* [LARTC] iptables vs tc
@ 2002-05-04 5:39 Chris Ellsworth
2002-05-04 7:15 ` Stef Coene
2002-05-04 7:38 ` Martin Devera
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ellsworth @ 2002-05-04 5:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
Since monitoring this list and others i see people use both iptables
and tc to assign packets on a bridge to the correct class for
bandwidth control, what is the plus/minus of each?
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] iptables vs tc
2002-05-04 5:39 [LARTC] iptables vs tc Chris Ellsworth
@ 2002-05-04 7:15 ` Stef Coene
2002-05-04 7:38 ` Martin Devera
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stef Coene @ 2002-05-04 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
On Saturday 04 May 2002 07:39, Chris Ellsworth wrote:
> Since monitoring this list and others i see people use both iptables
> and tc to assign packets on a bridge to the correct class for
> bandwidth control, what is the plus/minus of each?
It depends on wich syntax you know the best :)
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [LARTC] iptables vs tc
2002-05-04 5:39 [LARTC] iptables vs tc Chris Ellsworth
2002-05-04 7:15 ` Stef Coene
@ 2002-05-04 7:38 ` Martin Devera
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Martin Devera @ 2002-05-04 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lartc
tc being more universal (can do non-IP, rsvp, diffserv) but
more coomplex to understand. iptables are well known but
as name implies - IP only.
devik
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Chris Ellsworth wrote:
> Since monitoring this list and others i see people use both iptables
> and tc to assign packets on a bridge to the correct class for
> bandwidth control, what is the plus/minus of each?
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-04 7:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-04 5:39 [LARTC] iptables vs tc Chris Ellsworth
2002-05-04 7:15 ` Stef Coene
2002-05-04 7:38 ` Martin Devera
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.