From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, phil@nwl.cc, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
horms@kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: nf_flow_table_offload: fix heap overflow in flow_action_entry_next()
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2026 20:04:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aax2yZtJce0d19gd@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aaxe-uH2Qr6qM4E9@v4bel>
Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com> wrote:
> flow_action_entry_next() increments num_entries and returns a pointer
> into the flow_action_entry array without any bounds checking. The array
> is allocated with a fixed size of NF_FLOW_RULE_ACTION_MAX (16) entries,
> but certain combinations of IPv6 + SNAT + DNAT + double VLAN (QinQ)
> require 17 or more entries, causing a slab-out-of-bounds write in the
> kmalloc-4k slab.
>
> The maximum possible entry count is:
> tunnel(2) + eth(4) + VLAN(4) + IPv6_NAT(10) + redirect(1) = 21
>
> Increase NF_FLOW_RULE_ACTION_MAX to 24 (with headroom) to cover the
>
> -#define NF_FLOW_RULE_ACTION_MAX 16
> +#define NF_FLOW_RULE_ACTION_MAX 24
This fix looks rather fragile.
What guarantees that this stays right-sized?
Can you add a BUILD_BUG_ON or if needed, run-time check?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-07 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-07 17:23 [PATCH net] netfilter: nf_flow_table_offload: fix heap overflow in flow_action_entry_next() Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-07 19:04 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2026-03-16 10:53 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-16 11:23 ` Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-16 11:31 ` Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-16 11:48 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-16 11:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-16 14:17 ` Hyunwoo Kim
2026-03-16 14:58 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-25 14:27 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-25 15:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-08 10:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-26 21:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aax2yZtJce0d19gd@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=imv4bel@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.