From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: "Carlos López" <clopez@suse.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, seanjc@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
david@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 20:59:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avd4MOhiTCw0I_e1@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112142039.907090-2-clopez@suse.de>
Sorry but as I said to David I really question what you're doing with this
series on the mm side, and I wonder whether we should even consider it for
this cycle, frankly, given [0].
And, myself being the fool who is engaged in the Sisyphean task of
converting VMA flags everywhere, you can imagine my delight when I saw that
you (seemingly quite knowingly!) chose to abuse that API, writing code that
I'll personally have to rewrite later.
Don't do that please :)
Please also do not keep respinning based on sashiko feedback. FIRST get a
clear understanding of what maintainers want.
Sashiko is a bug finder, not a reviewer.
And see [1]:
"Wait for a minimum of one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers -
possibly longer during busy times like merge windows."
Please only respin once a week at the minimum.
--
Cheers, Lorenzo
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/a2f584f6-e382-4876-aa6d-d5a34de6ee59@kernel.org/
[1]:https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#don-t-get-discouraged-or-impatient
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
To: "Carlos López" <clopez@suse.de>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, seanjc@google.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
david@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 20:59:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avd4MOhiTCw0I_e1@gremlin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112142039.907090-2-clopez@suse.de>
Sorry but as I said to David I really question what you're doing with this
series on the mm side, and I wonder whether we should even consider it for
this cycle, frankly, given [0].
And, myself being the fool who is engaged in the Sisyphean task of
converting VMA flags everywhere, you can imagine my delight when I saw that
you (seemingly quite knowingly!) chose to abuse that API, writing code that
I'll personally have to rewrite later.
Don't do that please :)
Please also do not keep respinning based on sashiko feedback. FIRST get a
clear understanding of what maintainers want.
Sashiko is a bug finder, not a reviewer.
And see [1]:
"Wait for a minimum of one week before resubmitting or pinging reviewers -
possibly longer during busy times like merge windows."
Please only respin once a week at the minimum.
--
Cheers, Lorenzo
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/a2f584f6-e382-4876-aa6d-d5a34de6ee59@kernel.org/
[1]:https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#don-t-get-discouraged-or-impatient
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 14:20 [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] mm: fix eager write-bit restore for write-notified shared mappings Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 20:47 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-13 20:47 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] riscv: mm: add pud_soft_dirty() Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] mm/huge_memory: honor MM_CP_TRY_CHANGE_WRITABLE in change_huge_pud() Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 18:58 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 18:58 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 20:48 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-13 20:48 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] mm: keep writable entries writable on protection changes Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 18:56 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 18:56 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] mm/mprotect: add MM_CP_PERM_UPGRADE Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 18:51 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 18:51 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 20:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-13 20:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] mm/mmu_notifier: add MMU_NOTIFIER_RANGE_PERM_UPGRADE Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM: pass the mmu_notifier event and flags to kvm_gfn_range Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: x86/mmu: don't zap secondary MMU on permission upgrade Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-12 14:20 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: s390: don't unmap the gmap " Carlos López
2026-11-12 14:20 ` Carlos López
2026-11-13 14:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 19:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] KVM: don't zap secondary MMU " David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 19:00 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-11-13 20:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-13 20:32 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-11-13 20:59 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) [this message]
2026-11-13 20:59 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avd4MOhiTCw0I_e1@gremlin \
--to=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clopez@suse.de \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.