Re: [patch 0/9] S3C24XX/S3C64XX updates

[Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>]

At Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:31:12 +0000,
Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 08:23:25AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> > Me too :)  I wouldn't take this for 2.6.29 as long as it builds now,
> > but this particular change should go through ARM tree, so it's rather
> > Russell's call.  Could you forward this one?
> 
> > The others are applied fine to sound tree as 2.6.30 changes.
> 
> Ordinarily it should go through the ARM tree but due to the addition of
> the S3C64xx support it would create merge issues to separate it out -
> most of the other patches in the series depend on this in one way or
> another.  Ben is the maintainer for the general Samsung processor
> support and this header move is part of a general reorgansation of ARM
> headers from include/asm-arm into arch/arm so it was expected and should
> be entirely uncontrovesial.

Fair enough.

> I could separate it out and push a separate branch via Russell as well
> but that'd make more work for him and he's been having some very bad
> network problems in addition to all the stuff he normally has to do so
> I'm not sure he'd welcome more work right now.

Then it must be OK to keep the changes in our tree.  Though, it'd be
nice to have Russell's ack beforehand.
Maybe we can separate the header-move patch to another branch so that
he can pull it in easily if needed.


thanks,

Takashi