From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: I/O topology fixes for big physical block size
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:48:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1wrq5aels.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CA1198A.2050004@fusionio.com> (Jens Axboe's message of "Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:24:10 +0900")
>>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com> writes:
Jens> With the revised understanding that this is purely the IO hint,
Jens> then yes I agree we should not clamp it.
Ok, here's an updated sd patch that does not print a warning...
sd: Fix overflow with big physical blocks
The hw_sector_size variable could overflow if a device reported huge
physical blocks. Switch to the more accurate physical_block_size
terminology and make sure we use an unsigned int to match the range
permitted by READ CAPACITY(16).
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index ffa0689..5446c4d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -1554,7 +1554,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
}
/* Logical blocks per physical block exponent */
- sdkp->hw_sector_size = (1 << (buffer[13] & 0xf)) * sector_size;
+ sdkp->physical_block_size = (1 << (buffer[13] & 0xf)) * sector_size;
/* Lowest aligned logical block */
alignment = ((buffer[14] & 0x3f) << 8 | buffer[15]) * sector_size;
@@ -1567,7 +1567,7 @@ static int read_capacity_16(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
struct request_queue *q = sdp->request_queue;
sdkp->thin_provisioning = 1;
- q->limits.discard_granularity = sdkp->hw_sector_size;
+ q->limits.discard_granularity = sdkp->physical_block_size;
q->limits.max_discard_sectors = 0xffffffff;
if (buffer[14] & 0x40) /* TPRZ */
@@ -1635,7 +1635,7 @@ static int read_capacity_10(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct scsi_device *sdp,
}
sdkp->capacity = lba + 1;
- sdkp->hw_sector_size = sector_size;
+ sdkp->physical_block_size = sector_size;
return sector_size;
}
@@ -1756,10 +1756,10 @@ got_data:
(unsigned long long)sdkp->capacity,
sector_size, cap_str_10, cap_str_2);
- if (sdkp->hw_sector_size != sector_size)
+ if (sdkp->physical_block_size != sector_size)
sd_printk(KERN_NOTICE, sdkp,
"%u-byte physical blocks\n",
- sdkp->hw_sector_size);
+ sdkp->physical_block_size);
}
}
@@ -1773,7 +1773,8 @@ got_data:
else if (sector_size == 256)
sdkp->capacity >>= 1;
- blk_queue_physical_block_size(sdp->request_queue, sdkp->hw_sector_size);
+ blk_queue_physical_block_size(sdp->request_queue,
+ sdkp->physical_block_size);
sdkp->device->sector_size = sector_size;
}
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.h b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
index f81a930..f947140 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ struct scsi_disk {
atomic_t openers;
sector_t capacity; /* size in 512-byte sectors */
u32 index;
- unsigned short hw_sector_size;
+ unsigned int physical_block_size;
u8 media_present;
u8 write_prot;
u8 protection_type;/* Data Integrity Field */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-28 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 16:41 I/O topology fixes for big physical block size Martin K. Petersen
2010-09-27 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: Ensure physical block size is unsigned int Martin K. Petersen
2010-09-27 17:40 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-10-08 5:15 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-10-13 19:12 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-10-13 19:15 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-27 16:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] sd: Fix overflow with big physical blocks Martin K. Petersen
2010-09-27 17:42 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-27 18:13 ` [PATCH] block: eliminate potential for infinite loop in blkdev_issue_discard Mike Snitzer
2010-10-14 21:37 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-10-15 11:05 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-27 16:54 ` I/O topology fixes for big physical block size Jens Axboe
2010-09-27 17:20 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-09-27 22:21 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-27 22:36 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-09-27 23:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-28 4:30 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-28 5:20 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-09-28 14:15 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-28 20:57 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-28 21:24 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-09-28 21:24 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-09-28 21:36 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-09-30 16:30 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-30 17:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-09-30 17:07 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-09-30 17:33 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-10-01 14:24 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-01 22:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-10-01 22:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-10-02 2:31 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-10-02 3:03 ` Daniel Taylor
2010-10-04 19:49 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-10-04 19:49 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-09-27 17:23 ` Mike Snitzer
2010-09-27 21:58 ` James Bottomley
2010-09-27 22:03 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-27 22:14 ` Martin K. Petersen
2010-09-27 22:24 ` Jens Axboe
2010-09-28 18:48 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2010-09-28 18:54 ` Mike Snitzer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1wrq5aels.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.