* [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9
@ 2019-06-07 16:38 Zhu, James
[not found] ` <1559925472-20077-1-git-send-email-James.Zhu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Zhu, James @ 2019-06-07 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
Cc: Shamis, Leonid, Gabra, Maroun, Zhu, James, Liu, Shaoyun
Since Hardware bug, GDS exist ECC error after cold boot up,
adding GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9.
Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
index 76722fc..81f6ba8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c
@@ -3634,6 +3634,50 @@ static const struct soc15_reg_entry sec_ded_counter_registers[] = {
{ SOC15_REG_ENTRY(GC, 0, mmSQC_EDC_CNT3), 0, 4, 6},
};
+
+static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
+{
+ struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0];
+ int r;
+
+ r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 17);
+ if (r) {
+ DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: GDS workarounds failed to lock ring %s (%d).\n",
+ ring->name, r);
+ return r;
+ }
+
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3));
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) |
+ WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0));
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE));
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x10000);
+
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_DMA_DATA, 5));
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CP_SYNC |
+ PACKET3_DMA_DATA_DST_SEL(1) |
+ PACKET3_DMA_DATA_SRC_SEL(2) |
+ PACKET3_DMA_DATA_ENGINE(0)));
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CMD_RAW_WAIT | 0x10000);
+
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3));
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) |
+ WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0));
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE));
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0);
+ amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x0);
+
+ amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
{
struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0];
@@ -3810,6 +3854,10 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_ecc_late_init(void *handle)
return 0;
}
+ r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(adev);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
+
/* requires IBs so do in late init after IB pool is initialized */
r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(adev);
if (r)
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread[parent not found: <1559925472-20077-1-git-send-email-James.Zhu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9 [not found] ` <1559925472-20077-1-git-send-email-James.Zhu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> @ 2019-06-07 18:16 ` Alex Deucher [not found] ` <CADnq5_NBWcUtXsBbQP5uBvaOFgWXw3Lhj=ZOisVyTctqZph=xQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Alex Deucher @ 2019-06-07 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhu, James Cc: Shamis, Leonid, Gabra, Maroun, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, Liu, Shaoyun On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:38 PM Zhu, James <James.Zhu@amd.com> wrote: > > Since Hardware bug, GDS exist ECC error after cold boot up, > adding GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9. > > Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > index 76722fc..81f6ba8 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > @@ -3634,6 +3634,50 @@ static const struct soc15_reg_entry sec_ded_counter_registers[] = { > { SOC15_REG_ENTRY(GC, 0, mmSQC_EDC_CNT3), 0, 4, 6}, > }; > > + > +static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > +{ > + struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; > + int r; > + > + r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 17); > + if (r) { > + DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: GDS workarounds failed to lock ring %s (%d).\n", > + ring->name, r); > + return r; > + } > + > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | > + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x10000); hardcoded size, please use the size from the driver. > + > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_DMA_DATA, 5)); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CP_SYNC | > + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_DST_SEL(1) | > + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_SRC_SEL(2) | > + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_ENGINE(0))); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CMD_RAW_WAIT | 0x10000); Instead of hardcoding the size, can you use the gds size from the driver (adev->gds.gds_size). With that fixed: Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > + > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | > + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x0); > + > + amdgpu_ring_commit(ring); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > + > static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > { > struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; > @@ -3810,6 +3854,10 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_ecc_late_init(void *handle) > return 0; > } > > + r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(adev); > + if (r) > + return r; > + > /* requires IBs so do in late init after IB pool is initialized */ > r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(adev); > if (r) > -- > 2.7.4 > > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CADnq5_NBWcUtXsBbQP5uBvaOFgWXw3Lhj=ZOisVyTctqZph=xQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9 [not found] ` <CADnq5_NBWcUtXsBbQP5uBvaOFgWXw3Lhj=ZOisVyTctqZph=xQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> @ 2019-06-07 19:12 ` James Zhu [not found] ` <19203faa-970e-732b-a0e0-d2d1fe69ce30-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: James Zhu @ 2019-06-07 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Deucher, Zhu, James Cc: Shamis, Leonid, Gabra, Maroun, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, Liu, Shaoyun On 2019-06-07 2:16 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote: > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:38 PM Zhu, James <James.Zhu@amd.com> wrote: >> Since Hardware bug, GDS exist ECC error after cold boot up, >> adding GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9. >> >> Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >> index 76722fc..81f6ba8 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >> @@ -3634,6 +3634,50 @@ static const struct soc15_reg_entry sec_ded_counter_registers[] = { >> { SOC15_REG_ENTRY(GC, 0, mmSQC_EDC_CNT3), 0, 4, 6}, >> }; >> >> + >> +static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) >> +{ >> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; >> + int r; >> + >> + r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 17); >> + if (r) { >> + DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: GDS workarounds failed to lock ring %s (%d).\n", >> + ring->name, r); >> + return r; >> + } >> + >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | >> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x10000); > hardcoded size, please use the size from the driver. > >> + >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_DMA_DATA, 5)); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CP_SYNC | >> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_DST_SEL(1) | >> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_SRC_SEL(2) | >> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_ENGINE(0))); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CMD_RAW_WAIT | 0x10000); > Instead of hardcoding the size, can you use the gds size from the > driver (adev->gds.gds_size). Hi Alex, Do you mean adev->gds.mem.total_size? But I see below operation in gfx_v9_0_ngg_init. adev->gds.mem.total_size -= .... Or you want me to add gds_size in struct amdgpu_gds? James > > With that fixed: > Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > >> + >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | >> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x0); >> + >> + amdgpu_ring_commit(ring); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> + >> static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) >> { >> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; >> @@ -3810,6 +3854,10 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_ecc_late_init(void *handle) >> return 0; >> } >> >> + r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(adev); >> + if (r) >> + return r; >> + >> /* requires IBs so do in late init after IB pool is initialized */ >> r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(adev); >> if (r) >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> amd-gfx mailing list >> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <19203faa-970e-732b-a0e0-d2d1fe69ce30-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9 [not found] ` <19203faa-970e-732b-a0e0-d2d1fe69ce30-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> @ 2019-06-07 19:42 ` James Zhu [not found] ` <65266293-ac7a-c3ef-752b-1691299b1f28-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: James Zhu @ 2019-06-07 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhu, James, Alex Deucher Cc: Shamis, Leonid, Gabra, Maroun, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, Liu, Shaoyun On 2019-06-07 3:12 p.m., Zhu, James wrote: > On 2019-06-07 2:16 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:38 PM Zhu, James <James.Zhu@amd.com> wrote: >>> Since Hardware bug, GDS exist ECC error after cold boot up, >>> adding GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >>> index 76722fc..81f6ba8 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >>> @@ -3634,6 +3634,50 @@ static const struct soc15_reg_entry sec_ded_counter_registers[] = { >>> { SOC15_REG_ENTRY(GC, 0, mmSQC_EDC_CNT3), 0, 4, 6}, >>> }; >>> >>> + >>> +static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) >>> +{ >>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; >>> + int r; >>> + >>> + r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 17); >>> + if (r) { >>> + DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: GDS workarounds failed to lock ring %s (%d).\n", >>> + ring->name, r); >>> + return r; >>> + } >>> + >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x10000); >> hardcoded size, please use the size from the driver. >> >>> + >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_DMA_DATA, 5)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CP_SYNC | >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_DST_SEL(1) | >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_SRC_SEL(2) | >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_ENGINE(0))); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CMD_RAW_WAIT | 0x10000); >> Instead of hardcoding the size, can you use the gds size from the >> driver (adev->gds.gds_size). > Hi Alex, > > Do you mean adev->gds.mem.total_size? > > But I see below operation in gfx_v9_0_ngg_init. > > adev->gds.mem.total_size -= .... > > Or you want me to add gds_size in struct amdgpu_gds? > > James Yeah, The amd-staging-drm-next branch has adev->gds.gds_size. James > >> With that fixed: >> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> >> >>> + >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x0); >>> + >>> + amdgpu_ring_commit(ring); >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> + >>> static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) >>> { >>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; >>> @@ -3810,6 +3854,10 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_ecc_late_init(void *handle) >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> + r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(adev); >>> + if (r) >>> + return r; >>> + >>> /* requires IBs so do in late init after IB pool is initialized */ >>> r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(adev); >>> if (r) >>> -- >>> 2.7.4 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> amd-gfx mailing list >>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <65266293-ac7a-c3ef-752b-1691299b1f28-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9 [not found] ` <65266293-ac7a-c3ef-752b-1691299b1f28-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> @ 2019-06-07 20:16 ` Shamis, Leonid [not found] ` <3598A781-7AF5-4DDE-83AE-8835E85573D3-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Shamis, Leonid @ 2019-06-07 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Zhu, James, Alex Deucher Cc: Gabra, Maroun, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, Liu, Shaoyun James, Do you set GDS_VMID0_BASE to 0?.. I don't see it in your patch. Regards, Leonid On 2019-06-07, 15:42, "Zhu, James" <James.Zhu@amd.com> wrote: On 2019-06-07 3:12 p.m., Zhu, James wrote: > On 2019-06-07 2:16 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:38 PM Zhu, James <James.Zhu@amd.com> wrote: >>> Since Hardware bug, GDS exist ECC error after cold boot up, >>> adding GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >>> index 76722fc..81f6ba8 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >>> @@ -3634,6 +3634,50 @@ static const struct soc15_reg_entry sec_ded_counter_registers[] = { >>> { SOC15_REG_ENTRY(GC, 0, mmSQC_EDC_CNT3), 0, 4, 6}, >>> }; >>> >>> + >>> +static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) >>> +{ >>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; >>> + int r; >>> + >>> + r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 17); >>> + if (r) { >>> + DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: GDS workarounds failed to lock ring %s (%d).\n", >>> + ring->name, r); >>> + return r; >>> + } >>> + >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x10000); >> hardcoded size, please use the size from the driver. >> >>> + >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_DMA_DATA, 5)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CP_SYNC | >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_DST_SEL(1) | >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_SRC_SEL(2) | >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_ENGINE(0))); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CMD_RAW_WAIT | 0x10000); >> Instead of hardcoding the size, can you use the gds size from the >> driver (adev->gds.gds_size). > Hi Alex, > > Do you mean adev->gds.mem.total_size? > > But I see below operation in gfx_v9_0_ngg_init. > > adev->gds.mem.total_size -= .... > > Or you want me to add gds_size in struct amdgpu_gds? > > James Yeah, The amd-staging-drm-next branch has adev->gds.gds_size. James > >> With that fixed: >> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> >> >>> + >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x0); >>> + >>> + amdgpu_ring_commit(ring); >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> + >>> static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) >>> { >>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; >>> @@ -3810,6 +3854,10 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_ecc_late_init(void *handle) >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> + r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(adev); >>> + if (r) >>> + return r; >>> + >>> /* requires IBs so do in late init after IB pool is initialized */ >>> r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(adev); >>> if (r) >>> -- >>> 2.7.4 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> amd-gfx mailing list >>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <3598A781-7AF5-4DDE-83AE-8835E85573D3-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9 [not found] ` <3598A781-7AF5-4DDE-83AE-8835E85573D3-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> @ 2019-06-08 12:50 ` Christian König [not found] ` <3ab2a128-3433-0e45-b555-2aff0892f8e6-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2019-06-10 14:16 ` James Zhu 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Christian König @ 2019-06-08 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shamis, Leonid, Zhu, James, Alex Deucher Cc: Gabra, Maroun, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, Liu, Shaoyun Yeah, that would be a good idea as well. Additional to that I suggest to update GDS_VMID0_BASE/_SIZE with direct register writes instead of PM4 packets. Christian. Am 07.06.19 um 22:16 schrieb Shamis, Leonid: > James, > > Do you set GDS_VMID0_BASE to 0?.. I don't see it in your patch. > > Regards, > Leonid > > On 2019-06-07, 15:42, "Zhu, James" <James.Zhu@amd.com> wrote: > > > On 2019-06-07 3:12 p.m., Zhu, James wrote: > > On 2019-06-07 2:16 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:38 PM Zhu, James <James.Zhu@amd.com> wrote: > >>> Since Hardware bug, GDS exist ECC error after cold boot up, > >>> adding GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > >>> index 76722fc..81f6ba8 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > >>> @@ -3634,6 +3634,50 @@ static const struct soc15_reg_entry sec_ded_counter_registers[] = { > >>> { SOC15_REG_ENTRY(GC, 0, mmSQC_EDC_CNT3), 0, 4, 6}, > >>> }; > >>> > >>> + > >>> +static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > >>> +{ > >>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; > >>> + int r; > >>> + > >>> + r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 17); > >>> + if (r) { > >>> + DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: GDS workarounds failed to lock ring %s (%d).\n", > >>> + ring->name, r); > >>> + return r; > >>> + } > >>> + > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | > >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x10000); > >> hardcoded size, please use the size from the driver. > >> > >>> + > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_DMA_DATA, 5)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CP_SYNC | > >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_DST_SEL(1) | > >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_SRC_SEL(2) | > >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_ENGINE(0))); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CMD_RAW_WAIT | 0x10000); > >> Instead of hardcoding the size, can you use the gds size from the > >> driver (adev->gds.gds_size). > > Hi Alex, > > > > Do you mean adev->gds.mem.total_size? > > > > But I see below operation in gfx_v9_0_ngg_init. > > > > adev->gds.mem.total_size -= .... > > > > Or you want me to add gds_size in struct amdgpu_gds? > > > > James > > Yeah, The amd-staging-drm-next branch has adev->gds.gds_size. > > James > > > > >> With that fixed: > >> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > >> > >>> + > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | > >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x0); > >>> + > >>> + amdgpu_ring_commit(ring); > >>> + > >>> + return 0; > >>> +} > >>> + > >>> + > >>> static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > >>> { > >>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; > >>> @@ -3810,6 +3854,10 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_ecc_late_init(void *handle) > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>> > >>> + r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(adev); > >>> + if (r) > >>> + return r; > >>> + > >>> /* requires IBs so do in late init after IB pool is initialized */ > >>> r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(adev); > >>> if (r) > >>> -- > >>> 2.7.4 > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> amd-gfx mailing list > >>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx > > > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <3ab2a128-3433-0e45-b555-2aff0892f8e6-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9 [not found] ` <3ab2a128-3433-0e45-b555-2aff0892f8e6-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> @ 2019-06-10 14:21 ` James Zhu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: James Zhu @ 2019-06-10 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Koenig, Christian, Shamis, Leonid, Zhu, James, Alex Deucher Cc: Gabra, Maroun, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, Liu, Shaoyun On 2019-06-08 8:50 a.m., Christian König wrote: > Yeah, that would be a good idea as well. > > Additional to that I suggest to update GDS_VMID0_BASE/_SIZE with > direct register writes instead of PM4 packets. I can do so. James > > Christian. > > Am 07.06.19 um 22:16 schrieb Shamis, Leonid: >> James, >> >> Do you set GDS_VMID0_BASE to 0?.. I don't see it in your patch. >> >> Regards, >> Leonid >> >> On 2019-06-07, 15:42, "Zhu, James" <James.Zhu@amd.com> wrote: >> >> On 2019-06-07 3:12 p.m., Zhu, James wrote: >> > On 2019-06-07 2:16 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:38 PM Zhu, James >> <James.Zhu@amd.com> wrote: >> >>> Since Hardware bug, GDS exist ECC error after cold boot up, >> >>> adding GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9. >> >>> >> >>> Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> >> >>> --- >> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 48 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >>> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) >> >>> >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >> >>> index 76722fc..81f6ba8 100644 >> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c >> >>> @@ -3634,6 +3634,50 @@ static const struct soc15_reg_entry >> sec_ded_counter_registers[] = { >> >>> { SOC15_REG_ENTRY(GC, 0, mmSQC_EDC_CNT3), 0, 4, 6}, >> >>> }; >> >>> >> >>> + >> >>> +static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(struct >> amdgpu_device *adev) >> >>> +{ >> >>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; >> >>> + int r; >> >>> + >> >>> + r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 17); >> >>> + if (r) { >> >>> + DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: GDS workarounds failed to >> lock ring %s (%d).\n", >> >>> + ring->name, r); >> >>> + return r; >> >>> + } >> >>> + >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, >> 3)); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | >> >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, >> mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x10000); >> >> hardcoded size, please use the size from the driver. >> >> >> >>> + >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_DMA_DATA, 5)); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CP_SYNC | >> >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_DST_SEL(1) | >> >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_SRC_SEL(2) | >> >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_ENGINE(0))); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, >> PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CMD_RAW_WAIT | 0x10000); >> >> Instead of hardcoding the size, can you use the gds size from >> the >> >> driver (adev->gds.gds_size). >> > Hi Alex, >> > >> > Do you mean adev->gds.mem.total_size? >> > >> > But I see below operation in gfx_v9_0_ngg_init. >> > >> > adev->gds.mem.total_size -= .... >> > >> > Or you want me to add gds_size in struct amdgpu_gds? >> > >> > James >> Yeah, The amd-staging-drm-next branch has adev->gds.gds_size. >> James >> > >> >> With that fixed: >> >> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> >> >> >> >>> + >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, >> 3)); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | >> >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, >> mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x0); >> >>> + >> >>> + amdgpu_ring_commit(ring); >> >>> + >> >>> + return 0; >> >>> +} >> >>> + >> >>> + >> >>> static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(struct >> amdgpu_device *adev) >> >>> { >> >>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = >> &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; >> >>> @@ -3810,6 +3854,10 @@ static int >> gfx_v9_0_ecc_late_init(void *handle) >> >>> return 0; >> >>> } >> >>> >> >>> + r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(adev); >> >>> + if (r) >> >>> + return r; >> >>> + >> >>> /* requires IBs so do in late init after IB pool >> is initialized */ >> >>> r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(adev); >> >>> if (r) >> >>> -- >> >>> 2.7.4 >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> amd-gfx mailing list >> >>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >> >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx >> >> _______________________________________________ >> amd-gfx mailing list >> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx > _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9 [not found] ` <3598A781-7AF5-4DDE-83AE-8835E85573D3-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org> 2019-06-08 12:50 ` Christian König @ 2019-06-10 14:16 ` James Zhu 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: James Zhu @ 2019-06-10 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Shamis, Leonid, Zhu, James, Alex Deucher Cc: Gabra, Maroun, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org, Liu, Shaoyun On 2019-06-07 4:16 p.m., Shamis, Leonid wrote: > James, > > Do you set GDS_VMID0_BASE to 0?.. I don't see it in your patch. sure I will add it. JAmes > > Regards, > Leonid > > On 2019-06-07, 15:42, "Zhu, James" <James.Zhu@amd.com> wrote: > > > On 2019-06-07 3:12 p.m., Zhu, James wrote: > > On 2019-06-07 2:16 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 12:38 PM Zhu, James <James.Zhu@amd.com> wrote: > >>> Since Hardware bug, GDS exist ECC error after cold boot up, > >>> adding GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu@amd.com> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > >>> index 76722fc..81f6ba8 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v9_0.c > >>> @@ -3634,6 +3634,50 @@ static const struct soc15_reg_entry sec_ded_counter_registers[] = { > >>> { SOC15_REG_ENTRY(GC, 0, mmSQC_EDC_CNT3), 0, 4, 6}, > >>> }; > >>> > >>> + > >>> +static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > >>> +{ > >>> + struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; > >>> + int r; > >>> + > >>> + r = amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, 17); > >>> + if (r) { > >>> + DRM_ERROR("amdgpu: GDS workarounds failed to lock ring %s (%d).\n", > >>> + ring->name, r); > >>> + return r; > >>> + } > >>> + > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | > >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x10000); > >> hardcoded size, please use the size from the driver. > >> > >>> + > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_DMA_DATA, 5)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, (PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CP_SYNC | > >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_DST_SEL(1) | > >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_SRC_SEL(2) | > >>> + PACKET3_DMA_DATA_ENGINE(0))); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3_DMA_DATA_CMD_RAW_WAIT | 0x10000); > >> Instead of hardcoding the size, can you use the gds size from the > >> driver (adev->gds.gds_size). > > Hi Alex, > > > > Do you mean adev->gds.mem.total_size? > > > > But I see below operation in gfx_v9_0_ngg_init. > > > > adev->gds.mem.total_size -= .... > > > > Or you want me to add gds_size in struct amdgpu_gds? > > > > James > > Yeah, The amd-staging-drm-next branch has adev->gds.gds_size. > > James > > > > >> With that fixed: > >> Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > >> > >>> + > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, PACKET3(PACKET3_WRITE_DATA, 3)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, WRITE_DATA_ENGINE_SEL(0) | > >>> + WRITE_DATA_DST_SEL(0)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, SOC15_REG_OFFSET(GC, 0, mmGDS_VMID0_SIZE)); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0); > >>> + amdgpu_ring_write(ring, 0x0); > >>> + > >>> + amdgpu_ring_commit(ring); > >>> + > >>> + return 0; > >>> +} > >>> + > >>> + > >>> static int gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > >>> { > >>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[0]; > >>> @@ -3810,6 +3854,10 @@ static int gfx_v9_0_ecc_late_init(void *handle) > >>> return 0; > >>> } > >>> > >>> + r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gds_workarounds(adev); > >>> + if (r) > >>> + return r; > >>> + > >>> /* requires IBs so do in late init after IB pool is initialized */ > >>> r = gfx_v9_0_do_edc_gpr_workarounds(adev); > >>> if (r) > >>> -- > >>> 2.7.4 > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> amd-gfx mailing list > >>> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > >>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx > > _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-10 14:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-07 16:38 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Add GDS clearing workaround in later init for gfx9 Zhu, James
[not found] ` <1559925472-20077-1-git-send-email-James.Zhu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-07 18:16 ` Alex Deucher
[not found] ` <CADnq5_NBWcUtXsBbQP5uBvaOFgWXw3Lhj=ZOisVyTctqZph=xQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-07 19:12 ` James Zhu
[not found] ` <19203faa-970e-732b-a0e0-d2d1fe69ce30-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-07 19:42 ` James Zhu
[not found] ` <65266293-ac7a-c3ef-752b-1691299b1f28-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-07 20:16 ` Shamis, Leonid
[not found] ` <3598A781-7AF5-4DDE-83AE-8835E85573D3-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-08 12:50 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <3ab2a128-3433-0e45-b555-2aff0892f8e6-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2019-06-10 14:21 ` James Zhu
2019-06-10 14:16 ` James Zhu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox