[PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: use ; instead of , at the of a C statement

[PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: use ; instead of , at the of a C statement

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

This was spotted by Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
while he tried to compile a -RT kernel with this driver enabled.
"make C=2" would also warn about this. This is is based on his patch.

Reported-by: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
index 96c2e420cce6..b0c3e0e56302 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
@@ -368,8 +368,8 @@ static inline void sst_restore_shim64(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx,
 	 * initialize by FW or driver when firmware is loaded
 	 */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
-	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx),
-	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_CSR, shim_regs->csr),
+	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx):
+	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_CSR, shim_regs->csr);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: sst: use ; instead of , at the of a C statement

[Mats Karrman]

On 2015-06-11 14:22, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This was spotted by Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
> while he tried to compile a -RT kernel with this driver enabled.
> "make C=2" would also warn about this. This is is based on his patch.
>
> Reported-by: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
>   sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> index 96c2e420cce6..b0c3e0e56302 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> @@ -368,8 +368,8 @@ static inline void sst_restore_shim64(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx,
>   	 * initialize by FW or driver when firmware is loaded
>   	 */
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
> -	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx),
> -	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_CSR, shim_regs->csr),
> +	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx):
Don't you mean ';' and not ':'?
> +	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_CSR, shim_regs->csr);
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
>   }
>   

[PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: sst: use ; instead of , at the of a C statement

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

This was spotted by Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
while he tried to compile a -RT kernel with this driver enabled.
"make C=2" would also warn about this. This is is based on his patch.

Reported-by: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
* Mats Karrman | 2015-06-11 15:04:25 [+0200]:

>>+	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx):
>Don't you mean ';' and not ':'?
Interresting, yes I do. Thanks.

 sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
index 96c2e420cce6..a4b458e77089 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
@@ -368,8 +368,8 @@ static inline void sst_restore_shim64(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx,
 	 * initialize by FW or driver when firmware is loaded
 	 */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
-	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx),
-	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_CSR, shim_regs->csr),
+	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx);
+	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_CSR, shim_regs->csr);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
 }
 
-- 
2.1.4

Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: sst: use ; instead of , at the of a C statement

[Vinod Koul]

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:14:34PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This was spotted by Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
> while he tried to compile a -RT kernel with this driver enabled.
> "make C=2" would also warn about this. This is is based on his patch.
> 
> Reported-by: Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>

-- 
~Vinod
> ---
> * Mats Karrman | 2015-06-11 15:04:25 [+0200]:
> 
> >>+	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx):
> >Don't you mean ';' and not ':'?
> Interresting, yes I do. Thanks.
> 
>  sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> index 96c2e420cce6..a4b458e77089 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst.c
> @@ -368,8 +368,8 @@ static inline void sst_restore_shim64(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx,
>  	 * initialize by FW or driver when firmware is loaded
>  	 */
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
> -	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx),
> -	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_CSR, shim_regs->csr),
> +	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_IMRX, shim_regs->imrx);
> +	sst_shim_write64(shim, SST_CSR, shim_regs->csr);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.1.4

-- 

Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: Intel: sst: use ; instead of , at the of a C statement

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 304 bytes --]

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 03:14:34PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> This was spotted by Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <nando@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
> while he tried to compile a -RT kernel with this driver enabled.
> "make C=2" would also warn about this. This is is based on his patch.

Applied, thanks.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]