From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
npiggin@suse.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or suspending
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:04:49 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906120800450.3237@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906121201490.30049@melkki.cs.Helsinki.FI>
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>
> + if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> + local_flags &= ~__GFP_WAIT;
> +
> + might_sleep_if(local_flags & __GFP_WAIT);
This is pointless.
You're doing the "might_sleep_if()" way too late. At that point, you've
already lost 99% of all coverage, since now none of the cases of just
finding a free slab entry on the list will ever trigger that
"might_sleep()" case.
So you need to do this _early_, at the entry-point, not late, at cache
re-fill time.
So rather than removing the might_sleep_if() at the early point, and then
moving it to this late stage (because you only do the local_flags fixups
late), you need to move the local-flags fixup early instead, and do the
might_sleep_it() there.
The whole point of "might_sleep()" is that it triggers every time if
something is called in the wrong context - not just for the cases where it
actually _does_ sleep.
Linus
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Pekka J Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
npiggin@suse.de, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or suspending
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:04:49 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906120800450.3237@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0906121201490.30049@melkki.cs.Helsinki.FI>
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
>
> + if (system_state != SYSTEM_RUNNING)
> + local_flags &= ~__GFP_WAIT;
> +
> + might_sleep_if(local_flags & __GFP_WAIT);
This is pointless.
You're doing the "might_sleep_if()" way too late. At that point, you've
already lost 99% of all coverage, since now none of the cases of just
finding a free slab entry on the list will ever trigger that
"might_sleep()" case.
So you need to do this _early_, at the entry-point, not late, at cache
re-fill time.
So rather than removing the might_sleep_if() at the early point, and then
moving it to this late stage (because you only do the local_flags fixups
late), you need to move the local-flags fixup early instead, and do the
might_sleep_it() there.
The whole point of "might_sleep()" is that it triggers every time if
something is called in the wrong context - not just for the cases where it
actually _does_ sleep.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-12 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-12 8:13 [PATCH 2/2] slab,slub: ignore __GFP_WAIT if we're booting or suspending Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 8:13 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 9:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 9:03 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 9:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 9:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 9:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 9:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 9:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 9:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 9:45 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 9:45 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 9:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 9:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 10:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 10:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:22 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12 15:22 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12 9:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 9:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 9:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 9:52 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 9:54 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 9:54 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 9:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 9:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25 4:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-25 4:38 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 10:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 10:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-06-12 10:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 10:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 10:15 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 10:15 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 10:30 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 10:30 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-12 10:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 10:32 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-12 15:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-12 15:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 11:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:24 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 11:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 11:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 11:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12 15:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12 21:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 21:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25 4:41 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-25 4:41 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-12 11:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 11:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-12 15:04 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-06-12 15:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-12 15:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-12 15:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-19 14:59 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-19 14:59 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-19 22:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-19 22:27 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-19 23:23 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-19 23:23 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-19 23:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-19 23:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-20 0:28 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-20 0:28 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-20 2:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-20 2:10 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-21 6:18 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-21 6:18 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-21 9:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-21 9:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25 4:34 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-25 4:34 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-25 9:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-06-25 9:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0906120800450.3237@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.