[LARTC] bridging troubles

[LARTC] bridging troubles

[Padraig Brady]

Hi, I would like to be able to control
the slave devices of a bridge independently
of the bridge interface. For e.g. if I have
eth0 and eth1 in a bridge eth0-eth1, then
I the following doesn't give an error,
but doesn't actually work either?

ip link set dev eth0 promisc on

However this does work?

ip link set dev eth0 down

Is this a bug?

cheers,
Pádraig.

p.s. the bridge mailing list web site doesn't work

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] bridging troubles

[Padraig Brady]

Robert Kurjata wrote:
> Witaj Padraig,
> 
> W Twoim liœcie datowanym 24 listopada 2003 (14:18:04) mo¿na przeczytaæ:
> 
> PB> Hi, I would like to be able to control
> PB> the slave devices of a bridge independently
> PB> of the bridge interface. For e.g. if I have
> PB> eth0 and eth1 in a bridge eth0-eth1, then
> PB> I the following doesn't give an error,
> PB> but doesn't actually work either?
> 
> PB> ip link set dev eth0 promisc on
> 
> AFAIR in the bridge the interfaces MUST be in promisc mode for the
> bridge to work at all. So the command above has no meaning.

Well it does if I want to stop traffic temporarily.

> PB> However this does work?
> 
> PB> ip link set dev eth0 down

this does stop traffic temporarily, but
has other side affects I don't want.

Pádraig.

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/