ATH10K Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ath10k tx99-like test mode?
@ 2015-03-16 12:21 Simon Wunderlich
  2015-03-16 15:04 ` Ben Greear
  2015-03-16 21:01 ` Pushpal Sidhu
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Simon Wunderlich @ 2015-03-16 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath10k


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 230 bytes --]

Hi,

is there a test mode for ath10k where one can set different legacy/MCS rates to 
test output power levels in a lab? We used tx99 on ath9k for that purpose, is 
there an equivalent feature in ath10k as well?

Thanks!
    Simon

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 146 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: ath10k tx99-like test mode?
@ 2015-03-16 20:51 mrex
  2015-03-16 21:21 ` Ben Greear
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: mrex @ 2015-03-16 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ath10k

Ben,

The tx99 feature has the benefit of not needing any client or traffic to be
passed for a power meter to measure.  So it’s incredibly fast to test
different rates and output power than having to wait for client to
re-associate, pass traffic and adjust power meter to duty cycle (depending
on how fancy the meter is).  This is more applicable for calibration and
evaluation than for adaption or protocol testing.

Tx99 is better suited for calibration and FCC certification testing and not
for testing things like adaptive modulation or what happens when mixed
modulations are enabled.  It cuts down on lab certification test time and
complexity (lab engineers test a different wireless widget every day and not
familiar with webGUI’s and config settings, etc).  Tx99 often was more ‘raw’
and didn’t behave the same as adaptive modulation algorithm, probably more
so with more streams than 1 and 11b/g/n.

So having a feature that can just output raw frames at full duty cycle at a
specific rate and output power without client would be highly beneficial for
lab testing and reduce test time and complexity for radio validation.

Best regards,
Mike


_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-16 21:21 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-16 12:21 ath10k tx99-like test mode? Simon Wunderlich
2015-03-16 15:04 ` Ben Greear
2015-03-16 21:01 ` Pushpal Sidhu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-16 20:51 mrex
2015-03-16 21:21 ` Ben Greear

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox