* [LARTC] iptables vs tc @ 2002-05-04 5:39 Chris Ellsworth 2002-05-04 7:15 ` Stef Coene 2002-05-04 7:38 ` Martin Devera 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Chris Ellsworth @ 2002-05-04 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: lartc Since monitoring this list and others i see people use both iptables and tc to assign packets on a bridge to the correct class for bandwidth control, what is the plus/minus of each? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] iptables vs tc 2002-05-04 5:39 [LARTC] iptables vs tc Chris Ellsworth @ 2002-05-04 7:15 ` Stef Coene 2002-05-04 7:38 ` Martin Devera 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Stef Coene @ 2002-05-04 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: lartc On Saturday 04 May 2002 07:39, Chris Ellsworth wrote: > Since monitoring this list and others i see people use both iptables > and tc to assign packets on a bridge to the correct class for > bandwidth control, what is the plus/minus of each? It depends on wich syntax you know the best :) Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] iptables vs tc 2002-05-04 5:39 [LARTC] iptables vs tc Chris Ellsworth 2002-05-04 7:15 ` Stef Coene @ 2002-05-04 7:38 ` Martin Devera 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Martin Devera @ 2002-05-04 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: lartc tc being more universal (can do non-IP, rsvp, diffserv) but more coomplex to understand. iptables are well known but as name implies - IP only. devik On Fri, 3 May 2002, Chris Ellsworth wrote: > Since monitoring this list and others i see people use both iptables > and tc to assign packets on a bridge to the correct class for > bandwidth control, what is the plus/minus of each? > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-04 7:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2002-05-04 5:39 [LARTC] iptables vs tc Chris Ellsworth 2002-05-04 7:15 ` Stef Coene 2002-05-04 7:38 ` Martin Devera
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.