AMD-GFX Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kazlauskas, Nicholas" <Nicholas.Kazlauskas-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
To: "Li, Sun peng (Leo)" <Sunpeng.Li-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	"amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org"
	<amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "mario.kleiner.de-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org"
	<mario.kleiner.de-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	"Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/display: Send vblank and user events at vsartup for DCN
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:21:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c6b9af3-65cb-a5a5-4c10-e3d5c4ac754a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed7b7f5e-4a53-f3e1-912f-e0ae5181288c-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>

On 2019-11-05 1:32 p.m., Li, Sun peng (Leo) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2019-11-05 11:15 a.m., Kazlauskas, Nicholas wrote:
>> On 2019-11-05 10:34 a.m., sunpeng.li@amd.com wrote:
>>> From: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
>>>
>>> [Why]
>>>
>>> For DCN hardware, the crtc_high_irq handler is assigned to the vstartup
>>> interrupt. This is different from DCE, which has it assigned to vblank
>>> start.
>>>
>>> We'd like to send vblank and user events at vstartup because:
>>>
>>> * It happens close enough to vupdate - the point of no return for HW.
>>>
>>> * It is programmed as lines relative to vblank end - i.e. it is not in
>>>     the variable portion when VRR is enabled. We should signal user
>>>     events here.
>>>
>>> * The pflip interrupt responsible for sending user events today only
>>>     fires if the DCH HUBP component is not clock gated. In situations
>>>     where planes are disabled - but the CRTC is enabled - user events won't
>>>     be sent out, leading to flip done timeouts.
>>>
>>> Consequently, this makes vupdate on DCN hardware redundant. It will be
>>> removed in the next change.
>>>
>>> [How]
>>>
>>> Add a DCN-specific crtc_high_irq handler, and hook it to the VStartup
>>> signal. Inside the DCN handler, we send off user events if the pflip
>>> handler hasn't already done so.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>    .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>    1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>>> index 00017b91c91a..256a23a0ec28 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>>> @@ -485,6 +485,69 @@ static void dm_crtc_high_irq(void *interrupt_params)
>>>    	}
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * dm_dcn_crtc_high_irq() - Handles VStartup interrupt for DCN generation ASICs
>>> + * @interrupt params - interrupt parameters
>>> + *
>>> + * Notify DRM's vblank event handler at VSTARTUP
>>> + *
>>> + * Unlike DCE hardware, we trigger the handler at VSTARTUP. at which:
>>> + * * We are close enough to VUPDATE - the point of no return for hw
>>> + * * We are in the fixed portion of variable front porch when vrr is enabled
>>> + * * We are before VUPDATE, where double-buffered vrr registers are swapped
>>> + *
>>> + * It is therefore the correct place to signal vblank, send user flip events,
>>> + * and update VRR.
>>> + */
>>> +static void dm_dcn_crtc_high_irq(void *interrupt_params)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct common_irq_params *irq_params = interrupt_params;
>>> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = irq_params->adev;
>>> +	struct amdgpu_crtc *acrtc;
>>> +	struct dm_crtc_state *acrtc_state;
>>> +	unsigned long flags;
>>> +
>>> +	acrtc = get_crtc_by_otg_inst(adev, irq_params->irq_src - IRQ_TYPE_VBLANK);
>>> +
>>> +	if (!acrtc)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	acrtc_state = to_dm_crtc_state(acrtc->base.state);
>>> +
>>> +	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("crtc:%d, vupdate-vrr:%d\n", acrtc->crtc_id,
>>> +				amdgpu_dm_vrr_active(acrtc_state));
>>> +
>>> +	amdgpu_dm_crtc_handle_crc_irq(&acrtc->base);
>>> +	drm_crtc_handle_vblank(&acrtc->base);
>>
>> Shouldn't this be the other way around? Don't we want the CRC sent back
>> to userspace to have the updated vblank counter?
>>
>> This is how it worked before at least.
>>
>> Other than that, this patch looks fine to me.
>>
>> Nicholas Kazlauskas
> 
> 
> Looks like we're doing a crtc_accurate_vblank_count() inside the crc handler,
> so I don't think order matters here.
> 
> Leo

Sounds fine to me then.

Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>

Nicholas Kazlauskas

> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&adev->ddev->event_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> +	if (acrtc_state->vrr_params.supported &&
>>> +	    acrtc_state->freesync_config.state == VRR_STATE_ACTIVE_VARIABLE) {
>>> +		mod_freesync_handle_v_update(
>>> +		adev->dm.freesync_module,
>>> +		acrtc_state->stream,
>>> +		&acrtc_state->vrr_params);
>>> +
>>> +		dc_stream_adjust_vmin_vmax(
>>> +			adev->dm.dc,
>>> +			acrtc_state->stream,
>>> +			&acrtc_state->vrr_params.adjust);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (acrtc->pflip_status == AMDGPU_FLIP_SUBMITTED) {
>>> +		if (acrtc->event) {
>>> +			drm_crtc_send_vblank_event(&acrtc->base, acrtc->event);
>>> +			acrtc->event = NULL;
>>> +			drm_crtc_vblank_put(&acrtc->base);
>>> +		}
>>> +		acrtc->pflip_status = AMDGPU_FLIP_NONE;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adev->ddev->event_lock, flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static int dm_set_clockgating_state(void *handle,
>>>    		  enum amd_clockgating_state state)
>>>    {
>>> @@ -2175,7 +2238,7 @@ static int dcn10_register_irq_handlers(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>    		c_irq_params->irq_src = int_params.irq_source;
>>>
>>>    		amdgpu_dm_irq_register_interrupt(adev, &int_params,
>>> -				dm_crtc_high_irq, c_irq_params);
>>> +				dm_dcn_crtc_high_irq, c_irq_params);
>>>    	}
>>>
>>>    	/* Use VUPDATE_NO_LOCK interrupt on DCN, which seems to correspond to
>>> --
>>> 2.23.0
>>>
>>

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Kazlauskas, Nicholas" <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@amd.com>
To: "Li, Sun peng (Leo)" <Sunpeng.Li@amd.com>,
	"amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com" <mario.kleiner.de@gmail.com>,
	"Wentland, Harry" <Harry.Wentland@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/display: Send vblank and user events at vsartup for DCN
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 20:21:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c6b9af3-65cb-a5a5-4c10-e3d5c4ac754a@amd.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191105202140.TldAm4EbUH9qa9pQKc_ET-WbnvTod0VBQGTH93SudIY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed7b7f5e-4a53-f3e1-912f-e0ae5181288c@amd.com>

On 2019-11-05 1:32 p.m., Li, Sun peng (Leo) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2019-11-05 11:15 a.m., Kazlauskas, Nicholas wrote:
>> On 2019-11-05 10:34 a.m., sunpeng.li@amd.com wrote:
>>> From: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
>>>
>>> [Why]
>>>
>>> For DCN hardware, the crtc_high_irq handler is assigned to the vstartup
>>> interrupt. This is different from DCE, which has it assigned to vblank
>>> start.
>>>
>>> We'd like to send vblank and user events at vstartup because:
>>>
>>> * It happens close enough to vupdate - the point of no return for HW.
>>>
>>> * It is programmed as lines relative to vblank end - i.e. it is not in
>>>     the variable portion when VRR is enabled. We should signal user
>>>     events here.
>>>
>>> * The pflip interrupt responsible for sending user events today only
>>>     fires if the DCH HUBP component is not clock gated. In situations
>>>     where planes are disabled - but the CRTC is enabled - user events won't
>>>     be sent out, leading to flip done timeouts.
>>>
>>> Consequently, this makes vupdate on DCN hardware redundant. It will be
>>> removed in the next change.
>>>
>>> [How]
>>>
>>> Add a DCN-specific crtc_high_irq handler, and hook it to the VStartup
>>> signal. Inside the DCN handler, we send off user events if the pflip
>>> handler hasn't already done so.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
>>> ---
>>>    .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>    1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>>> index 00017b91c91a..256a23a0ec28 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
>>> @@ -485,6 +485,69 @@ static void dm_crtc_high_irq(void *interrupt_params)
>>>    	}
>>>    }
>>>
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * dm_dcn_crtc_high_irq() - Handles VStartup interrupt for DCN generation ASICs
>>> + * @interrupt params - interrupt parameters
>>> + *
>>> + * Notify DRM's vblank event handler at VSTARTUP
>>> + *
>>> + * Unlike DCE hardware, we trigger the handler at VSTARTUP. at which:
>>> + * * We are close enough to VUPDATE - the point of no return for hw
>>> + * * We are in the fixed portion of variable front porch when vrr is enabled
>>> + * * We are before VUPDATE, where double-buffered vrr registers are swapped
>>> + *
>>> + * It is therefore the correct place to signal vblank, send user flip events,
>>> + * and update VRR.
>>> + */
>>> +static void dm_dcn_crtc_high_irq(void *interrupt_params)
>>> +{
>>> +	struct common_irq_params *irq_params = interrupt_params;
>>> +	struct amdgpu_device *adev = irq_params->adev;
>>> +	struct amdgpu_crtc *acrtc;
>>> +	struct dm_crtc_state *acrtc_state;
>>> +	unsigned long flags;
>>> +
>>> +	acrtc = get_crtc_by_otg_inst(adev, irq_params->irq_src - IRQ_TYPE_VBLANK);
>>> +
>>> +	if (!acrtc)
>>> +		return;
>>> +
>>> +	acrtc_state = to_dm_crtc_state(acrtc->base.state);
>>> +
>>> +	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("crtc:%d, vupdate-vrr:%d\n", acrtc->crtc_id,
>>> +				amdgpu_dm_vrr_active(acrtc_state));
>>> +
>>> +	amdgpu_dm_crtc_handle_crc_irq(&acrtc->base);
>>> +	drm_crtc_handle_vblank(&acrtc->base);
>>
>> Shouldn't this be the other way around? Don't we want the CRC sent back
>> to userspace to have the updated vblank counter?
>>
>> This is how it worked before at least.
>>
>> Other than that, this patch looks fine to me.
>>
>> Nicholas Kazlauskas
> 
> 
> Looks like we're doing a crtc_accurate_vblank_count() inside the crc handler,
> so I don't think order matters here.
> 
> Leo

Sounds fine to me then.

Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>

Nicholas Kazlauskas

> 
>>
>>> +
>>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&adev->ddev->event_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> +	if (acrtc_state->vrr_params.supported &&
>>> +	    acrtc_state->freesync_config.state == VRR_STATE_ACTIVE_VARIABLE) {
>>> +		mod_freesync_handle_v_update(
>>> +		adev->dm.freesync_module,
>>> +		acrtc_state->stream,
>>> +		&acrtc_state->vrr_params);
>>> +
>>> +		dc_stream_adjust_vmin_vmax(
>>> +			adev->dm.dc,
>>> +			acrtc_state->stream,
>>> +			&acrtc_state->vrr_params.adjust);
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	if (acrtc->pflip_status == AMDGPU_FLIP_SUBMITTED) {
>>> +		if (acrtc->event) {
>>> +			drm_crtc_send_vblank_event(&acrtc->base, acrtc->event);
>>> +			acrtc->event = NULL;
>>> +			drm_crtc_vblank_put(&acrtc->base);
>>> +		}
>>> +		acrtc->pflip_status = AMDGPU_FLIP_NONE;
>>> +	}
>>> +
>>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adev->ddev->event_lock, flags);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static int dm_set_clockgating_state(void *handle,
>>>    		  enum amd_clockgating_state state)
>>>    {
>>> @@ -2175,7 +2238,7 @@ static int dcn10_register_irq_handlers(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
>>>    		c_irq_params->irq_src = int_params.irq_source;
>>>
>>>    		amdgpu_dm_irq_register_interrupt(adev, &int_params,
>>> -				dm_crtc_high_irq, c_irq_params);
>>> +				dm_dcn_crtc_high_irq, c_irq_params);
>>>    	}
>>>
>>>    	/* Use VUPDATE_NO_LOCK interrupt on DCN, which seems to correspond to
>>> --
>>> 2.23.0
>>>
>>

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-05 20:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-05 15:34 [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/display: Send vblank and user events at vsartup for DCN sunpeng.li-5C7GfCeVMHo
2019-11-05 15:34 ` sunpeng.li
     [not found] ` <20191105153416.32049-1-sunpeng.li-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-11-05 15:34   ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/amd/display: Disable VUpdate interrupt for DCN hardware sunpeng.li-5C7GfCeVMHo
2019-11-05 15:34     ` sunpeng.li
     [not found]     ` <20191105153416.32049-2-sunpeng.li-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-11-05 15:58       ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] " sunpeng.li-5C7GfCeVMHo
2019-11-05 15:58         ` sunpeng.li
     [not found]         ` <20191105155802.1302-1-sunpeng.li-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-11-05 16:16           ` Kazlauskas, Nicholas
2019-11-05 16:16             ` Kazlauskas, Nicholas
     [not found]             ` <47f9dd1b-66c1-a521-d6c8-b9422616cf2e-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-11-05 18:54               ` Li, Sun peng (Leo)
2019-11-05 18:54                 ` Li, Sun peng (Leo)
2019-11-05 19:01           ` [PATCH v3] " sunpeng.li-5C7GfCeVMHo
2019-11-05 19:01             ` sunpeng.li
     [not found]             ` <20191105190147.7283-1-sunpeng.li-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-11-05 19:04               ` Li, Sun peng (Leo)
2019-11-05 19:04                 ` Li, Sun peng (Leo)
2019-11-05 19:07           ` [PATCH v4] " sunpeng.li-5C7GfCeVMHo
2019-11-05 19:07             ` sunpeng.li
     [not found]             ` <20191105190709.7816-1-sunpeng.li-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-11-05 20:21               ` Kazlauskas, Nicholas
2019-11-05 20:21                 ` Kazlauskas, Nicholas
2019-11-05 16:15   ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/amd/display: Send vblank and user events at vsartup for DCN Kazlauskas, Nicholas
2019-11-05 16:15     ` Kazlauskas, Nicholas
     [not found]     ` <c93c503d-48dc-1ea5-19f7-42ff9392e162-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-11-05 18:32       ` Li, Sun peng (Leo)
2019-11-05 18:32         ` Li, Sun peng (Leo)
     [not found]         ` <ed7b7f5e-4a53-f3e1-912f-e0ae5181288c-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-11-05 20:21           ` Kazlauskas, Nicholas [this message]
2019-11-05 20:21             ` Kazlauskas, Nicholas
2019-11-29 19:20         ` Mario Kleiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5c6b9af3-65cb-a5a5-4c10-e3d5c4ac754a@amd.com \
    --to=nicholas.kazlauskas-5c7gfcevmho@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Harry.Wentland-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Sunpeng.Li-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mario.kleiner.de-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox