Status of squashfs?

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* Status of squashfs?
@ 2007-05-22  3:52 Rob Landley
  2007-05-22  4:03 ` Roland Dreier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rob Landley @ 2007-05-22  3:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

So Fedora uses squashfs, Ubuntu uses, squashfs, Gentoo uses squashfs...  It 
seems like the only place I can get a kernel _without_ squashfs is 
kernel.org.

Is there a reason for this?

Rob

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Status of squashfs?
  2007-05-22  3:52 Status of squashfs? Rob Landley
@ 2007-05-22  4:03 ` Roland Dreier
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Roland Dreier @ 2007-05-22  4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Landley; +Cc: linux-kernel

 > So Fedora uses squashfs, Ubuntu uses, squashfs, Gentoo uses squashfs...  It 
 > seems like the only place I can get a kernel _without_ squashfs is 
 > kernel.org.
 > 
 > Is there a reason for this?

Has anyone tried to merge it upstream?  Do the squashfs developers
want to merge it?

 - R.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-22  4:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-22  3:52 Status of squashfs? Rob Landley
2007-05-22  4:03 ` Roland Dreier

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.