dfe6a8 ("netfilter: flowtable: add vlan pop action offload support")
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
> index 9b677e116487..e843f6d0355e 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_offload.c
> @@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ int nf_flow_rule_route_ipv6(struct net *net, struct flow_offload *flow,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_flow_rule_route_ipv6);
>
> -#define NF_FLOW_RULE_ACTION_MAX 16
> +#define NF_FLOW_RULE_ACTION_MAX 24
>
> static struct nf_flow_rule *
> nf_flow_offload_rule_alloc(struct net *net,
> --
> 2.43.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-08 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-07 17:23 [PATCH net] netfilter: nf_flow_table_offload: fix heap overflow in flow_action_entry_next() Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-07 19:04 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-16 10:53 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-16 11:23 ` Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-16 11:31 ` Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-16 11:48 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-16 11:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-16 14:17 ` Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-16 14:58 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-25 14:27 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-25 15:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-08 10:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2026-03-26 21:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa1SZwjQZ1Fbsj_e@chamomile \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.